User talk:Jp1008
Add topicWelcome!
[edit]Hi Jp1008! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 21:26, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hello Jp1008! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
What to do with "Unnassessed article" classification
[edit]| This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Added enough content to remove stub page classification to: Equestrian_Portrait_of_Prince_Balthasar_Charles. But it shows in "unassessed article" category. I´ve tried for a while to learn how to remove that, without success. is that an automatic categorization that I cannot change or is it my responsibility as editor to remove it? Jp1008 (talk) 18:37, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
- Instead of directly deleting the WikiProject banner shell (I'm surprised the edit filter let you), you should change class to start, like this:
--pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 19:00, 1 December 2025 (UTC)− WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub+ WikiProject banner shell |class=Start - I've done this for you --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 19:00, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hello Jp1008! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hello Jp1008! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hello Jp1008! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hello Jp1008! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Disambiguation link notification for December 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Portrait of Leo X, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illuminated. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2–3 days of inactivity. Message added by Theknoledgeableperson (SHOUT HERE) 19:21, 1 January 2026 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hello Jp1008! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still [[Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive_1277#Can't find EAN field in
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hello Jp1008! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hello Jp1008! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Ping
[edit]Hello, this is just a ping to let you know I've started a thread on the Florence Cathedral talk page regarding your recent edits. Becsh (talk) 20:08, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hello Jp1008! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Your contributed article, Constable Battle of Trafalgar
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Constable Battle of Trafalgar. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – The Leaping Horse. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The Leaping Horse. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hello Jp1008! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hello Jp1008! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hello Jp1008! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Disambiguation link notification for June 6
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mimesis, links pointing to the disambiguation pages White Horse and William Gilpin were added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hello Jp1008! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Category:Wikipedians interested in John Constable has been nominated for discussion
[edit]Category:Wikipedians interested in John Constable has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * in solidarity 17:48, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
- I created it thinking it was acceptable practice but it isn't. Go ahead with deletion Jp1008 (talk) 18:15, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Snow Storm: Hannibal and his Army Crossing the Alps has failed
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Snow Storm: Hannibal and his Army Crossing the Alps has
failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Phlsph7 -- Phlsph7 (talk) 13:07, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Jp1008 Just to add a note to say that you should not feel discouraged by the GA fail. You put a tremendous amount of work into the article and it's a matter of being more discerning and sourcing the claims correctly. There is a substantial amount of scholarship on Turner and on this painting, which does not make the task any easier. If you'd like any help, please let me know. Per Exemplum 16:26, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, I did address all the suggestions and (I think) resubmitted, but not sure if I did it correctly. Thanks for the encouragement. After months of work on Turner and weeks in this single painting to substantially improve it, it is helpful to receive it. Jp1008 (talk) 12:21, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
Good article nominations RfC
[edit]Hi Jp1008,
There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.
By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.
Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox(talk|contributions) 16:02, 11 August 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Dutch Boats in a Gale has failed
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Dutch Boats in a Gale has
failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 04:43, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Snow Storm: Hannibal and his Army Crossing the Alps is under review
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Snow Storm: Hannibal and his Army Crossing the Alps is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pencilceaser123 -- Pencilceaser123 (talk) 04:27, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Snow Storm: Hannibal and his Army Crossing the Alps has failed
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Snow Storm: Hannibal and his Army Crossing the Alps has
failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pencilceaser123 -- Pencilceaser123 (talk) 04:47, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hello Jp1008! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
CS1 error on J. M. W. Turner
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page J. M. W. Turner, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add a title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
- The Athenaeum. 14 May 1842. p. 433.
{{cite news}}: Missing or empty|title=(help)
- The Athenaeum. 14 May 1842. p. 433.
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:21, 10 September 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of J. M. W. Turner is under review
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article J. M. W. Turner is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 11:07, 21 September 2026 (UTC)