User talk:Normal rookie

December 2025

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Normal rookie (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

I will follow the guildlines of wikipedia, I will state the edit summary and I will not revert somebody works, except vandalism. The incident started that I tried to revert a vandalism, but I mistaken thought there is a conflict involved in vandalism due to I use my phone, not my laptop so I can't properly look.

Decline reason:

Your unblock request does not fill me with confidence that the competence issues have been resolved. PhilKnight (talk) 05:08, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Normal rookie (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

In November, the incident started that I tried to revert a vandalism, but I mistaken thought there is a conflict involved in vandalism due to I use my phone, not my laptop so I can't properly look. Secondly, Throughout my career, I am carefully following every guildances provided by wikipedia. Thirdly, this is the firstime I facing this situation, through these day I learnt my mistake and I will not repeat again. Therefore, I am sincerely request unblock on my account.

Decline reason:

We are not responsible for the device that you choose to access Wikipedia with. It's up to you to properly edit regardless of the device you are using at the time. As said above, I see no pathway forward without the standard offer. 331dot (talk) 09:19, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) Hi again, please read through my last post by clicking here, if you keep making appeals that are rejected you might lose access to your Talk page. Things have gone past an apology and saying you won't cause problems, you need physical proof to back up what you say.

You need that proof that you've learned how to edit properly and won't make the same mistakes, you can get that by working on a different Wikipedia project.

Also please be careful, the six month time limit on the WP:Standard offer starts from your last edit, so these appeals might count as editing and make the time limit longer. Blue Sonnet (talk) 11:52, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Normal rookie. Borgenland (talk) 17:21, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

January 2026

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Normal rookie (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

I will follow the guildlines of wikipedia, I will state the edit summary and I will not revert somebody works, except vandalism.

Decline reason:

Six month timer reset. We don't want to hear from you again until 2026-07-23. At that point, you'll need to show at least six months of editing, problem-free, on another wikimedia project. You'll need to explain what a WP:0RR restriction is and how you'll adhere to it going forward, and you'll have to explain what specific steps you have taken to ensure the technical issue won't reoccur, or indicate that you were attempting to mislead us about the technical issue. I want to be incredibly clear. ZERO EDITS here. I was tempted to extend the wait time to a year, given how much time you've wasted so far. Yamla (talk) 11:14, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) Are you absolutely sure that you want to reset the six-month limit with this appeal, because it's no different to the other appeals that were deemed insufficient and rejected above? Blue Sonnet (talk) 05:01, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Yes, because I feel boring always edit in Malay wiki and chinese wiki. I want go back to english wiki as fast I can. I know is a small chance I will appeal successfull, but I try to do it. Normal rookie (talk) 05:20, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Ok, as long as you understand that I feel this is unlikely to succeed, because you've not had enough time to build up a good history of editing elsewhere and your appeal is too brief.

I just want you to be fully aware that this will set your six-month standard offer back by a whole month. It's currently five months away (June 2026), but this will set it back to the full six (July 2026).

If you understand this and want to go ahead anyway, I wish you luck. Blue Sonnet (talk) 05:55, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you Normal rookie (talk) 06:05, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Normal rookie (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

Hello. It has been six months since my block. I have taken time to understand Wikipedia's policies and the reasons for my block. The zero-revert rule (0RR) means a complete prohibition on reverts which as defined for the purpose of the three-revert rule. I recognize that some of my past actions did not meet Wikipedia's standards, and I regret those mistakes. If my block is lifted, I will focus on making constructive, policy-compliant edits, avoid the issues that led to my block, and work collaboratively with other editors. Thank you for considering my request.

Decline reason:

This unblock request appears to have been written by a chatbot using a large language model. The purpose of unblock requests is to determine whether you, the human operating this account, understand why you were blocked – not to test a chatbot's ability to tell us what we want to hear. A message written (or rewritten) by a chatbot can also cause you to sound like you're making empty promises. It is better to write the unblock request yourself. Please read through the guide to appealing blocks for more help. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:14, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Last time, you were asked, "what specific steps you have taken to ensure the technical issue won't reoccur, or indicate that you were attempting to mislead us about the technical issue". You haven't answered that question yet. Please do so immediately, to avoid your six month timer being reset. --Yamla (talk) 10:23, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the follow-up. I apologize for not answering this question directly earlier.

The specific steps I have taken to ensure the technical issue will not reoccur are:

1. I now use only one account and one editing session at a time.
2. I have tested my login status before editing and will verify which account is active before making any future edits.
3. I will avoid editing from shared devices or networks where account confusion could occur.
4. I reviewed Wikipedia’s policies on multiple accounts, logged-out editing, and technical issues to ensure I understand the requirements going forward.

I understand why my earlier explanation may have appeared insufficient. However, I was not attempting to mislead the community about the technical issue. My earlier responses were incomplete because I focused on describing what happened rather than describing the preventative measures I had taken afterward. I acknowledge that I should have provided these details immediately.

I take responsibility for the confusion caused by my previous explanations, and I understand that trust must be rebuilt through clear communication and future compliance with Wikipedia's policies. Normal rookie (talk) 10:35, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

According to gptzerome, this response was generated by an AI. Did you write every word yourself or did you use a chatbot? --Yamla (talk) 10:37, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

I write every word by myself with a little reference of AI. Normal rookie (talk) 10:38, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but the text above is drastically different from your normal text and this reply. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 13:50, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

I understand why that raised concerns. I just want to make the sentence more formal and structured manner because I understood the seriousness of the appeal. If I lose the appeal I have to wait other six month. I'm happy to answer any further questions directly. Normal rookie (talk) 14:31, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

It isn't the structure or formality that raises alarms, but the drastically variable English fluency, making it very easy to pick out which of your edits likely use LLMs and which ones do not. Your English is certainly good enough that you don't need LLMs to communicate, and anyone reviewing your unblock request will likely value honest, flawed English far more than polished AI collaborations. It's in your own interest to stay very far away from LLMs on English Wikipedia. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 00:38, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

I understand. In the other hand which means I am still in unblocking review? Normal rookie (talk) 02:13, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Yes, but it will almost certainly be declined. You are not allowed to use AI to contest your block. --Yamla (talk) 09:57, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Which mean I have to wait another six months? Normal rookie (talk) 11:27, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Normal rookie (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

I promise not write using AI as this is a human operating account. I am not making empty promises as In the past six months of block, I have reflect my mistake and understand the Wikipedia's policies and the reasons for my block. I also understand the zero-revert rule (0RR) means a complete prohibition on reverts which as defined for the purpose of the three-revert rule. In order to avoid edit conflict, I ensure that technical issue will not reoccur as I will examinate my internet status to make future edit. If my block is sucessfully lift, I will make constructive edits and not cause trouble with administrators. I hope this show of sincerity moves all the administrators to consider my unblock. Thank you. (This sentence is not using AI, is using my brain to construct out it.)

Decline reason:

As you guessed above, the failed AI request means that the 6 month timer has been reset. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:59, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why can't just approved it? I admit it is bad move to using AI to construct sentence. But my perspective point is faster getting unblock in english wikipedia. Can't just ignore it. With all due respect, it is very BORING in other wikipedia project, siting there and watch english wikipedia project vandalism with no one stop it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Normal rookie (talk • contribs) 14:20, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Why can't just approved it? I admit it is bad move to using AI to construct sentence. You have just answered your own question here. But my perspective point is faster getting unblock in english wikipedia. The fact you are willing to cut corners to get unblocked faster is exactly why your block is lasting longer. siting there and watch english wikipedia project vandalism with no one stop it Other people will stop it. Take time on those "boring" other projects to build a good, AI-free reputation, and then we can revisit this in six months. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:54, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

"Deputy Minister of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs (Malaysia))" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Deputy Minister of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs (Malaysia)) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 August 23 § Deputy Minister of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs (Malaysia)) until a consensus is reached. Duckmather (talk) 18:53, 23 August 2026 (UTC)