User talk:SleepyRedHair

Again, its an coversation with me and small help.

Hi, @SleepyRedHair. Like always, I don't want to disturb. I'm doing my own things mainly at a very snail's pace in making progress on the nominations of Baldi's Basics and Mao Mao. Knowing your efforts at making Angry Birds: The Movie GA nominated. I want to give a rather useful source of info for the movie's development. It can be found via the book "The Art of the Angry Birds Movie" (also found online in full here (albeit in pretty low resolution).

If you fall to desire contact, feel free! Thanks!! SI Moon Grubisz440 (talk) 17:05, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Hiya! Thanks a ton for the source, I'll see if I can work it in before someone comes to start the review. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 17:14, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Ok, but I have another small but helpful thing that may streamline the process, if you want to cite the same source multiple times, for instance, a page in a book or video game manual. This thing I found thanks to observation of other users, like Cat's Tuxedo (and most likely other users).

How is work: So, you must at the start create a "Bibliography" list below the "References" list and create a "Template" and generate "Cite book". Then write down known information about the author, publisher, Date, Title as well as the URL, if it is accessible online. At that same template find "Ref", an anchor identifier, and add [Sfnref|Author last name|Year] ((these } and, { must be on the very side to work too, not counting ] and, [ )) Which just serves as a footnote.

Next, use Template "Sfn" for the source and add "Author last name" and "Second author or year" and the "page" for the relevant information in this source. The page section needs to be written for the corresponding footnote of Sfn. Also make sure that they match with Cite book template to avoid errors that may occur after you make an edit!

In the end, is it really needed for the Angry Birds movie? In my opinion, yes. Not only does it look less jarring for the reader to see a visible manual page number or timestamp like the "Reference page" Template. It is also very useful for other articles that have more than one book or video game manual (or, in some cases, interviews), for instance, in Toy Story or the first Crash Bandicoot, or Crash 4.

Oh, and since "The Art of The Angry Birds Movie" does include details of how the film's world-building and characters were made, if possible, you can include some details in the article, with maybe an additional image of one of the concept art pieces for the movie's article.

I know that's a lot, and I may have messed up some details, but I think I've got the point. Yet again, thanks you very much! SI Moon Grubisz440 (talk) 20:45, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

I'm not sure how else to use the artbook source since, while I would like an Animation subsection in Production, I don't think it's worth adding if the artbook will be the only source there (I've checked quite a lot of sources online and found nothing animation/design-related). This is definitely useful information though, I will keep this in mind. Thanks again! Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 20:55, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Sorry for my oversight. In here, my point with the Angry Birds book was it included some comments from artists and directors when designing characters or scenes. Not sure how it might fit into the article, but we'll experiment with it and see if it will have more of a useful implication. For other forms of sources from the book, they can be downloaded via PDF file (for high quality) or can be looked up online via videos for the other form of overview.

Thanks, yet again! SI Moon Grubisz440 (talk) 21:16, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi, @SleepyRedHair, I forgot to say! Congratulations on getting The Angry Birds Movie to be GA nominated; guess my tips and advice were really worth it! Thought I know you'll continue finishing other Angry Birds games articles. I only have one question: Will you consider making The Angry Birds Movie 2 and The Angry Birds Movie 3 a GA nomination?

Fell free to anwser (as I can help you if it's needed or you want to)! Thanks! SI Moon Grubisz440 (talk) 19:19, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Good article nominations RfC

Hi SleepyRedHair,

There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.

By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.

Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox^{(talk|contributions)} 16:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Percy the Small Engine

Hello, SleepyRedHair. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Percy the Small Engine".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:01, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of The Angry Birds Movie has passed

Your good article nomination of the article The Angry Birds Movie has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Yovt -- Yovt (talk) 23:07, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Angry Birds Movie

Hello! Your submission of The Angry Birds Movie at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dreamyshade (talk) 05:52, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

DYK for The Angry Birds Movie

On 27 August 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Angry Birds Movie, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Angry Birds Movie was written by a former writer for The Simpsons? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Angry Birds Movie. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (The Angry Birds Movie), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Z1720 (talk) 12:02, 27 August 2026 (UTC)

Troll comment at Talk:Super Mario Odyssey

FYI, I think that you should've just removed the TA's talk page discussion at Talk:Super_Mario_Odyssey#Final_Game instead of engaging with it. I think it's pretty obviously a troll and we shouldn't have given it recognition. The viewpoint is completely unreasonable, has no source or basis, and was made by a user who previously vandalized the article. I also don't think that talk page discussion should've resumed after the archival. @Sergecross73 and Panini!:, pinging y'all about this too. λ NegativeMP1 22:32, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

I generally prefer archiving/closing over outright removal unless it's really offensive stuff, which it really wasn't. Sergecross73 msg me 23:53, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

and I'm just the fun uncle, but your point is valid Panini! • 🥪 01:30, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

I fully understand, and I apologise if I took the wrong course of action. I must've not recognised it as a troll comment (still doesn't seem like one to me), I guess my OCD told me that I had to correct this person or talk some sense into them or something. Simply removing it would've felt more like silencing in this scenario, with how that person seems to actually think the stuff they said is plausible, and in my experience it likely would've led to them just re-adding the section. I'll take your comment into account moving forward. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 10:47, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

Regarding the unreliable sources tag on the Sonic The Hedgehog: The Movie page

I saw that you recently added an unreliable sources tag to the Sonic The Hedgehog: The Movie page. I was wondering if there were any particular sources that you had in mind that you feel should be removed?

(User talk: zictor23) 11:54, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

There's quite a few sources that could be considered unreliable, and I'm afraid it's pretty much most of the sources used. Specifics include MichealDVD, VHS Collector, NintendoWire (which is listed as unreliable at WP:VG/UNREL), Twitter, zhihu.com, and Sonic Stadium. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 13:17, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ZeldaMovie.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ZeldaMovie.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Draft:Millennium Falcon (Lego)

Hello SleepyRedHair, just leaving you a quick note. You marked a draft I was working on as promising. I just received the 1 month warning prior to the G13, I thought I'd pass the warning along to you in case you were interested. Sorry I wasn't able to see this draft through on my own at the moment.

All the best, Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 19:05, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I'll see what contributions I can make. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 11:35, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Congratulations on getting Good Article Nomination on The Angry Birds Movie!!

Hi, @SleepyRedHair, I forgot to say! Congratulations on getting The Angry Birds Movie to be GA nominated; guess my tips and advice were really worth it! Thought I know you'll continue finishing other Angry Birds games articles. I only have one question: Will you consider making The Angry Birds Movie 2 and The Angry Birds Movie 3 a GA nomination?

Fell free to anwser (as I can help you if it's needed or you want to)! Thanks! SI Moon Grubisz440 (talk) 19:21, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the congrats, your advice did in fact help. I do plan to make the same improvements to a few more Angry Birds articles (e.g. Space, Classic, Seasons, Reloaded), and I also plan to redo Movie 2's cast section and continue to monitor Movie 3. Maybe there'll be more Angry Birds GAs, but we'll just have to see. You're welcome to contribute yourself, btw. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 11:33, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Untitled Sonic the Hedgehog game

Hello, SleepyRedHair. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Untitled Sonic the Hedgehog game".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:24, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Thomas & Friends ref from Sunderland Echo

Not sure if usefull (I'm not sure where to put it) Timur9008 (talk) 09:28, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Not related but I think you should archive your talk page. (it's getting hard to navigate) Timur9008 (talk) 09:33, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for showing me this, I'll keep it in mind and see if I can use it in an article. Also yes, I have been meaning to archive my talk page for a while now, I just need to figure out how. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 12:00, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

New cross-language page link: Thomas & Friends: Big World! Big Adventures!

A new page Thomas og vennene hans: Stor verden! Store eventyr! on the Norwegian Wikipedia has been linked to page Thomas & Friends: Big World! Big Adventures!, which you created, via Wikidata (Q48764045).

You will not be notified in the future about new articles linked to any of the articles you have created, if you wish to opt-in to receiving these notifications, please follow the opt-in instructions.

NervousBot (talk) 02:30, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Nintendo Switch 2

Hello SleepyRedHair, I'm EduardBS22. I wrote the paragraph of the videogames of Nintendo Switch that improved with the extra power of the Nintendo Switch 2.

Why you eliminated my paragraph? It was important because talk about retrocompatibility and I used reliable sources to show it.

If this doesn't bother you I want to wrote the same paragraph again in the article. I truly believe that is important information and that inform about the capacities of the Nintendo Switch 2.

This is all, thanks. EduardBS22 (talk) 22:07, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

I did not remove your addition. I rewrote it and moved it into the first sentence. No offence, it's just that the grammar wasn't exactly the quality expected from Wikipedia. I also expanded the source you cited to add missing details such as the website, an archive link, and the authors. I think it is worth noting too, which is why I never deleted it at all. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 06:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Ok thanks. And about my grammar I write it avoiding the use of the translator because this year I achieve the B2 english and I wanted to show that I can write english well without the translator. Out of there, thanks again and have a nice day. EduardBS22 (talk) 06:47, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SonicGalactic.png

A tag has been placed on File:SonicGalactic.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can request undeletion. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:58, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Colors Live 2

The source to Colors Live 2's announcement can be found at https://www.colorslive.com/news ~2026-53039-04 (talk) 20:08, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

I've readded the Colors Live 2 info with that source. A non-primary source is probably recommended. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 20:45, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Something to ask

I noticed that when you reverted my edits, it appears that you don't really like this kind of formatting on Wikipedia: [[Page|page name]]. Is this true by any chance? because i'm curious about it. Luigitehplumber (talk) 15:47, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

No, it's not at all that I just don't like it. It's just that the links you were redirecting either looked misleading, inaccurate, like it was violating WP:NOTBROKEN, or all of the above. You've been editing for 11 years so I'll assume your edits were in good faith.

Btw, this is unrelated, but I noticed you removed material from Draft:Thomas & Friends: Railway Stories for being unsourced... when it is verified by a source in the Release section. If what the source says ends up being untrue then I'll remove it and the material attatched, just wanted to let you know. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 17:33, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

For why I linked Infogrames to Atari, Inc. in the Thomas & Friends: Railway Adventures page, I felt like it was easier to link it there instead of what the Infogrames page redirects to (the holding company, not the publisher). As for the Thomas & Friends: The Great Festival Adventure page, Atari Interactive is the current name for the company for what used to be Hasbro Interactive and it links to there as a redirect anyway.

As for the The Railway Stories, I did notice in the end that it was sourced, but it didn't list a specific day, which is why I wasn't able to find the special on the schedule. But in honesty I should have checked (I have a really bad habit of quickly jumping into things at times on here). Luigitehplumber (talk) 19:34, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Oh, just to inform you, you misread the source, that explains why I wasn’t able to find yesterday's date on the Channel 5 website for the special, it was because the source was referring to 5 (Channel 5), the television channel which Milkshake! airs on. Luigitehplumber (talk) 12:59, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Oh you're right, I didn't realise it said "in" and thought it said "on". My mistake, and thank you for correcting it. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 15:19, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

You're welcome. Luigitehplumber (talk) 16:35, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Regarding Thomas & Friends: Railway Stories

During credits of that premiere special, you can see that several execs from Mattel UK are listed here despite being a Mattel Studios project is there any way to figure this out? SBF2004 (talk) 15:12, 23 October 2026 (UTC)

I'm afraid that might count as original research. The nationality should depend on that of the overall production company/companies, not some of the people who made it (per Template:Infobox television/doc). Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 15:18, 23 October 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ThomasRailwayStories.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ThomasRailwayStories.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:06, 24 October 2026 (UTC)