User talk:NielsenGW
Add topic
Nomination of Olga Homeghi for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olga Homeghi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Suspension of autopatrolled permission due to inactivity
[edit]
Hello NielsenGW. Following a request for comment in May 2025, the community has decided to implement an activity requirement for the autopatrolled permission. Because your account has not edited in the last three years, the autopatrolled permission has been removed from your account. This action is purely procedural and does not affect your ability to create articles; if you return to actively creating articles, you may request that the permission be restored through the normal process. When returning, please consider taking some time to re-familiarize yourself with common practices and how they may have changed over the past few years if you wish to request the permission back. Thank you for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and we hope to see you again soon. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
The article Sokulaid has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable - hasn't gained any significant amount of information since it was created in 2011 and "that it exists" can be covered by List of islands of Estonia.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Orxenhorf (talk) 04:54, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
The article Sitakare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Tiny, non-notable island with zero in-depth sources found except database listings. It's merely a point on a map. Other than the one picture added in 2023, the article hasn't been expanded in any way since creation in 2011.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Streetlampguy301 (talk) 02:28, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
The article Cryptographis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Extract from my comment on this page's Talk page: Cryptographis is a former genus of moths of the family Crambidae. Its type species, Cryptographis rogenhoferi Lederer, 1863 is a junior synonym of Palpita elealis (Walker, 1859).[1]
The species included have been placed in Cryptographis by a now blocked user (more precisely: their sockpuppet); the species have been added back in 2016, and without scientific justification. As Wikipedia is an important taxonomic source for various biodiversity databases, these erroneous species names have been included in the Catalogue of Life and accordingly in the Global Biodiversity Information Facility.
I started checking the current taxonomic statuses and generic placements for the species starting with letters A and B, following the Global Information System on Pyraloidea[2] (of which I am a co-author), and the results are as follows:
Cryptographis abruptalis (Snellen, 1895): a junior synonym of Diaphania praxialis (Druce, 1895) Cryptographis aclista (Meyrick, 1936): a junior synonym of Diaphania argealis (Walker, 1859) Cryptographis advenalis (Lederer, 1863): a junior synonym of Cydalima perspectalis Walker, 1859 Cryptographis albianalis (Hampson, 1918): now placed in Diaphania as Diaphania albianalis Cryptographis albicincta (Hampson, 1899): now placed in Diaphania as Diaphania albicincta Cryptographis albifascialis (Hampson, 1912): now placed in Diaphania as Diaphania albifascialis Cryptographis albifuscalis (Hampson, 1899): a junior synonym of Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859) Cryptographis andringitralis (Viette, 1960): placed in its original genus Diaphania as Diaphania andringitralis Cryptographis angustimarga: a misspelling of angustimargo Warren, 1914, a junior synonym of Palpita elealis (Walker, 1859) Cryptographis antillia (Munroe, 1960): placed in its original genus Diaphania as Diaphania antillia Cryptographis argealis (Walker, 1859): now placed in Diaphania as Diaphania argealis Cryptographis arguta (Lederer, 1863): now placed in Diaphania as Diaphania arguta Cryptographis aroalis (Schaus, 1920): now placed in Diaphania as Diaphania aroalis Cryptographis attigua (Hering, 1906): now placed in Diaphania as Diaphania attigua Cryptographis auricollis (Snellen, 1875): now placed in Diaphania as Diaphania auricollis Cryptographis auricostalis (Walker, 1862): a junior synonym of Diaphania argealis (Walker, 1859) Cryptographis aurogrisealis (Hampson, 1912): now placed in Diaphania as Diaphania aurogrisealis Cryptographis beckeri (Clavijo & Munroe, 1996): placed in its original genus Diaphania as Diaphania beckeri Cryptographis brevilinealis (Schaus, 1920): now placed in Diaphania as Diaphania brevilinealis Cryptographis brunneacollis (Schaus, 1920): now placed in Diaphania as Diaphania brunneacollis Cryptographis buscki (Dyar, 1914): a junior synonym of Diaphania hemicitralis (Hampson, 1912)
In essence: none of these name combinations with Cryptographis are valid, and Cryptographis itself is a synonym of Palpita. Himalayacetus (talk) 08:54, 18 July 2026 (UTC)
Vári, L.; Kroon, D. M.; Krüger, M. (2002). Classification and checklist of the species of Lepidoptera recorded in southern Africa. Chatswood: Simple Solutions. pp. i–xxii, 1–385.
Nuss, Matthias; Landry, Bernard; Mally, Richard; Vegliante, Francesca; Tränkner, Andreas; Bauer, Franziska; Hayden, James; Segerer, Andreas; Schouten, Rob; Li, Houhun; Trofimova, Tatiana; Solis, M. Alma; De Prins, Jurate & Speidel, Wolfgang (2003–2025). "GlobIZ search". Global Information System on Pyraloidea. Retrieved 2026-07-18.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Himalayacetus (talk) 16:01, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of Leemetikare for deletion
[edit]The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leemetikare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.Nomination of Vahelmisrahu for deletion
[edit]The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vahelmisrahu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulkkari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.New cross-language page link: Fortuneleptura
[edit]A new page Fortuneleptura on the Indonesian Wikipedia has been linked to your page Fortuneleptura via Wikidata (Q5472893).
You will not be notified in the future about new articles linked to any of the articles you have created, if you wish to opt-in to receiving these notifications, please follow the opt-in instructions.