Latest comment: 2 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion
or perhaps I should say "visual artists", now that words such as "musician" seem to be outmoded. CVs are promotional (within tight constraints). The article Rachel Lee Hovnanian is somewhat CV-ish. Hardly surprising, then, if it's promotional. But it doesn't strike me as promotional. (Imbalanced, yes.)
[A] few examples of articles I've written about living artists: Cannupa Hanska Luger, Eric-Paul Riege, Cornelia Hesse-Honegger, Einar and Jamex de la Torre An interesting bunch. None more so than Hesse-Honegger. I've tinkered with this one: I hope I haven't thereby damaged it; but if I have, feel free to revert. Eric Isenburger isn't a living artist, but this is the artist bio on which I've most recently done quite a bit of work: feel free to improve it. (I can think of two possible augmentations that wouldn't be CV-like and would I think be worthwhile. Aside from those, I don't think I could make non-trivial improvements, or anyway not unless I have the chance to buy an affordablecheap copy of ISBN978-3-922803-31-7 -- I've already shelled out my own money for ISBN978-3-7319-0626-1; WP-editing can be an expensive hobby.) -- Hoary (talk)WWU👍︎07:10, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for tinkering, @Hoary, I appreciate it very much! I was pretty thrilled when I found out about Hesse-Honegger's wonderful work. I will have a look at the Eric Isenburger article. Agreed that WP editing can be an expensive hobby, but a worthwhile one. I grew up across the street from a library, and am a book lover. Any excuse to buy an interesting book is a good excuse for me, especially if is a used copy. Netherzone (talk) 20:51, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I took a Quick Look at Eric Isenburger, it seems very well developed and will require some time to read thru it. Not tonight though, just got back from dinner with a friend and I'm now in relaxation mode. Netherzone (talk) 01:59, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
It's only patchily developed. In some areas it may be overdeveloped; in others, though the lists in the hefty Von Frankfurt nach New York continue into the 1990s, its essayists show little interest in what happened after the mid-40s or so (and I don't blame them). Reading through the article would indeed take some time -- time you can no doubt spend more enjoyably and productively in other ways. -- Hoary (talk)WWU👍︎22:43, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello Netherzone,
Thank you for reviewing Draft:Giorgos Pol. Ioannidis. I would be grateful for some clarification so that I can address the sourcing issue correctly before resubmitting.
I would particularly like to clarify the nature of some of the principal sources, since they are Greek-language publications and their standing may not be immediately apparent from the citations alone.
One of the main sources is the Lexicon of Greek Artists: Painters – Sculptors – Engravers, 16th–20th Century (Melissa Publishing House, Athens, 1997), a four-volume reference work devoted to Greek artists. Ioannidis has a standalone entry in Volume 2 (p. 49), containing both biographical information and critical discussion of his artistic work. The entry is signed by its contributor and is independent of the artist.
The draft also draws on coverage in established Greek newspapers and periodicals with longstanding publication histories and editorial oversight, in addition to other published secondary sources discussing the artist and his work.
There are also official institutional collection records documenting works by Ioannidis in the collections of MOMus and the Municipal Art Gallery of Thessaloniki, which are cited in the draft. I understand that collection records do not by themselves constitute significant secondary coverage for WP:GNG, but I mention them because they provide independent institutional verification of this aspect of the artist's career.
Could you please clarify whether you consider the cited secondary sources insufficient in terms of reliability or independence, or whether your concern is specifically that they do not provide enough significant coverage to establish notability under WP:GNG?
If possible, it would be particularly helpful to know which sources, or which aspect of their coverage, you consider insufficient. I would prefer to address the underlying issue correctly rather than simply add more references.
Please read all the comments on the draft talk page, and the long list of reviewer comments for clarification. Please do not remove AfC templates nor reviewer comments. And please clarify the exact nature of your COI (conflict of interest) with the subject of the draft. Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 18:14, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
The Members' Meeting is similar to other WikiWednesday meetups, except that its primary function is to elect new members to the Board of Directors. We will elect three board seats – half of the elected seats on the board – and the elected board can appoint up to five more board members.
As part of the Members Meeting, we will also focus on the Wikimedia NYC Programs Plan for the coming year, the Financial Report, and how to participate in our chapter member committees for Tech and Engagement.
Election info:
To run for election or to vote, you must be a dues-paying member of Wikimedia New York City, having renewed in the past 12 months.
Voting will be both online, via emailed ballots from the ElectionBuddy service, and in-person.
The poll will be open for the 48 hours between 8pm EDT on September 28 and 8pm EDT on September 30.
For additional information, please consult the Election FAQ.
Latest comment: 18 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The administrator elections process has officially started! Qualified editors are encouraged to find at least one experienced nominator. Self-nominations are also allowed. Please review instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2026/Candidates.
Here is the schedule:
September 29–October 5: Nominations phase (we are here)
October 8–12: Discussion phase
October 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
Please note the following:
The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed. However, in practice, few candidates succeed without ~10K edits, some content creation, no recent behavioral issues, and a nominator.
The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.
If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
Who are/were the leaders of national organizations in your field? How about national award winners? That's a great place to start looking for article subjects you'd be well-suited to work on.
You will not be notified in the future about new articles linked to any of the articles you have created, if you wish to opt in to receiving these notifications, please follow the opt-in instructions.
On 13 Oct, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
This event marks the 14th Birthday of Wikidata with a celebration and mini-conference. Sign up for a lightning talk or presentation and view the most up to date schedule on the Wikipedia event registration page!
Latest comment: 5 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page History of painting, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use placeholder names, or the name of the newspaper or organisation, instead of the source's actual author or editor name. If no human author is given, the fields should be removed. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
October 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase (we are here)
Scrutineering phase
In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.