User talk:Wikieditor20101

October 2026

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Republic of Upper Volta have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Self governing colony was the Brtish empire not french Empire Wikieditor20101 (talk) 17:14, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Hi Wikieditor20101! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Pitcairn Islands and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Day Creature (talk) 16:10, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, Pitacrin Island is not self-governing, the governor still has significant authority. Wikieditor20101 (talk) 17:57, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dominion. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. It is disruptive to continue to mark major edits as minor after being asked not to do so. DrKay (talk) 20:20, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Hi Wikieditor20101! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Charles III and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Repeated use of the “minor edit” tag can be a form of disrupting editing. Please follow the established guidelines for editing on Wikipedia. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 00:58, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Charles III, you may be blocked from editing. Please note that you have been warned before about inappropriate use of the minor edit tag. It is disruptive to continue to mark major edits as minor after being asked to stop. DrKay (talk) 05:29, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Bo French. radioactOlive_(she/it)(talk) 02:03, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

are you blind? Wikieditor20101 (talk) 02:03, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

I saw your reason as "NPOV," however deleting something - even a possibly contentious political label - supported by 5 references requires more than just saying that its non-neutral. Establish a consensus on the talk page before removing it. radioactOlive_(she/it)(talk) 02:36, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Okay fair enough. Wikieditor20101 (talk) 02:47, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. You're still tagging edits as minor when they are not minor, despite being asked multiple times not to do so. DrKay (talk) 06:15, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Typos

Please double check your edits before publishing them, as nearly all of your edits have typos (grammatical errors and spelling mistakes) in them. If English is not your first language, consider also contributing to the Wikipedia in your native language. Finally, be mindful of Wikipedia's civility policies as some of your comments, such as the one above, have been quite aggressive. Cheers. Yue🌙 (talk) 05:26, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

October 2026

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours because your recent edits appear to be disruptive. Please note that this is not necessarily an assessment of faith or character, and we welcome good faith edits that are also constructive and in line with our policies. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  CoconutOctopus talk 19:04, 8 October 2026 (UTC)