User talk:Misha Vargas

This is the place to leave complaints and comments for — or about — Misha Vargas. You could even leave something friendly. Absolutely everything and everyone is welcome and wanted. Make sure to watch this page, as this is where I'll respond.

Cache hint

Per your comment on the Elements project talkpage, here is how you could flush the cache when viewing a particular page. E.g., for Iridium, you would link to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Iridium&action=purge

Just change the title= tag in the link to whatever you want. I would think there are other ways, but this is what I do. Hope this helps. Baccyak4H (Yak!) 15:19, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Baccyak4H, I went to the pertinent Wikipedia page about making null edits, and that worked pretty well for me, as far as my seeing the page was concerned. Misha Vargas (talk) 23:07, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi there

Saw your comment on the Bothell article. I don't know what the motto actually is, but I lived in Bothell for 7 years, and just wanted to say hi. We miss you Bothell folks out here in Maine... --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:10, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Yep, keepin' it real in the 'burbs. Stay chilly.

Misha Vargas (talk) 18:35, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

FYI

Just a quick FYI. I nominated List of ministers of the ULC as a featured list candidate. Please join the discussion! Me-123567-Me (talk) 15:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2025

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Flags of Africa—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Cassiopeia talk 01:37, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Note: I immediately undid the large reversion of six of my edits, and continued the well-referenced editing unabated, with no further opposition. — Misha Vargas (talk) 03:26, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Do not publicly call me out like that.

You publicly called me out for an edit, adding a link to my page to direct people to be able to send me messages and hate. Eg224 (talk) 06:36, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Do not EVER do anything like that again. That is very risky behavior that gets people in major controversy. Eg224 (talk) 06:37, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Adding a link to you and your talk page is the automatic default that is performed every time someone uses the "undo" button. It doesn't seem like a controversial thing. I wasn't calling you out, I was just reverting edits which are not appropriate for an encyclopedic article about, in this case, the Green Bay Packers. I don't think anyone is going to be upset that you wrote "They are never winning a Super Bowl again.", or "only two super bowl wins", but it's opinion-based writing. — Misha Vargas (talk | contribs) 06:55, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Ah I don’t know that it automatically does that. My bad. Eg224 (talk) 17:45, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

June 2026

Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you recently made an edit in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:12, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

Apologies

I now understand from reading your "living person" link that without actual confirmation, it is speculation to assume from instagram comments/likes & therefore is not suitable for wikipedia. Sorry for taking your time and I will ensure to ensure any future edits are not based on speculation without being 100% verified.

Please accept my apologies. ~2026-37216-91 (talk) 11:38, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

🙂👍 ～ Misha Vargas (talk | contribs) 20:04, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Why did you revert my change to the American flags page?

The United States now calls it's military arm the 'Department of War', seems like reverting that is unnecessary? ~2026-39598-37 (talk) 05:45, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

It's best to use one name across all of Wikipedia. You can see that this has been talked about for 10 months at Talk:United States Department of Defense (there are archives to go back through on that page). You can read their arguments, but the short version is that it is still legally the Department of Defense. If they couldn't agree to change that article, other articles should keep consistent with that. ～ Misha Vargas (talk | contribs) 06:07, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Why did you revert my changes to Ceuta?

I get the fact that the citations were janky but it has actual proof of it happening, and if i had poor grammar that is due to the fact that English is not my native language, you can go improve them if you want but still HelloImYourNeighbor (talk) 14:25, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Beyond the lack of citations, the phrase "Ceuta has started to heat up dramatically" is problematic, because there is no objective measure of "dramaticness". Even examples of particularly hot days wouldn't support the statement. One could imagine a scenario where Ceuta was colder on average, but with a few weirdly hot days. If there were articles from climate scientists about the statistically significant number of hot days in Ceuta specifically, you could include something about that. ～ Misha Vargas (talk | contribs) 18:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! HelloImYourNeighbor (talk) 18:55, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sandalwood, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santalol was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:59, 10 September 2026 (UTC)