User talk:Rander4675

September 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Johnuniq (talk) 02:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Can you remove my user page text, it embarrasses me Rander4675 (talk) 18:26, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

what happened Rander4675 (talk) 16:31, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

So, to be very clear, you are incapable of following the instructions. Is that correct? --Yamla (talk) 14:14, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

i am not incapable, I just want a more simple version of how to propose an edit Rander4675 (talk) 14:22, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

So, you cannot understand the instructions given. Correct? --Yamla (talk) 14:33, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

I probably could if given a few hours but it would be much easier if I got a simple version Rander4675 (talk) 14:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

its that proposing edits is much harder than normal edits Rander4675 (talk) 14:36, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Take your time. There's no rush. If you are unable to understand and/or follow the instructions, that's fine. It just means en.wikipedia.org isn't for you. If English is your native language, you might be happier at simple.wikipedia.org. If English is not your native language, please consider editing the version of your project in your own native language instead. If you want to give it a try here, slow down, carefully read and understand the instructions, and then attempt your example edit. Do not ask for the instructions to be simplified. This is part of the test. You are welcome to ask specific questions about specific parts of the instructions, but do not ask for the instructions to be dumbed down and do not ask such broad questions. --Yamla (talk) 14:38, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

okay Rander4675 (talk) 14:39, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Can you dum down the instructions, I cant understand them Rander4675 (talk) 13:13, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

No. The goal is to determine if you are able to understand and follow our policies and guidelines. You seem to be indicating you can't. That's fine, perhaps you would have more luck editing another site. --Yamla (talk) 13:35, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

no, I was just asking for a simplification of the prompt, I probably could understand it but it would be easier if I got like a version in a nutshell kinda like in the rule pages Rander4675 (talk) 13:54, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

i worded the original help request wrong Rander4675 (talk) 13:54, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

And to add to what I said, I do not need a simplification of the rules, but the part on how to propose an edit Rander4675 (talk) 13:59, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rander4675 (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

I sincerely regret what I did and want a second chance Rander4675 (talk) 18:28, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Just because you haven't edited (under this account) for six months, doesn't give you some automatic entitlement to a second chance.

Your userpage reads "Profesh Vandiliser adding accurite imfo", would you like to explain that? DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:50, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rander4675 (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

Yes, I used to be a Vandalizer, but does that mean I still am, is it impossible for people to change, I understand that I am not entitled to a second chance, But I still ask for one Rander4675 (talk) 18:59, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
• Reading our guide to improving articles.
• Picking any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.

Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
   • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}}),
   • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]),
   • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]),
   • and do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place {{reflist-talk}} at the end of the prose you have copied from the article;
5. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste an edit summary in the following form that specifies the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
6. Save the page by clicking Publish changes.
7. Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
8. When you are done with your work, save your edits, then re-request unblocking using {{unblock}}, and an administrator will review your proposed edits.

If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will hopefully improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 19:20, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts below previous posts, so they stay in order. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply". The reply feature is imperfect and doesn't work well in every situation. 331dot (talk) 19:20, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

This is a good question. If you are adding a new section, no need to copy anything from the article. Just tell us what article and where your new section would appear. For example, "I'm adding the following to Tachyon. It is a new section which will appear under Fields with non-canonical kinetic term. Here is my section." Remember, your suggested edit must be non-trivial and must be properly cited from a reliable source. See WP:CITE and WP:RS. --Yamla (talk) 16:50, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

the problem is I added grammar fixes and additional info in areas where info is lacking Rander4675 (talk) 18:05, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

(Redacted)

Added a new section as well as more information and did minor grammar check, this is my submission for unban, please understand that this is my first major edit. Rander4675 (talk) 18:11, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rander4675 (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

Yes, I used to be a Vandalizer, but does that mean I still am, is it impossible for people to change these days, I understand that I am not entitled to a second chance, But I still ask for one. I have finished the article required for unban Rander4675 (talk) 18:15, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. You did not follow the instructions. Your addition was entirely uncited and in any case, rife with grammatical mistakes. Specifically, you don't seem to understand how capital letters work. Additionally, you violated WP:COPYRIGHT by copying content without acknowledging where you copied it from. Nor did you properly follow the instructions to separate copying the content from making your changes, so your changes were substantially difficult to find. Please note any further copyright violations will result in you losing access to your talk page. You are free to make another attempt, but please do it correctly. Take your time, there's no rush. If it takes a week or a month or six months, that's fine. Yamla (talk) 18:35, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Help Needed

Rander4675 (talk) 16:33, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

See below. --Yamla (talk) 16:36, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

STOP

PLEASE STOP. READ THE INSTRUCTIONS. See how in step 2, you copy only part of a page and in step 5, you note where you copied from? And you don't make changes until step 7? You've repeatedly messed up each of those steps. You've repeatedly violated WP:COPYRIGHT. Additionally, you've repeatedly failed to properly cite (WP:CITE) your changes. You've violated WP:NOR. You've repeatedly shown you don't understand how to use capital letters. You've repeatedly shown you don't understand WP:RS. Look, all you are doing is showing conclusively it would be a mistake to unblock you. I'll leave you access to this talk page so you can make one more attempt. I very, very, very strongly urge you to take at least a week, read the instructions that were posted at least five times, and then follow the instructions exactly, step by step. If you mess this up one more time, you'll lose access to your talk page. --Yamla (talk) 16:35, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

OBJECTION, MY CLIENT DID NOT COPY A SINGLE THING EVEN ONCE, HE QUADRUPLE CHECKED HIS GRAMMAR AND USED RELIABLE RESOURCES

(yes I hired a lawyer)

-- Rander4675 (talk) 17:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Be careful of WP:NLT. And this is utter and complete nonsense. You copied content from two other Wikipedia articles. Indeed, you were directed to do so, just not in the way you did. Please stop spouting nonsense. --Yamla (talk) 17:47, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

okay sorry Rander4675 (talk) 17:54, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Help Needed

Will it count if I build an article from the ground up, I noticed that a software that I am really familiar in has no article Rander4675 (talk) 17:43, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

This is much more difficult to get right than adding a paragraph or so to an existing article. I very, very, very strongly advise you don't take this approach. I can't stop you, but you are virtually guaranteed to fail. --Yamla (talk) 17:49, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Oh how I love a challenge Rander4675 (talk) 18:10, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Article Creation Needed

Can you create the article Makecode so I can upload the required images Rander4675 (talk) 12:55, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

No. You are blocked and cannot create articles, nor should you request people edit on your behalf. I once again incredibly strongly recommend you follow the instructions provided rather than attempting to create a whole new article here. You are all but guaranteed to fail. You've demonstrated you don't understand how to suggest edits here, creating a new article is an order of magnitude more difficult. --Yamla (talk) 12:58, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

@Yamla You don't understand, I am very experienced with the software I want to write about, I have been using it for years and I know the ins and outs, not to mention that I am getting help from the entire community of Makecode. Rander4675 (talk) 13:14, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Make sure you are definitely not copying anything provided to you by the community of Makecode. That would immediately result in losing access to this talk page. Again, you will all but certainly fail if you attempt this, but you are permitted to go ahead. I expect you to stop using the help-me template, though. You've had more than enough help. --Yamla (talk) 13:19, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

thank you Rander4675 (talk) 13:20, 31 March 2025 (UTC)