User talk:Ritzz07

JioTV redirect

Hi, This article JioTV redirects to Jio Platforms. JioTV is among the apps provided by Jio Platforms. How to delete this redirection from JioTV to JioPlatforms.

Source - https://www.jio.com/en-in/apps

--Ritzz07 (talk) 06:22, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

First, declare any conflicts of interest on your user page. Second, gather your sources. Third, follow the instructions at {{edit request}} and request an edit on the Talk:Jio Platforms. Fourth, if and only if you have enough substantial coverage in independent sources that are subject to editorial oversight, then you can split it over to Draft:JioTV. Then, use {{subst:submit}} to request a Articles for Creation reviewer to give you feedback. Hope that helped, Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 06:50, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

I've submitted Draft:JioTV for review, getting a review usually takes several weeks so one just needs to be patient. If you're being paid for you contributions to Wikipedia, you'll have to add a mention of that on your userpage (see WP:PAID). – Thjarkur (talk) 12:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: JioTV (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Jio Platforms. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.

This draft does not show how this division of Jio Platforms is sufficiently notable to need a separate article. This information can be included in the main article.

This draft has been declined because of notability concerns. This draft should be resubmitted by addressing the notability concerns in AFC comments or on the talk page of the draft. Do not resubmit this draft without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion. Do not simply add references, or make minor changes, without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JioTV and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:JioTV, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:47, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Ritzz07! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:47, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Do not tell a reviewer to use Google search to look for references. It is the responsibility of the submitter to provide the references. Telling a reviewer to search for the references is asking the reviewer to write the article for you, and is insulting the reviewer.

Tell your managers to find an employee to do their paid editing who doesn't insult the reviewers. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:43, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Draft Declined Because of Notability Concerns

Hi! this draft:JioTV has been declined because of notability concerns. I have added more notable references in order to fix this and added the explanation in a comment. I would really appreciate if someone can have a look at this draft. After then I'll resubmit this for review. Thank You --Ritzz07 (talk) 07:29, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

You may wish to ask for help with this at the Articles for Creation Help Desk. Seagull123 Φ 12:07, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks User talk:Seagull123 --Ritzz07 (talk) 13:10, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

@Ritzz07 and Seagull123: This is practically a re-submission: Asking someone (implying: a reviewer) to have another look. Well, that's what the "submit" button is for. Neither the "help me" template nor the help desk are appropriate for queue skipping. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:34, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

(I have now submitted the article on your behalf, but do feel free to continue editing it while waiting. If you would like to undo the submission, you can click , but I personally do not recommend to do so, as the queue is indeed very long, and as you do seem to look for an independent reviewer's second opinion about the new state of the article.) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you ~ ToBeFree I am sure I'll learn wikipedia soon--Ritzz07 (talk) 12:03, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ritzz07! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Review Draft Article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:JioTV has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:JioTV. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:JioTV has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:JioTV. Thanks! Noahfgodard (talk) 03:59, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

(me too) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: JioTV (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Scope creep were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I undertook an examination of the first 12 references. These are run of the mill business news that don't indicate the app is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JioTV and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:JioTV, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 07:22, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Asking the reviewers to highlight the portions of your draft that are not neutral, or otherwise to highlight portions of your draft for you to edit, is a fancy way of trying to demand that the unpaid reviewers do your paid editing for you. Wikipedia is neutrally written. You have the privilege of editing Wikipedia. You do not have the right or the privilege to demand that Wikipedia's volunteer editors do your work for you. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: JioTV (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

JioTV is a division of Jio Platforms. We already have an article on Jio Platforms. Any additional information about JioTV can be added to the article on Jio Platforms.

This draft is a request to spin off an article. Proposals to spin out a topic from an article into another stand-alone article should be discussed at the talk page of the existing article, unless the draft satisfies a special notability guide. If the draft satisfies a special notability guide, please identify the notability criterion with a reliable source.

This does not mean that the draft should be spun off, and it does not mean that the draft should not be spun off. It does mean that discussion should be on the talk page of the existing article, Talk:Jio Platforms]. (If this draft is resubmitted without discussion on the talk page of the existing article and does not satisfy a special notability guide, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.)

See also Wikipedia is not a TV guide.

Discuss any proposed changes to or expansion of Jio Platforms at Talk:Jio Platforms. Discuss any proposed split of JioTV at Talk:Jio Platforms.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Jio Platforms. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JioTV and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:JioTV, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:JioTV

Hello, Ritzz07. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:JioTV, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 26 October 2021 (UTC)