Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Creationism/new
Add topicLatest comment: 15 years ago by Arlen22 in topic Why?
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Why?
[edit]Exactly why is this restructure necessary? And why haven't you sought a WP:CONSENSUS for it from project participants first? HrafnTalkStalk(P) 13:18, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
- And why haven't you said anything before. When I restructure, I make it look good and then bring it up to date and online. It makes it look better. Any supporting pages are not in operation until this goes to the front. Arlen22 (talk) 13:29, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
- Why? Because back in January I had my hands really full implementing the real change -- from WikiProject ID to WikiProject Creationism (with heaps and heaps of categories, templates, settings, etc needing changing). So I simply watchlisted your page with a mental note to myself to do something about it if you took it any further. You just did, so I just have. With the notable exceptions of the 'Further reading' and 'External links' sections at the bottom, the existing page is already fairly up up to date -- and (at least in my opinion) looks better than your alternative. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 13:38, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
- Of course it is. :) I meant that this page is the one that I bring up to date once I have the design worked out. Arlen22 (talk) 20:24, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Why? Because back in January I had my hands really full implementing the real change -- from WikiProject ID to WikiProject Creationism (with heaps and heaps of categories, templates, settings, etc needing changing). So I simply watchlisted your page with a mental note to myself to do something about it if you took it any further. You just did, so I just have. With the notable exceptions of the 'Further reading' and 'External links' sections at the bottom, the existing page is already fairly up up to date -- and (at least in my opinion) looks better than your alternative. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 13:38, 11 June 2011 (UTC)