User talk:NewAccount7295

Welcome!

Hi NewAccount7295! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 02:41, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rebrickable (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MelbourneIdentity was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rebrickable and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MelbourneIdentity (talk) 02:53, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, NewAccount7295! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MelbourneIdentity (talk) 02:53, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Rebrickable has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rebrickable. Thanks! MelbourneIdentity (talk) 16:11, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello NewAccount7295! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Reviewing draft, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello NewAccount7295! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Draft, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, NewAccount7295. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2–3 days of inactivity. Message added by VidanaliK (talk to me) (contributions) 00:07, 28 January 2026 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

AfC notification: Draft:Lego Juniors Create & Cruise has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lego Juniors Create & Cruise. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:00, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lego Studios MovieMaker set.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Lego Studios MovieMaker set.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please visit the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~2026-36939-5 (talk) 15:29, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: File:BrickLink Studio software.png

Hello NewAccount7295. I am just letting you know that I deleted File:BrickLink Studio software.png, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which didn't fit the page in question. Thank you. Arcticocean ■ 16:46, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi NewAccount7295. Thank you for your work on Bits N' Bricks. Another editor, 11WB, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

It would be good to include some more sources to demonstrate notability.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|11WB}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

11WB (talk) 00:10, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:ChrysGalley, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 14:32, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Lego City My City

The page Lego City My City has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:27, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Rebrickable

On 25 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rebrickable, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that users on Rebrickable create their own Lego designs and sell instructions for them? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rebrickable. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rebrickable), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 12:03, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

DYK for En rejse til månen

On 28 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article En rejse til månen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that En rejse til månen, a 1973 amateur film made with Lego, was not released publicly until forty years after it was created? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/En rejse til månen. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, En rejse til månen), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 00:02, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Brickit

Hello, NewAccount7295. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brickit, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:08, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BrickLink Designer Program.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BrickLink Designer Program.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Brickit

Hello, NewAccount7295. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Brickit".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:26, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lego City My City 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lego City My City 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lego Life Avatar Studio.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lego Life Avatar Studio.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Lego Life is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Lego Life is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of WhaleFarm -- WhaleFarm (talk) 20:06, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lego Vidiyo sets.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lego Vidiyo sets.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Lego Life is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Lego Life has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of WhaleFarm -- WhaleFarm (talk) 21:04, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Lego Life has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Lego Life has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of WhaleFarm -- WhaleFarm (talk) 17:04, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Please keep variety in mind

Hi there! Thank you for participating in building prep sets! As you continue, I wanted to give you a couple pointers. One is WP:DYKVAR, ensuring variety in sets. We should not have the same kind of hook in consecutive image slots, for example, as in Preps 7 and 1 where there are U.S. historic buildings in the image slot (diff, diff; I will move one). Another is to include a healthy balance of biographies. While we cannot fill more than half of a set with biography hooks, each set should have at least a few (since we have a large number of bio hooks) to prevent us from having to time out too many biographies. Thanks for keeping these in mind and thanks for your work in building preps! Dclemens1971 (talk) 12:07, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

A follow-up note on your comment here. Just because a hook has an approved image doesn't mean it has to go in an image slot. A hook cannot go into an image slot without an image, but we have far more images than image slots, so it's entirely a matter of promoter and queuer discretion (consistent with DYKVAR and other guidelines), and most hooks with approved images will eventually appear on the mainpage without the image. Hope this helps. Dclemens1971 (talk) 12:22, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

And a follow-up based on your latest promotions, per WP:DYKPBR please leave the image slot open in the bottom set in case a queue mover needs to move an image hook there from elsewhere. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:54, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Planet Zoo: South America Pack for merging into Planet Zoo

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Planet Zoo: South America Pack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be merged into Planet Zoo.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet Zoo: South America Pack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Axolitl (talk | contribs) 03:12, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Cities: Skylines - Snowfall for merging into Cities: Skylines

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cities: Skylines - Snowfall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be merged into Cities: Skylines.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cities: Skylines - Snowfall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Axolitl (talk | contribs) 12:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Please leave open hooks in the bottom prep set

See WP:DYKBOTTOMPREP — when you fill the bottom prep completely as you’ve done with the current one, it means queue movers have no place to “bump” hooks that need further discussion and instead must “pull” them. Thanks for your work building prep sets; please keep this guideline in mind as you continue to do so. Dclemens1971 (talk) 10:35, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

I noticed this too, and assumed their subsequent response was just a misunderstanding, but as I now see you had already informed NewAccount7295, I'm beginning to consider their editing increasingly disruptive. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:40, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

@AirshipJungleman29 I am sorry if the edits seemed disruptive. I will stop promoting all the hooks to the bottom prep. I took it as general advice rather than a set rule and was trying to fix the backlog. NewAccount7295 (talk) 16:12, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

You will not fix the backlog even if you manage to promote every single hook at WP:DYKNA. You have been told that several times, and you are now annoying the editors who can help fix the backlog. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:23, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

@AirshipJungleman29 From now on I will leave slots open in the bottom prep. I am sorry for any disruption potentially caused. NewAccount7295 (talk) 17:25, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

DYK: Please promote oldest first

Hi NewAccount, as previously requested at WT:DYK, could you please focus on the oldest articles first? Template:Did you know nominations/London Life Building was only nominated 3 days ago, and there are items that are 5 weeks old awaiting promotion to prep. I have not reverted, due to my involvement with the hook, but I would recommend considering a self-revert and promoting an older item. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:09, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

@Crisco 1492 I try to do a variety. Some new hooks. Some old hooks. Sometimes there are newer hooks which are more straightforward to promote and older ones which are more questionable. NewAccount7295 (talk) 01:56, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• DYKVAR is not related to the nomination date. It deals with the subject matter of the articles. In terms of promotion order, DYK prioritizes older nominations.

The specific guidance Dclemens1971 gave you was "Consider promoting from the oldest available hooks that meet the standards and that help create a varied set. (Obviously there are times to draw from newer hooks, for example if a set needs more balance than is available among the older hooks.)" In this instance, there were numerous building articles that have been waiting for promotion (Qeren Naftali fortress, Rauner Special Collections Library, Old State House (Boston), Robert C. Weaver Federal Building, and Old North Church are all 5 weeks old), and thus putting something through DYK within days of nomination is doing a disservice to other editors. Again, I would recommend slowing down and listening to what people are trying to tell you.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:20, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Good article nominations RfC

Hi NewAccount7295,

There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.

By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.

Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox^{(talk|contributions)} 16:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks

... for the invite. I like seeing restaurant articles created and expanded! I am currently focused on a few other articles, including Tulip Shop Tavern if you're interested, but I'll try to take a look at ones you've started recently. Happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:52, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

City Masterplan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to City Masterplan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and is a genuine case of WP:TOOSOON - there's no release date and no significant coverage given there's only a trailer and Steam page. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. VRXCES (talk) 02:53, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

@Vrxces and and are probably significant coverage. Perhaps not enough for mainspace but how are they for a start? NewAccount7295 (talk) 03:12, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

They are fine to include in the draft but in terms of depth, the substantive commentary that you can actually draw facts from is just that there's a trailer and Steam page. A lot of the content is the sources imagining and speculating what the game could be like and whether it will be competitive with other city-building titles. Looks cool though! VRXCES (talk) 04:06, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Lamplight Lounge

Hello! Your submission of Lamplight Lounge at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! HerBauhaus · talk 19:22, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:City Masterplan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:City Masterplan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of MonkeyJam for redirecting to David Perry

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MonkeyJam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be redirected to David Perry.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MonkeyJam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

11WB 💬 00:23, 26 August 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Lego Life

On 27 August 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lego Life, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lego Life. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Lego Life), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:53, 27 August 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Lego Vidiyo is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Lego Vidiyo is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Crisco 1492 -- Crisco 1492 (talk) 18:06, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Lego Vidiyo has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Lego Vidiyo has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Crisco 1492 -- Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:25, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Pym Test Kitchen

On 3 September 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pym Test Kitchen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the menu for Pym Test Kitchen has included a $100 sandwich? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pym Test Kitchen. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Pym Test Kitchen), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Launchballer 00:04, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of MonkeyJam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MonkeyJam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MonkeyJam (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Ighs (talk) 16:05, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Rebrickable is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Rebrickable is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Johnson524 -- Johnson524 (talk) 08:28, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Lego Vidiyo

Hello! Your submission of Lego Vidiyo at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! EvanTech10 (talk, contribs) ⚡ 15:42, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi NewAccount7295. Thank you for your work on Disneyland feral cats. Another editor, Hurricane Wind and Fire, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Based on the current information, I think this can easily be merged into Disneyland and I don't find much to add here. I'll leave you some time to work on it, but in one week, I'll come back and look at this and if there's not much more we can add I'll propose merging to Disneyland.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hurricane Wind and Fire}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire, why'd you decline my draft? (talk, contribs)🔥 23:22, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Rebrickable for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rebrickable is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebrickable until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Johnson524 23:27, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Rebrickable is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Rebrickable has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Johnson524 -- Johnson524 (talk) 23:47, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Light Brick Studio has failed

Your good article nomination of the article Light Brick Studio has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vrxces -- Vrxces (talk) 10:06, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Disneyland feral cats for merging into Disneyland

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disneyland feral cats is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be merged into Disneyland.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disneyland feral cats until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire, why'd you decline my draft? (talk, contribs)🔥 13:18, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Lamplight Lounge

On 6 October 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lamplight Lounge, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a Pixar-themed restaurant has a secret dining room? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lamplight Lounge. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Lamplight Lounge), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Pixar Place Hotel

On 11 October 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pixar Place Hotel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that each floor in a California hotel is themed after a movie? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pixar Place Hotel. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Pixar Place Hotel), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:03, 11 October 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Rebrickable has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Rebrickable has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Johnson524 -- Johnson524 (talk) 03:27, 12 October 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Lego Vidiyo

On 13 October 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lego Vidiyo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lego Vidiyo was described as TikTok, but for children? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lego Vidiyo. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Lego Vidiyo), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:03, 13 October 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Architecture Studio (Lego) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Architecture Studio (Lego) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ThadeusOfNazereth -- ThadeusOfNazereth (talk) 01:22, 13 October 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Architecture Studio (Lego) is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Architecture Studio (Lego) has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ThadeusOfNazereth -- ThadeusOfNazereth (talk) 01:41, 13 October 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Architecture Studio (Lego) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Architecture Studio (Lego) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ThadeusOfNazereth -- ThadeusOfNazereth (talk) 21:21, 14 October 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Barbie Storymaker

On 16 October 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Barbie Storymaker, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that players of Barbie Storymaker can create their own animated movies? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Barbie Storymaker. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Barbie Storymaker), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:05, 16 October 2026 (UTC)

October 2026

Hello, I'm Sahaib. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Confectionery store have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sahaib (talk) 19:24, 21 October 2026 (UTC)

Putting maintenance notes as plaintext or boxed markup in the article lead means that it will appear when the article is printed, which we don't want. It needs to be in some kind of maintenance template, which won't show up when printed. --Belbury (talk) 19:33, 21 October 2026 (UTC)

GA authorship requirements

Hello @NewAccount7295, I noticed you nominated Confectionery store for GA, but it doesn't look like you have make significant contributions to the article (see: ). GA requirements are that a nominator needs to have 10% contributions or be in the top 5 contributors, otherwise it's considered a "drive by nomination" that a reviewer may fail right away (see: WP:GANI#N1). — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 15:45, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

@Chao Garden I acknowledged that in the edit summary, but I think WP:IAR can apply in this case since the article's expansion was basically a community project. NewAccount7295 (talk) 15:46, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

I recommend adding something about that justification to the "note=" param in the GA template on the Talk page so a reviewer considers this point. I guess it would be up to the individual reviewer. — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 15:49, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

Done. NewAccount7295 (talk) 15:52, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

Good luck! Also by the way, alt text is a new WP:Good article criteria (added to 6b). — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 15:56, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

Template:Notice on various noticeboards

Hi NewAccount7295. I have reverted most of your additions of the notice template to various noticeboards. I largely fail to see how they are relevant to places like AN or the AFD log. I would suggest instead posting neutral notices on pages like the village pump (perhaps the idea lab), or other relevant noticeboards. I would also recommend using {{Please see}} and creating a new section, rather than placing a notice on the top of these pages. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 22:14, 11 November 2026 (UTC)

Similar to this, they shouldn't go on Wikiproject pages either. Maybe their talk pages, but not the page itself. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 22:23, 11 November 2026 (UTC)

An AFI barnstar for you!

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		Thanks for your help in getting Articles for improvement onto the Main Page! Now, let's go fix em' and guide our newbiews to become long-term Wikipedia editors! I would love to write a longer/personal message, but there are more important things on-wiki than writing barnstar messages. :) Hason-LEK-SIN ● 💬 ● 🧱 ● 🧪 04:58, 12 November 2026 (UTC) Hey mate Hey mate, this image would be good to use in the DYK nomination. I added a Good Article nomination since i done a bit of work on the article, and i like your articles that you made @NewAccount7295: (P.S, for some reason this message became merged with the previous message). 1Ink (talk) 06:31, 13 November 2026 (UTC) Your nomination of Monkey Palace is under review Your good article nomination of the article Monkey Palace is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheBrickGraphic -- TheBrickGraphic (talk) 01:44, 14 November 2026 (UTC)