User talk:WikiSal
Add topicWelcome!
[edit]Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, — AP 499D25 (talk) 04:24, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
1896 Sherman Tornado
[edit]Hello, Quincy Gordon, I'm Halls4521. Like you, I was putting together a draft version for a article for the 1896 Sherman Tornado as well. Since it looks like your further along than I am, here's my draft here, just in case you want to use some additional sentences and references for yours. Thanks. Halls4521 (talk) 05:48, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- I am absolutely impressed with the work you have, I will surely use what you have and when I can I will credit you for your contributions, thank you! Quincy Gordon (talk) 16:14, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Self-made tornado track maps
[edit]If possible, can you add sources in the descriptions to show what resource these maps are made from? I'm mostly afraid that these maps would constitute WP:OR if they are made from satellite/videos of the funnel or WP:SYNTH if they're just mashed together from newspaper reports, which aren't always reliable. Thanks! EF5 17:35, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah I can try to for future ones Quincy Gordon (talk) 03:13, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]| The Tornado Barnstar | ||
| Thank you for your work on finding public domain tornado images. Your work is greatly appreciated! EF5 14:38, 5 May 2026 (UTC) |
2011 Hackleburg tornado images
[edit]Any chance you could find more public domain image of the 2011 Hackleburg tornado? I know we have one (Dustin Morgan) but it would not hurt to have some more IMO. I searched around and haven’t had any luck so far. MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 21:15, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
- I can potentially see what I can do
- Though I am just happy I was able to get in contact with Dustin Morgan in the first place to get his sequence of 5 images. Quincy Gordon (talk) 21:21, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
Tornado images
[edit]Hey, I just wanted to show some appreciation for your efforts in finding free-to-use tornado images, pictures that are very high-quality no less. The pictures are the first impression anyone gets of an article, so you have pretty much single–handedly improved a ton of tornado articles. You do this for so many articles and I don't see you getting a ton of appreciation for that, so thank you. Tetradisulfate (talk) 03:02, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
- Your kind words mean so much to me, thank you so much! Quincy Gordon (talk) 03:41, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
- As a resident of New Richmond, WI, the new image surprised me. Pretty cool, man. Where is that newspaper based from? I’d love to have a look if there’s an archive of it somewhere. ILoveTheRepublic (talk) 14:16, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- The Newspaper it was published in should be in the source of it Quincy Gordon (talk) 00:00, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- As a resident of New Richmond, WI, the new image surprised me. Pretty cool, man. Where is that newspaper based from? I’d love to have a look if there’s an archive of it somewhere. ILoveTheRepublic (talk) 14:16, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
A duck for you!
[edit]
Ducks promote Wikilove and hopefully this one has made your day much better.
Spread WikiLove by placing a duck on other user's talk pages by adding {{subst:Duck love}} to their talk page.
Happy editing!
-Ari 1600! 🇺🇲🇭🇳 15:16, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
File:2021 Centerville tornado.jpg
[edit]I just wanted to let you know that the town name in this file should be Centreville not Centerville. ChessEric 16:29, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- yeah it was a misspell that I just never felt like fixing lol Quincy Gordon (talk) 16:45, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
The Monthly Wiki-Weather Review - Issue 1 (September 1, 2026)
[edit]|
Volume I, Issue 1, September 1, 2026 The Monthly Wiki-Weather Review
This is the first edition for what will hopefully be a monthly newsletter involving Wikipedia's weather articles, including the severe weather and tropical cyclones projects. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject. If you wish to receive or discontinue your subscription to this newsletter, please visit the mailing list. Past editions can be viewed here. |
|
Development, Reminders, and Updates
Series of weather topics that need expansion The following articles are the earliest in a series of lists/articles, and including the gap going back to the previous entry in the series. These are articles that need to be written.
Of note, the yearly "Weather of YYYY" could be a useful parent article for every weather article. For a well-written (and well-sourced) example, see this timeline in the Weather of 2023 article. Image of the month Devastating floods, possibly caused by a glacial collapse, hit the China–Nepal border on August 26. These floods destroyed numerous settlements and killed over 1,000 people (with thousands still missing). The above image is a Landsat 9 view of debris flow from the floods.
The following articles were written/published this year. It excludes any of sub-articles within Weather of 2026.
Longtime editors and lurkers might have noticed an uptick in the number of article mergers this year. A discussion in December 2025 talked about articles for fish storms or were otherwise had minor impacts. As Hurricane Noah summarized, "if a storm isn't being discussed after the fact for meteorological notability and impacts were minor or nil, there shouldn't be an article. Since then, 8 featured articles and 76 good articles have been merged. In a recent AFD, Quxyz mentioned their own minimum threshold for a tropical cyclone article (1,000 words and 20,000 bytes).
There are a few ongoing projects that are needed in Wiki-Project weather, separate from any requested articles.
Comments or suggestions? This is the first of what will hopefully be a long-running newsletter. If you have any suggestions or complaints (such as them being in a different order in the section header), click on the previous links or try the newsletter talk page.
|
1947 Leedey tornado
[edit]Thanks for flagging the significant issues with this article. If I were you, in the future I would fully support if you decide to WP:BEBOLD and draftify similar articles without the full discussion. Vegantics (talk) 18:13, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- As much as I would like to, unfortunately it seems that the two who worked on the article would just, revert my move, so I felt like avoiding that and requesting a draftification instead
- I have had to get several articles of theirs drafted or deleted already because they all seem either AI generated, or rushed, as if they were being mass produced, and all have sourcing issues. Quincy Gordon (talk) 18:41, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- I didn't realize that there were multiple editors, what an absolute headache. Thanks again for your work. Vegantics (talk) 19:22, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- I would not be surprised if it is one editor and the other account is an alt Quincy Gordon (talk) 19:24, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- Welp, it was in fact the same person! AND HE HAS BEEN BANNED FOR AI MISUSE! Quincy Gordon (talk) 20:37, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- You'll forgive my punning, but what a whirlwind. Vegantics (talk) 15:30, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- Absolute Cinema Quincy Gordon (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- You'll forgive my punning, but what a whirlwind. Vegantics (talk) 15:30, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- I didn't realize that there were multiple editors, what an absolute headache. Thanks again for your work. Vegantics (talk) 19:22, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
The Monthly Wiki-Weather Review - Issue 2 (October 1, 2026)
[edit]|
Volume I, Issue 2, October 1, 2026 The Monthly Wiki-Weather Review Issue 2: Electric Boogaloo Edition
This is the second edition the monthly newsletter involving Wikipedia's weather articles, including the severe weather and tropical cyclones projects. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject. If you wish to receive or discontinue your subscription to this newsletter, please visit the mailing list. Past editions can be viewed here. Editors: Hurricanehink (HH), Eoline (E) | |
Since the last issue, the following became good articles
The following articles were written/published in the last month (or were missed). It excludes any of sub-articles within Weather of 2026.
Development, Reminders, and Updates
Image of the month - Hurricane Polo offshore Mexico Hurricane Polo became the second-strongest recorded Pacific hurricane on September 22, when Hurricane Hunters recorded a minimum central pressure of 892 mbar (26.3 inHg). Polo attained Category 5 status three times before weakening and striking northwestern Mexico twice. Tasks/projects from previous newsletter - Issue 1 had a section for the series of weather articles. This included seasons or weather events by year, such as from Weather of 1946 to 1985 and from 1985 to 2000. Other ongoing tasks include updating tropical cyclone track maps, button bar templates, and changing the coding for the season infobox template to allow for violent typhoons.
The 2026 edition of WikiConference North America was held in Edmonton, Canada, throughout the week of September 21, with at least one project member in attendance. Main topics included discussion of Wikimedia administration, WikiPortraits, and Wikimedia Commons. Interested editors are invited to read through this presentation, which was presented by User:Z1720 during the conference; it discusses how to write featured articles.
Although Wikipedia isn't specifically a weather encyclopedia, it fulfills that role to an extent. The "List of [weather events] by area" series is getting finished one by one, even if there are still a lot to go. The following areas are among the most complete:
Many areas could have a variety of lists. There's a draft for Tornadoes in Florida, which, if published, would join the above list. There is also a draft for Snow in Texas, which would also add Texas to the above list, assuming you counted the dab and quasi-article that is the List of Texas hurricanes (which you could help by adding climatology, the deadliest Texas tornadoes, and a list of (E)F5 tornadoes in the state). If you're interested in working on one of the potential location-based lists of weather impacts in an area, be bold and try it (maybe starting with a draft), or ask HH for help.
The previous newsletter mentioned the tropical cyclone merge-a-thon in which around 100 storm articles have been merged. There has also been an increase in proposed mergers of tornado-related articles to their parent tornado outbreak. Some of the main arguments have been about sustained lasting coverage (six months after the event), and whether the individual articles are a content fork from the outbreak article. There remains a need to codify tornado notability standards, with regards to outbreak and single tornado articles.
It's important to assume good faith and be open-minded/welcoming as we build a more perfect encyclopedia. HH admits he has pushed his own preferences a bit too much at times. Discussions need to remain civil. But the Paradox of Tolerance can lead to bad outcomes. For instance, there has been a rise in articles written by AI, which is not allowed. Now that Wikipedia is over 25 years old, it has its fair share of people who were blocked, including sockpuppets trying to disrupt the positive legacy we've all built. That does not mean to assume that all new users are either using AI or are sockpuppets! Most editors started just like you. Still, if it seems like users are baiting you to engage in discussion, that might be in bad faith. At those times, be sure to take a deep breath, and remember that there's no deadline. Sometimes, a troublesome user will out themselves and get blocked, whether due to AI-writing or other bad habits. "If it looks/swims/quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck. If you have evidence someone is abusing more than one Wikipedia account, see Sockpuppet investigations. Random fun thing found during Wikipedia research While working on Hurricane Agnes, 12george1* found this legendary document from the NHC archives:
Don't be like this guy and make sure you're all careful editing! Comments or suggestions? This is the second edition of what will hopefully be a long-running newsletter. If you have any suggestions or complaints (such as them being in a different order in the section header), click on the previous links or try the newsletter talk page.
|
A duck for you! :D
[edit]
Ducks promote Wikilove and hopefully this one has made your day much better.
Spread WikiLove by placing a duck on other user's talk pages by adding {{subst:Duck love}} to their talk page.
Happy editing!
-Ari 1600! 🇺🇲🇭🇳 03:26, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:2023 Wellman tornado.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:2023 Wellman tornado.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 24 October 2026 (UTC)


