User talk:Knightmare 3112

elcome to Wikipedia Knightmare 3112, from WikiProject Editor Retention
Thank you for registering! We hope that you find collaborative editing enjoyable. Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia that started in 2001, is free for all to use and edit within the guidelines and principles users have established and adhere to. Many of these principles and guidelines are listed below. Click on the link next to the images for more information. REMEMBER - each policy and guideline page has a discussion you can join to ask questions, add input and contribute your voice towards any current policy or guideline change underway! Join the discussion by going to the talk page of the article. Please take a minute to view a number of quick start pages for an overview of how to work within these guidelines and more information to help you better understand the practices and procedures editors are using. These include: The Newcomers Manual and User:Persian Poet Gal/"How-To" Guide to Wikipedia. Sometimes new editors become frustrated quickly and find their experience on Wikipedia less than enjoyable. This need not be. If you are having a difficult time for any reason, please feel free to ask me for assistance! Or, better yet, visit The Teahouse where veteran editors are waiting to assist you.
	Policies, guidelines and peer assistance		Help and Tutorials
	The five pillars of Wikipedia. The fundamental principles of the project.		Tutorial. Step-by-step guide on how to edit.
	Main policies of Wikipedia. Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines.		How to start a page. If you want to create a new article
	Style Guide. The complete guide to how articles should look.		Help. The complete help guide
	Copyright. Addressing copyright concerns.		Quick reference. A handy quick reference guide for editing Wiki.
	Help Desk. Here you can ask other editors for assistance		Your user pages and your sandbox. Editing in your own "personal" space
	Adoption program. Request an experienced guide for your first steps of editing.		Frequently asked questions. Some common questions and their answers.

This is being posted on your talk page where you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss issues and respond to questions. At the end of each message you will see a signature left by the editor posting. This is done by signing with four tildes (~~~~) or by pressing or in the editing interface toolbox, located just above the editing window (when editing). You won't need to sign your contributions to articles themselves; you only need to when using talk pages. If you have any questions or face any initial hurdles, feel free to contact me on my talk page and I will do what I can to assist or give you guidance.

Again, welcome! ―Buster7 ☎ 15:51, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
8		William Balmain (talk)	Add sources
10		1955 in Australia (talk)	Add sources
3		John Patrick McGlinn (talk)	Add sources
10		1971 in Australia (talk)	Add sources
37		History of New South Wales (talk)	Add sources
12		1981 in Australia (talk)	Add sources
35		Blackface and Morris dancing (talk)	Cleanup
364		Silver Age of Comic Books (talk)	Cleanup
41		Yazeed Al-Rajhi (talk)	Cleanup
542		Weather of 2026 (talk)	Expand
236		Tornado outbreak and derecho of June 9–11, 2026 (talk)	Expand
37		Weather of 2024 (talk)	Expand
70		Turramurra (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2		AES Railcar (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
3		2011–12 South Alabama Jaguars basketball team (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
492		Johnson solid (talk)	Merge
86		Kalamazoo County, Michigan (talk)	Merge
12		Borei Pri HaGafen (talk)	Merge
64		History of Australian rules football (talk)	Wikify
11		2012 Australian Open – Boys' doubles (talk)	Wikify
3		Hallands Nation, Lund (talk)	Wikify
6		Christene Brownlee (talk)	Orphan
4		Bilikisu Labaran (talk)	Orphan
3		Abdulqaadir (talk)	Orphan
306		Kasey Bos (talk)	Stub
9		Muravyov-Amursky Peninsula (talk)	Stub
74		Bhartruhari Mahtab (talk)	Stub
19		Darwin Correctional Centre (talk)	Stub
4		Folklore of Norfolk Island (talk)	Stub
7		Marion Faustino Ah Tong (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:25, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Arthur Phillip

The article Arthur Phillip you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Arthur Phillip for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:41, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Arthur Phillip

On 21 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Arthur Phillip, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that before Arthur Phillip commanded the first fleet of convicts to settle Australia, he was employed to spy on France? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Arthur Phillip. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Arthur Phillip), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Joseph Luker

On 13 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Joseph Luker, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that constable Joseph Luker, the first police officer killed on duty in Australia, was a former convict? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph Luker. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Joseph Luker), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for William George Carlile Kent

On 26 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William George Carlile Kent, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that William George Carlile Kent (pictured) was court-martialled for disobeying deposed Governor William Bligh's order to destroy Sydney? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William George Carlile Kent. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, William George Carlile Kent), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde 00:02, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 21,153 views (881.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 02:28, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Henry Baylis

On 6 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Henry Baylis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Henry Baylis kept the bullet that wounded him as a good-luck charm? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Henry Baylis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Henry Baylis), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 5,048 views (420.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 05:34, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Henry Baylis

The article Henry Baylis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Henry Baylis for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 00:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

looks interesting

but I think you will find that trove has him as raecivich... https://trove.nla.gov.au/search?keyword=boulder%20bombing - best of luck! JarrahTree 10:33, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

JarrahTree They kinda have it spelled both ways https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/271637252 Knightmare 3112 (talk) 10:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

what a pain - there's always the possibility that both spellings balance out in numbers - as if 1942 was difficult enough in Perth at the time - I would lean towards the coroners report version at "BOULDER BOMBING". Kalgoorlie Miner. Vol. 48, , no. 12, 396. Western Australia. 24 March 1942. p. 2. Retrieved 6 April 2024 – via National Library of Australia.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) - but then, who knows? JarrahTree 11:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Boulder bombings

Hello, Knightmare 3112. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Boulder bombings, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Arthur Phillip

Arthur Phillip has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:10, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Boulder bombings

Hello, Knightmare 3112. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Boulder bombings".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:51, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1942 Boulder bombings (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Monkeysmashingkeyboards was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

While notability is established, article is lacking in inline citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1942 Boulder bombings and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 21:22, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Knightmare 3112! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 21:22, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1942 Boulder bombings (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ethmostigmus was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This topic is notable, however, I suspect that this draft was entirely generated by a LLM or with substantial assistance from one. Some sentences are just the kind of unencyclopedic fluff typical of LLMs: "leaving the town of Boulder in shock", "The combination of demanding labour, limited resources, and the harsh environment made daily life challenging.", "Despite the scale of the tragedy, the bombings quickly receded from public attention", etc. This draft needs to be substantially reworked to have a neutral, encyclopedic tone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1942 Boulder bombings and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 09:02, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:1942 Boulder bombings

Hello, Knightmare 3112. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1942 Boulder bombings, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 6 May 2026 (UTC)