User talk:UmbraSolis

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi UmbraSolis. Thank you for your work on History of Garbagna Novarese. Another editor, Uncle Bash007, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Congratulations and thank you for creating this page. Can't imagine the effort you put in creating this page. Your work is really appreciated!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 11:40, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

@Uncle Bash007: Hi! You're welcome. I hope nobody's getting too bored reading such a long page for such a small place :-D UmbraSolis (talk) 11:43, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Not at all! It is detailed. I'm sure readers and students will find it very proficient. Keep it up! Uncle Bash007 (talk) 12:46, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

@Uncle Bash007: Hi, man! A question about class rating of a page (I could not find the answer in the related guide, sorry): recently I've expanded the Italian municipality Garbagna Novarese page a lot, but it's still rated as Stub: is there a way to request for a re-assessment? I'm quite sure it is now a little more than a stub, but I don't know whether the change shall be notified to somebody or I simply need to wait. Thanks in advance! UmbraSolis (talk) 05:41, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

@UmbraSolis, wow, thank you for your work. It’s indeed much more than a stub. I will review and update the article’s status.

Best Uncle Bash007 (talk) 06:25, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much, but... is this the standard way to request for re-assessments? In this case I've shamelessly taken advantage that you had already contacted me, but I'm not sure it's fair enough :-D UmbraSolis (talk) 07:29, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Non-attributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from it:Chiesa di San Michele Arcangelo (Garbagna Novarese) to Chiesa di San Michele Arcangelo (Garbagna Novarese). While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:27, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll add all attributions. UmbraSolis (talk) 19:46, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

Just added, both attributions and translation tags. UmbraSolis (talk) 20:34, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi UmbraSolis. Thank you for your work on Garbagna Novarese railway station. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for this clear and appropriately referenced article, with considerable detail spanning its whole history (not just its creation and current status). Some of the referencing is quite specific, to primary sources, but this is reasonable to verify facts.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 09:56, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi UmbraSolis. Thank you for your work on Ernesto Colli (priest). Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for this biography of a 20th-century historian. It seems to be mostly based on the Italian article; remember to acknowledge this in the first edit summary. See HELP:TRANSLATION. There are also some phrases with particular meaning that won't be conveyed clearly to readers in English. For example, what is the importance of the phrase 'i ragazzi del '99', beyond its literal meaning. Notability for Colli is primarily WP:NAUTHOR.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 10:08, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Franca Franzosi

I'm curious. Why did you use mdy dates in the article that you recently created? Regards Denisarona (talk) 08:16, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi, @Denisarona:. As far as I remember, it was the format most often used within the pages I looked at. Indeed, it's not the Italian way :-) UmbraSolis (talk) 10:00, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi, maybe you can check: Date and time notation in Italy. The use of dmy dates is standard in Italy. Regards Denisarona (talk) 10:04, 25 March 2026 (UTC)