User talk:Spinmeisters

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hope You Do (Song) (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Brachy0008 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Here’s a tip: Try adding a critical reception. It should help the draft a bit and make it more likely to be accepted. Other than that, find more sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hope You Do (Song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brachy08 _(Talk) 09:05, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 3AM on Glenwood has been accepted

3AM on Glenwood, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lopifalko (talk) 10:47, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hope You Do (Song) has been accepted

Hope You Do (Song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:39, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Entertainment (loso album).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Entertainment (loso album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Red Album (Loso album) (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Herald were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Red Album (Loso album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:37, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Spinmeisters! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:37, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fire & Desire (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mach61 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

SongBPM and Old Time Music are unreliable sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fire & Desire and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mach61 (talk) 23:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: BackOutsideBoyz has been accepted

BackOutsideBoyz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheChineseGroundnut (talk) 18:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fire & Desire has been accepted

Fire & Desire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheChineseGroundnut (talk) 23:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sherane a.k.a Master Splinter’s Daughter has been accepted

Sherane a.k.a Master Splinter’s Daughter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GnocchiFan (talk) 19:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Good Kid (song) has been accepted

Good Kid (song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 12:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: From the Westside with Love Three has been accepted

From the Westside with Love Three, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

K-Pop contributor (✍️•📚) 10:08, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Urban Flora has been accepted

Urban Flora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 20:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bars Mitzvah (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChineseGroundnut was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NMUSIC.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bars Mitzvah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

@T.C.G. [talk] 23:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: November 18th (song) has been accepted

November 18th (song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

@T.C.G. [talk] 19:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brilliant Sanity has been accepted

Brilliant Sanity, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 09:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bruno Mars - 24K Magic (song).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bruno Mars - 24K Magic (song).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bruno Mars - Count On Me.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bruno Mars - Count On Me.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bruno Mars Marry You.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bruno Mars Marry You.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bruno Mars Talking to the Moon.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bruno Mars Talking to the Moon.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bruno Mars Versace on the Floor.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bruno Mars Versace on the Floor.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:The Chauffeur has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Chauffeur. Thanks! Wikishovel (talk) 07:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bruno Mars & David Guetta - Versace on the Floor.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bruno Mars & David Guetta - Versace on the Floor.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:The Chauffeur has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Chauffeur. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shot for Me (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cocobb8 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not have references that show WP:SIGCOV about the song itself (not the album) to meet WP:NSINGLE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shot for Me and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 20:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shot for Me has been accepted

Shot for Me, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chetsford (talk) 04:11, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on King of the Mischievous South, Vol. 2

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page King of the Mischievous South, Vol. 2, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

AOTY: Death of slim shady

if they have a critics section it should be counted, especially when you click on the critics there is a list (Telegraph, Sputnik, etc) MusicGene (talk) 17:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Other than that aoty is completely dependent on users just like wikipedia, how we list critical reception, we just don't make our own music aggregator Spinmeisters (talk) 21:41, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Correct. but considering that they are a legitimate critic reviewed website (like MC) they are able to be used. If you look at the cite it shows "Critics Score" then if you click on it it lists the same amount of legitimate critic reviews as MC. MusicGene (talk) 21:48, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

i can't really deny your claim, though metacritic's sole purpose is to aggregate a variety of entertainment while aoty is driven by a community, essentially a free dictionary [that anyone can edit] of every release known to man, you can find the most obscure albums contributed by a single person. Whether aoty is notable or not, we don't normally cite sources that anyone can edit, see Wikipedia:Citing Wikipedia and tertiary sources. Spinmeisters (talk) 22:29, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

not sure how you can edit critics reviews/ratings on AOTY cause I'm on the site now and its not allowing me to do any of that MusicGene (talk) 22:51, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

On the site you can add critic scores, all while featuring their own aggregator. That being said aoty is just a huge collection of any music release notable or not that anyone can add to. Spinmeisters (talk) 23:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

@MusicGene: There was a consensus not to use Album of the Year, hence why it is listed at WP:ALBUMAVOID. Ss112 04:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

oh thank you i was unaware of that MusicGene (talk) 14:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

thank you Spinmeisters (talk) 00:21, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Please stop marking large additions of content as minor edits

Hello. Please stop marking every one of your edits, including large removals or additions of content (e.g. , , , ) as minor edits because they are not. Please see Help:Minor edit for what a minor edit is. It's a change of either no or a few bytes of information. Ss112 04:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

my bad, i tend to label most of my edits as minor but i guess most of them aren't now that i think about it. Spinmeisters (talk) 07:56, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Your edit to Duran Duran (1993 album) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:49, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Red Album (Loso album)

Hello, Spinmeisters. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Red Album".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:13, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bars Mitzvah

Hello, Spinmeisters. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bars Mitzvah, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bruno Mars - That's What I Like.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bruno Mars - That's What I Like.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viva Tu has been accepted

Viva Tu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hey man im josh (talk) 14:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clandestino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mano Negra. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lonestar Luchador

Hello, Spinmeisters. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lonestar Luchador, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Hip Hop Barnstar

		The Hip Hop Award
		Thank you for your contributions to King of the Mischievous South, Vol. 2. I would like to award you the Hip Hop Barnstar.

RTSthestardust (talk) 20:00, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Class of 95 (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

At present, you have one source that establishes notability, which is what we use to determine which articles should be on Wikipedia. To establish notability, the source needs to be reliable and independent, and have significant coverage of the subject. The RapReviews source does that. Can you find 1-2 more reviews?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Class of 95 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Could this Uproxx article be used? It’s currently being used on the album now.

https://uproxx.com/music/the-best-new-hip-hop-this-week-cordae-glorilla-lil-durk/ Spinmeisters (talk) 02:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Class of 95 (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Beachweak was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Passing mentions in articles do not meet the guidelines for significant coverage; this article still requires more sources before it can be published. More reviews would work great.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Class of 95 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Beachweak (talk) 12:44, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

the only review that exists is the rapreviews article unfortunately, but I think I can make a background section with further reliable sources if that improves it. Spinmeisters (talk) 03:33, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Entertainment (Loso album)

Hello, Spinmeisters. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Entertainment (Loso album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Compton (song) has been accepted

Compton (song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Frost 10:28, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pisces Iscariot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Skinny.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Pisces Iscariot

Your "Songs" section split the information about the songs in half. Why have half of the song information under "Composition" and half under "Songs"? It makes no sense. hbent (talk) 15:10, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

My thought process was that regarding the origins of the songs like writing and recording would go under the background and history section I made. I separated the other songs section because it was about them musically, thus going under composition. I don’t think them being together would all fit into one section. What do you recommend? Spinmeisters (talk) 22:59, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Regarding changing all of the album dates to remove the start date template, I initially changed it due to it showing the album's year as "160" in the chronology at the time, which seems to have been fixed a day later. Spinmeisters (talk) 21:40, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Ordinary World Original Version.jpeg

The file File:Ordinary World Original Version.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Screenshot of wedding band in original cut of music video inadequately supported by critical commentary. Not proven contextually significant to the song or subject of discussion in question.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. George Ho (talk) 01:25, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Class of 95 (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a ways there to meeting notability, but WP:NALBUM suggests multiple sources covering the subject matter in detail. I'm concerned that the only source that critically has covered this album is RapReviews. Are there other sources out there that have evaluated the album? WP:A/S and its linked search engine is a good resource to hunt for more sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Class of 95 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 06:04, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hold Back the Rain (April 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Rio (Duran Duran album). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hold Back the Rain and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:07, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Change (In the House of Flies), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bass Player.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bored (Deftones song) has been accepted

Bored (Deftones song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

λ NegativeMP1 16:50, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Hold Back the Rain has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hold Back the Rain. Thanks! Rambley (talk) 11:56, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, just a reminder to check out this comment since I'd love to see it get accepted. Rambley (talk) 10:56, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

I'm aware. Spinmeisters (talk) 17:34, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 7 Words has been accepted

7 Words, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rambley (talk) 09:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hold Back the Rain has been accepted

Hold Back the Rain, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:15, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Late Bar has been accepted

Late Bar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 01:23, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: My Antarctica has been accepted

My Antarctica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

gobonobo ^{+ c} 01:26, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lonestar Luchador

Hello, Spinmeisters. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lonestar Luchador".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:43, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Purple

Hey Spinmeisters. Thanks for your recent edits on Purple but don't assume sources are unreliable. Classic Rock Review and Sydney Unleashed are used on many articles. I found this on the former's reliability. There's no conclusion on Sydney Unleashed, but it's used on Jack & Diane, a former Good Article nominee, With no discussion on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard, it seems both sources are reliable. CleoCat16 (talk) 22:23, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

I'm only familiar with established sources, my mistake. It seems that CRR is reliable based on what you provided, but I don't know about Sydney Unleashed. I noticed that you can actually pay to have your own article published there . I wouldn't consider a source like that in any way reliable. Spinmeisters (talk) 05:05, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: My Mind Is a Mountain has been accepted

My Mind Is a Mountain, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 08:39, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Around the Fur alt-cover

Hey Spinmeisters, would you mind uploading the alternative cover for Deftones' "Around the Fur" from advance copies of the album please? https://www.discogs.com/release/5038372-Deftones-Around-The-Fur/image/SW1hZ2U6MTAyNTQwOTI= 2A02:C7C:E4F8:F800:48CA:633A:6EDC:DD5 (talk) 00:11, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Done. Spinmeisters (talk) 00:57, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much! 2A02:C7C:E4F8:F800:48CA:633A:6EDC:DD5 (talk) 01:39, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Night Boat has been accepted

Night Boat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 01:06, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:BillieJeanUK.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:BillieJeanUK.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. George Ho (talk) 17:41, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ceremony (Deftones song) has been accepted

Ceremony (Deftones song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 04:37, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

Deftones

I give you a heartfelt thank you for your work on Deftones' singles, as an avid fan and the original GA nominator for the band's biography. (It's seen better days, but it's not in the worst of shape.) I just wanted to ask out of curiosity, do you plan on eventually righting the great wrong that led to "Sextape" getting redirected? I would be very excited at the thought of one of the band's de facto greatest successes post-nu metal era finally getting the recognition it deserves. mftp dan ^oops 01:42, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the kind words, I really appreciate it. I have always been interested in creating an article for "Sextape", which I never knew existed at one point until now because I never checked. What's holding me back is that i'm not sure there's enough reliable coverage to build a solid article around it, despite it being one of their biggest songs today. It's clearly notable, those certifications alone make that obvious, but without sufficient sources it's hard to do it justice. By comparison, a song like "Be Quiet and Drive (Far Away)" has relatively strong coverage that would make expansion much more straightforward (though it hasn't been done yet). In general, whenever I see a song with enough sourcing potential, i'm more than likely to create an article for it / expand it. Spinmeisters (talk) 03:23, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

I'd happily help gather what sources I can; I'm not always the best at that but last I looked I was able to scrape up a few to start with. mftp dan ^oops 04:43, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Just wanna say I checked in on Deftones today and I am proud of what I see. Fantastic work, keep it up. mftp dan ^oops 03:06, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Do you have plans on taking any of your work to good article nomination? I think your work might be fit for it, especially Sextape. mftp dan ^oops 14:39, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: None of the Above (song) has been accepted

None of the Above (song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 02:09, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Drowning Man (Duran Duran song) has been accepted

Drowning Man (Duran Duran song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Agent 007 (talk) 18:26, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Class of 95 has been accepted

Class of 95, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Shocksingularity (talk) 01:51, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sextape (song) has been accepted

Sextape (song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 23:27, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your work on Sextape (song)! – AllCatsAreGrey (talk) 23:06, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AroundtheFurAdvance.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AroundtheFurAdvance.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:06, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sin of the City has been accepted

Sin of the City, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 19:46, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

AI

Hi - are you using AI tools for your edits here? If so, please disclose:

• What tool(s) you are using, and what version
• The prompts, process, features, etc. you are doing
• What review, if any, you are doing of the output and of the sources

Thank you. Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:19, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Love Voodoo has been accepted

Love Voodoo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HwyNerd Mike (t | c) 16:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Man In The Box CD.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Man In The Box CD.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Beatles Get Back (1969).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beatles Get Back (1969).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Duran Duran Tribute Album

Hello, Spinmeisters. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Duran Duran Tribute Album, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Duran Duran Tribute Album

Hello, Spinmeisters. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Duran Duran Tribute Album".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:42, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bring on the Psychics

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modifications organiques (talk) 12:39, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Bring On the Psychics moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bring On the Psychics. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and The references are almost all PR churnalism. This shoudl not have been moved to mainspace, and I am returning it to draft. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 08:29, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

I understand your concerns, but I think it was premature to move it back to draft only a few hours after the album's release, as there was very little opportunity for independent reviews to be published and incorporated into the article while it remained in mainspace. As of writing this, I have already found a few critical reviews that establish the album's notability aside from promotional material, which I have added. Because those reviews appeared so soon after the release, I feel the article may have been returned to draft before it had a reasonable chance to be improved with the kinds of sources you were looking for. From what I have seen in articles for upcoming projects already in the mainspace, notability can be established if there is enough prerelease coverage by reliable sources (an example I looked to while making my draft was the article for Paul McCartney's most recent album The Boys of Dungeon Lane, which was in the mainspace for two whole months before it was released. But that may be because it's an album by one of the most acclaimed artists of all time guaranteed to top the charts). Spinmeisters (talk) 15:50, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bring On the Psychics has been accepted

Bring On the Psychics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 20:48, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Release date for "Glory Box"

I am very, very puzzled by this... I never heard of this single being released in September 1994, and it doesn't explain why it didn't chart until four months later. Not going to change it, because you have a reliable source, but I'm definitely wondering if the single was pulled at the last minute and then properly released in January 1995. I need to investigate this... Richard3120 (talk) 23:37, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

I checked the Music Week archives and found evidence showing a January 1995 release. In the 7 January 1995 issue on page 10/28, it states: "Bristol duo Portishead (pictured) have double reason for celebration this week with the release of their new single 'Glory Box' and the album 'Dummy' going silver with sales of more than 60,000." This aligns with the song's UK chart history rather than the 26 September 1994 release date. I would also like to point out that the single was featured in Music Week's market preview three times in 1994, the first in the 24 September issue, second in 8 October, and third in 12 November. I don't know if this would also suggest that the single release kept getting delayed alongside its first charting in January 1995. Spinmeisters (talk) 01:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

I know... I'm not saying you're wrong, because clearly some version of the song charted in the Record Mirror Club Chart in September 1994, and you have found reviews from the same month. But all these reviews seem to be for some dance remix of the song... I'm wondering if in September there were some vinyl remixes sent out to DJs for playing in clubs (very common practice), but the actual single was not made commercially available at that time. Then there seem to have been a few reviews in November... perhaps this is when the single was slated to come out, but was then pulled when Go Beat realised it was probably get lost in the Christmas rush, and they decided to wait until after Christmas instead. Another thing that seems strange to me is the video coming out in November... why would you put out a promo video if you had no product to promote at the time?

I'm just guessing here, because it's all very odd... I'm a Brit, and I was 24 at the time, so I was listening to music a lot. Despite not being big hits, I remember both "Numb" and "Sour Times" getting a lot of airplay and attention on the more alternative shows on BBC Radio 1... but I definitely don't remember hearing "Glory Box" being played until January 1995. I've also been checking the music press from that time – the original release of "Sour Times" was favourably reviewed end of July/beginning of August in Music Week, NME (full page advert for the single as well) and Melody Maker (who made it their single of the week), and everyone went crazy over Dummy when it was released at the end of August. So you would have thought that if "Glory Box" came out the following month, there would have been a lot of attention from the same magazines. And yet... absolutely nothing.

The only thing I can say with certainty is that "Glory Box" was released on 2 January 1995... reviews of the single in the music press and the chart dates in various countries confirm this. What I can't say is whether it had already been released in some format back in 1994. Richard3120 (talk) 03:04, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

The "Glory Box" single featured remixes or other versions of the song as its B-side ("Toy Box", "Scorn", "Sheared Box") if you didn't know already, so those are probably the mixes that sources are referring to. I also noticed that the song charted in the Record Mirror Club Chart in the 24 September issue as "Glory Box (mixes)", the same week of the supposed commercial release. Whether or not the commercial release date of 26 September is correct, the entry on the chart shows that a previous type of single was available, but not commercially, as that would be January 1995. On that same chart, what I didn't notice initially was that there is a key for the charted songs that indicates if an entry is a "highest climber" (triangle) or "promo/white label" (star). Some entries have no symbols. The Record Mirror Club Chart indicated "Glory Box (mixes)" as a "promo/white label", showing that there was definitely a promotional/white label single out in 1994. I hope that answers your questions. Spinmeisters (talk) 04:03, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

I think you've confirmed my suspicions... that the September 1994 release of the song was just a white label, not an official release, and the single didn't come out officially until January 1995. I'm not going to change anything on the article right now because we don't have enough to confirm this, but maybe we should think about adding a line saying that the single was released (again?) in January, which would explain the 1995 chart dates to the casual reader. Thanks for your help and investigation. Richard3120 (talk) 17:51, 2 September 2026 (UTC)