User talk:Srbtiger

January 2014

Hello, I'm Bobrayner. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Vladimir Djordjevic (martial artist) because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. bobrayner (talk) 01:31, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:19, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Denniss/Sandbox3. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Denniss (talk) 09:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Denniss/Sandbox, you may be blocked from editing. Denniss (talk) 18:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Denniss. Jim1138 (talk) 18:22, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing and vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Acather96 (click here to contact me) 20:20, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Siptarski editori wikipedije

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Siptarski editori wikipedije, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 20:39, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Odbrana (tactical defense system)

Hi,

The article in which you are interested was deleted according to Wikipedia's proposed deletion process. This means that the request of anyone, including yourself, is sufficient to have the article restored, which I will do shortly. Basically, proposed deletion is shortened process, where articles are deleted without a full debate. This restoration does not ensure that the article will remain permanently, though. All Wikipedia articles must demonstrate notability according to reliable sources, and all articles must be written in neutral tone. The person who asked for the deletion of Odbrana (tactical defense system) expressed concerns about whether the topic was notable according to reliable sources, and whether the article was sufficiently neutral in tone. After I restore the article, any editor may call for a full debate on whether the article meets Wikipedia's guidelines. If you have any other questions, I'll be happy to assist you. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 03:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Vladimir Djordjevic (martial artist)

Hi,

As before, I have restored the article on Mr. Djordevic after your request. The same concerns about reliable sources are likely to be raised against his article as against Odbrana (which is currently undergoing an articles for deletion debate.) These article simply need more reliable sources in order to remain in the encyclopedia. Webpages which appear to be affiliated commercially with Odbrana or Mr. Djordjevic are simply not considered reliable, according to the Wikipedia's definition of the term. If reliable sources cannot be found, it may be that Odbrana and Mr. Djordjevic simply do not meet the requirements of Wikipedia's notability guidelines. There is no shame in this. As time passes, if the martial art and the instructor continue to grow in renown, reliable sources will eventually appear. If you know of other books, journals, or websites which meet the requirements of a reliable source, add them to article. That is the best advice I can give. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 20:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

ODBRANA - Tactical Defense System / Hand To Hand Combat

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of ODBRANA - Tactical Defense System / Hand To Hand Combat, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.potiori.com/Odbrana_(tactical_defense_system).html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:16, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Владимир Ђорђевић

The page Владимир Ђорђевић has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:30, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vladimir Djordjevic (producer) (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HwyNerd Mike were:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vladimir Djordjevic (producer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HwyNerd Mike (t | c) 04:57, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Srbtiger! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HwyNerd Mike (t | c) 04:57, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vladimir Djordjevic (producer) (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vladimir Djordjevic (producer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:11, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Vladimir Djordjevic (producer)

Hello, Srbtiger. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vladimir Djordjevic (producer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vladimir Djordjevic (June 30)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Bkissin, left the following feedback:

This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:

• promotional language: see Words to watch;
• personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader;
• informal language.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

Notable as a member of the national assembly, but the wording in several parts here comes across as Wikipedia:Puffery or Wikipedia:Peacock terms.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Vladimir Djordjevic to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Bkissin (talk) 17:34, 30 June 2026 (UTC)