User talk:Jonathanischoice
Add topic
Euphonium
[edit]Hi, I was listening to a delightful Euphonium piece on RNZ this evening, and thought I would look up the history of the instrument. The piece was Sparke's Pantomine , although the performance was New Zealand SO/Bruce Hangen, Anyway, I looked at the article Euphonium. It is in need of some care and attention. I know you have many other interests, but perhaps you could find some time to give this article a boost ? Marshelec (talk) 05:24, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Marshelec I'd love to :) I'm in the middle of a keyed trumpet and bugle stint at the moment, but I'll get to it soon — Jon (talk) 05:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi - feel free to take a look. I'm considering merging most of what's in the §Name section into the §History section. I haven't touched the §Types section yet. Let me know if you have any ideas! — Jon (talk) 23:39, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Marshelec: I've been chipping away at Euphonium over the last couple of months, and I think it's in much better shape now. I'll probably nominate it for WP:GA soon, what do you think? — Jon (talk) 00:24, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors September Newsletter
[edit]show | |
|---|---|
|
Message sent by Baffle gab1978 (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Jonathanischoice. Thank you for your work on Hot fountain pen. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 21:10, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- @North8000: - thanks very much! — Jon (talk) 23:47, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors December 2024 Newsletter
[edit]show | |
|---|---|
|
Message sent by Baffle_gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:49, 7 December 2024 (UTC).
Example of music snippets in Wiksource
[edit]Hi Jon, based on your question about using Lilypond in enWikisource, this is a book I did a little while back: Fugue. So, I'm sure we can manage a manual on the Serpent. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 01:02, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wow, that's excellent! I guess this would need to go in frWikisource... — Jon (talk) 20:38, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Beeswaxcandle: for an extra challenge, I'm doing my first Wikisource in French, here. Luckily, there is very little text, and a bunch of Lilypond which will hopefully work the same in any language. Also, how is it 2024 and we don't have a cursive script font yet after seven years? — Jon (talk) 04:40, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you're never one to back down from a little challenge like that. In respect of the font, the goal is to reproduce the content rather than the little details of the look. As a result, I'm happy to not have a cursive script font. I really don't need to add that battle to those I already have to deal with. Have fun, Beeswaxcandle (talk) 08:41, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Beeswaxcandle: I know you're busy and it's Christmas season, but would you be able to have a quick squizz at this over on fr.wikisource, I know it's in French but so far it seems similar enough and I've been able to muddle along. The first thing is that I think I've somehow ended up with .djvu in the title of the book, and page name, by mistake... is that a simple move page request? I've missed out 6-7 pages of price catalogue, which looks absolutely horrendous to try and reproduce! I haven't really figured out what the different red yellow and blue page colours mean. Anyway, cheers and Merry Christmas! — Jon (talk) 03:52, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Jon, the extension of .djvu is correct in the Livre: (Index:) and Page: namespaces. This is based on the filename. It won't show in Mainspace when the pages are transcluded. I would count the price catalogue as advertisements and ignore. The colours: red means "not proofread" or not ready for second eyes; yellow is "proofread" or ready for second eyes to look at; blue is "problematic" or an image is needed or need to think more about the page; there is also green, which is "validated" or second eyes have gone over the page; and gray, which is for blank pages. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 06:35, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Beeswaxcandle: I know you're busy and it's Christmas season, but would you be able to have a quick squizz at this over on fr.wikisource, I know it's in French but so far it seems similar enough and I've been able to muddle along. The first thing is that I think I've somehow ended up with .djvu in the title of the book, and page name, by mistake... is that a simple move page request? I've missed out 6-7 pages of price catalogue, which looks absolutely horrendous to try and reproduce! I haven't really figured out what the different red yellow and blue page colours mean. Anyway, cheers and Merry Christmas! — Jon (talk) 03:52, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you're never one to back down from a little challenge like that. In respect of the font, the goal is to reproduce the content rather than the little details of the look. As a result, I'm happy to not have a cursive script font. I really don't need to add that battle to those I already have to deal with. Have fun, Beeswaxcandle (talk) 08:41, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
January 2025 GAN Backlog Drive
[edit] | |
| |
| If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Ornette picture with low-A alto
[edit]The caption says it's a Selmer, but is it? I can't make out the logo, and the finish on it looks like it's a much more recent horn than an old Mark VI with a low-A. He could obviously have had one refinished I guess. - Special-T (talk) 13:38, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Special-T on Commons there's several photos e.g. File:Ornette Coleman.jpg of him playing the same horn, with the Selmer logo, and the three-way key guard on the bell (normally 2) because of the extra tone hole for the A. Jon (talk) 19:14, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! - Special-T (talk) 07:32, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Arts Foundation of New Zealand logo.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Arts Foundation of New Zealand logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:02, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors 2024 Annual Report
[edit]show | |
|---|---|
|
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:36, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit] |
Hello Jonathanischoice! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Lilypond
[edit]Hello Jon,
How do I need to modify the following text if an Eb should epeare as first smaller note in parentheses ? - Gisbert ツ (talk) Illustrate Wikipedia ! 13:35, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, I've been using \magnifyMusic, something like this:Note that you don't need to mark the low E with 8vb — Jon (talk) 01:41, 13 April 2025 (UTC)Musical scores are temporarily disabled.
- sorry I missed your words, you can use \parenthesize to give you the note in ( ) Jon (talk) 10:38, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- I have illustrated your notes with my text. I then placed the addition \parenthesize in various places, but without the desired result.- Gisbert ツ (talk) Illustrate Wikipedia ! 18:18, 17 April 2025 (UTC)Musical scores are temporarily disabled.
- It seems to be a problem with v 2.22 of Lilypond. I have been trying for years to get them to upgrade to 2.24 so we can SVG output. Please add your voice to ticket T385404 so that it happens some time, hopefully before the sun runs out hydrogen. — Jon (talk) 02:15, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors April 2025 Newsletter
[edit]show | |
|---|---|
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:54, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
To improve a translation (done)
[edit]Hello Jon, I ask you to look here and improve my English. Thankyou! - Gisbert ツ (talk) Illustrate Wikipedia ! 05:59, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, page stalker here. Is the intention for this to be a new standalone article? The reason I'm asking is that it would seem more appropriate to me to make this content part of the article clarinet. Schwede66 08:52, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Of course, the text will be no. 4.4 in the article Clarinet (as in the German no. 1.2). Please check it. - Gisbert ツ (talk) Illustrate Wikipedia ! 05:52, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not qualified to check it, I'm afraid. Schwede66 06:31, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Of course, the text will be no. 4.4 in the article Clarinet (as in the German no. 1.2). Please check it. - Gisbert ツ (talk) Illustrate Wikipedia ! 05:52, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit] |
Hello Jonathanischoice! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Precious anniversary
[edit] | |
| Two years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:19, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Somehow in the commotion of May, I missed this. Thank you too, for your great work on Wikipedia! Jon (talk) 22:53, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Getzen logo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Getzen logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:46, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Hiatus
[edit]Dear wiki friends, if anyone is wondering why I've been a bit quiet it's because 9 days ago I was rushed to the local ED with a subarachnoid hæmorrhage (SAH). But unlike all the poor folks who have had to deal with the complications and poor outcomes from aneurysms described in that article, mine was a perimesencephalic SAH, which originates in a vein which quickly self-heal in most cases and can now be reliably identified if the CT is done within 6 hours. This was the most terrifying thing in my life, I am unbelievably lucky and so thankful. I'm getting better every day, and can now function normally for short bursts. But that article terrified everyone I knew who read it, and there is no mention of perimesencephalic hæmorrhage anywhere. They make up about 10% of cases, have different risk factors, present otherwise identically, are conclusively identified by CT and MRI angiogram, but they have generally much better prognosis, and treatment is as for other SAH assuming successful treatment of the aneurysm.[1] When I'm a bit better, I'd like to fix it. Anyway, cheers. Let's all make this encyclopædia awesome. — Jon (talk) 01:02, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Crikey. I've only just seen this, Jon. Look after yourself. I hope you have a speedy and full recovery. Schwede66 08:22, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- All the best from me too, Jon Quilt Phase (talk) 04:09, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you both, I'm feeling much better. I hope to see you at the next Wellington or online meetup. By the way, I got ophicleide reviewed to GA, and I'm having a go at a DYK nomination for it. — Jon (talk) 03:55, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
References
- ↑ Farkas, Josh (2022). "Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH)". The Internet Book of Clinical Care. University of Vermont. Retrieved 3 June 2025.
May 2025 GOCE drive awards
[edit] |
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to Jonathanischoice for copy edits totaling over 8,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE May 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 04:58, 4 June 2025 (UTC) |
 |
Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Articles, 1st Place | |
| This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Jonathanischoice for copyediting 44 articles during the GOCE May 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 04:58, 4 June 2025 (UTC) |
Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:19, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ophicleide
[edit]The article Ophicleide you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ophicleide and Talk:Ophicleide/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 11:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ophicleide
[edit]The article Ophicleide you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Ophicleide for comments about the article, and Talk:Ophicleide/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 09:26, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Gebr. Alexander logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Gebr. Alexander logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 11:02, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors' June 2025 Newsletter
[edit]show | |
|---|---|
|
DYK nomination of Ophicleide
[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Ophicleide at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! NeoGaze (talk) 23:55, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Ophicleide
[edit]
On 24 July 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ophicleide, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the ophicleide (example pictured) was used in early British brass bands in the 19th century before being replaced by the euphonium? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ophicleide. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ophicleide), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:02, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
 | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
Thank you for the really good article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:58, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Euphonium is next... Jon (talk) 03:26, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, good plan! - Béatrice Uria-Monzon and her story, Julia Hagen and her no story --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:56, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
- On Bach's day of death, I decorated my user pages in memory of his music, and my story ends on "peace". --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:56, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit] |
The Classical Barnstar | |
| For your substantial, well-researched improvements to ophicleide. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 03:10, 24 July 2025 (UTC) |
Happy First Edit Day!
[edit] |
Hey, Jonathanischoice. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 00:59, 30 July 2025 (UTC) |
 |
The Queen's Closet
[edit]Kia ora, I hope your recovery is going OK. :) This is just to let you know that I have published a new article: The Queen's Closet (ensemble), including a photo that I took at their performance at Fortune Favours yesterday. Feedback welcome :) _Marshelec (talk) 03:05, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Your good article nomination of the article Soprillo is 
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Marshelec -- Marshelec (talk) 08:26, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
September 2025
[edit]
Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Euphonium. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:28, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors – September 2025 Newsletter
[edit]show | |
|---|---|
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:46, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
Your good article nomination of the article Soprillo has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Marshelec -- Marshelec (talk) 20:44, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
October 2025 GAN Backlog Drive
[edit] | |
| |
| If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:57, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
September 2025 GOCE drive award
[edit] |
The Minor Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to Jonathanischoice for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! GoldRomean (talk) 19:20, 4 October 2025 (UTC) |
Your good article nomination of the article Euphonium has 
failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 21:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Euphonium, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:18, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
October 2025 GAN Backlog Drive
[edit] |
The Minor Barnstar | |
| This award is given to Jonathanischoice for accumulating at least 3 points in the October 2025 GAN Backlog Drive. Your dedicated reviews contributed to the successful reduction of the backlog and helped improve the quality of articles. Here's our token of appreciation. Thank you for your time and efforts, and hopefully we'll see you soon again! Fade258 (talk) 15:37, 4 November 2025 (UTC) |
Your good article nomination of the article Euphonium is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 21:22, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Your good article nomination of the article Euphonium has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 05:23, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Soprillo
[edit]On 2 December 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Soprillo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the soprillo saxophone (example pictured) is about half the length of a soprano saxophone and pitched one octave higher? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Soprillo. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Soprillo), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.
Guild of Copy Editors – December 2025 Newsletter
[edit]show | |
|---|---|
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Happy Christmas!
[edit].jpg)
.jpg)
Hello Jonathanischoice: Enjoy the holiday season, have a happy New Year, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, ―Panamitsu (talk) 21:23, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
pōhutukawa
Totaranui
.jpg)
.jpg)
Prospective GA review, with caveat
[edit]Hello, I was excited to see your GA nomination for Tenor horn - as a longtime horn player, I hope I can do a good review for you. I haven't started it, however, because I'm coming down with a wicked cold. Do you mind if I start the review and sit on it for a few days as I get better, or would you like to let it ride? Best, chickenpox4dinner (talk) 18:14, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Chickenpox4dinner Hi, thanks for picking it up. I'm happy either way, up to you. — Jonathanischoice (talk) 18:53, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
DYK for Euphonium
[edit]On 7 January 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Euphonium, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one of the few jazz proponents of the euphonium was 20th-century musician Rich Matteson? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Euphonium. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Euphonium), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.
Aotearoa New Zealand Online Meetup Timing
[edit]Recently, attendees at the Aotearoa New Zealand Online Meetup discussed potentially changing the time and date of future meetings. As such, we are surveying the community to find a meeting time which suits the majority. Please complete the quick, anonymous survey to let us know your preferred timing for the online meetups. Apologies if you have already received this message. Ngā mihi! Hillmenco 22:55, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Tenor horn is under review
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Tenor horn is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chickenpox4dinner -- Chickenpox4dinner (talk) 00:04, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
February 2026 GAN Backlog Drive
[edit]| Good article nominations | February 2026 Backlog Drive |  |
February 2026 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted a good article review in the past year or participated in the previous backlog drive. | |
-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:00, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Tenor horn has passed
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Tenor horn has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chickenpox4dinner -- Chickenpox4dinner (talk) 23:06, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Congratulations on your work on Tenor horn and its new GA status. I had some – quite painful – involvement with the article in the past and am pleased and relieved to see it doing so well under your influence. Well done! Cheers DBaK (talk) 12:41, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- @DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered thank you both. It's been fun to get these brass instrument articles into a good state. I started out on the fringes, and I'm working my way in to the main articles. This year I'd like to get tuba done next, and ultimately (french) horn, trombone, and possibly trumpet (in order of amount of work required!) — Jonathanischoice (talk) 04:04, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors/Membership/News/2025 Annual Report
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors Annual Report
 Our 2025 Annual Report is now ready for review.
Highlights:
– Your Guild coordinators
To stop receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors – April 2026 Newsletter
[edit]show | |
|---|---|
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:28, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Your good article nomination of the article Tuba is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Aza24 -- Aza24 (talk) 00:45, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
- By the way, nice idea adding the Bell image to the list of tubists, but see the revision history (I tried the same thing but was reverted). Aza24 (talk) 16:30, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive
[edit]| Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive | |
| June 2026 Backlog Drive:
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?
Interested in taking part? You can sign up here. | |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive. | |
Your good article nomination of the article Tuba has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Aza24 -- Aza24 (talk) 23:06, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors – June 2026 Newsletter
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors June 2026 Newsletter
 Hello and welcome to the June 2026 newsletter, a quarterly-ish digest of Guild activities since April. Election news: Nominations for the mid-year coordinator election ends at 23:59 on 15 June. Voting will last from 00:00 on 16 June to 23:59 on 30 June. Results will be announced on the election page. April Blitz: 18 of the 21 editors who signed up for the April 2026 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited 122,993 words in 56 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. May Drive: 34 of the 66 editors who signed up for the May 2026 Backlog Elimination Drive copy edited 543,972 words in 211 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. June Blitz: Our June 2026 Copy Editing Blitz will start on 14 June and finish on 30 June. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 22:40, 11 June 2025 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 132 requests since 1 January, and the backlog stands at 1,691 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Pedal tone
[edit]Hi Jonathan, thanks for your thanks regarding my alphorn photo. Thanks also for your excellent photos, quite amazing!
I don't quite understand paragraphs 2 and 3 on Pedal tone even though I used to play the trombone. If you do, could you improve them? Theosch (talk) 08:18, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Theosch Cheers! I'll certainly have a go, once I've got the tuba review out of the way. Jonathanischoice (talk) 12:32, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive notice
[edit]Hi there! Thanks for signing up for the June 2026 GAN backlog drive! We have noticed that you have made little to no reviews during the drive. We, the coordinators, would appreciate if you'd pick up at least one GAN to review until the end of the month! Thank you. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 12:18, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
- I am reviewing Talk:Meine Seufzer, meine Tränen, BWV 13/GA1 at the moment as part of the drive, but I'm also having my own Talk:Tuba/GA1 nomination reviewed at the same time since late May, which has held up my participation somewhat. — Jonathanischoice (talk) 12:24, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
June music
[edit] | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
Thank you for the Bach cantata review! - Today is the centenary of King Roger, an opera by Karol Szymanowski who is pictured on the main page, - my story with the trailer of the performance I saw. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:29, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
- Król Roger is my favourite opera I've never seen; the opening five minutes are absolutely astonishing. The chances of anyone putting it on in New Zealand are probably quite remote, but I live in hope. — Jonathanischoice (talk) 05:41, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for sharing! - Congrats for tuba, and your plans for the next! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:11, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
Your good article nomination of the article Tuba has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Aza24 -- Aza24 (talk) 04:27, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Aza24: thank you so much! On to the next instrument... — Jonathanischoice (talk) 05:38, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
SVG
[edit]Hi! I just wanted to say thank you for persevering with phab:T49578. The new SVG output looks a million times better than the fuzzy old PNGs. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 08:40, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
- You're very welcome! It's a vast improvement. I'm looking forward to it being deployed on Wikisource too, e.g. Métoyen's Méthode de serpent — Jonathanischoice (talk) 10:43, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]This is me. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:06, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
- People tell me you are in Paris. Is it true, Jon? Schwede66 19:18, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Schwede66 Oui! Fromage, baguettes, trés bon! I saw you once and tried yelling across the room but you were too far away. Baguettes at 10.30? Jonathanischoice (talk) 23:37, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
- Sure, can do. Say where exactly. Also, Heidi is organising a Kiwi (and Aussie?) group photo on the non-smoker steps next to the amphitheatre for 3:30 pm. Schwede66 07:23, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Schwede66 gaahhh sorry, might be more like 10.50, on the amphitheatre level. Fam stuff, only leaving accom now Jonathanischoice (talk) 08:22, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
- Cool. See you there. Schwede66 08:23, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Schwede66 gaahhh sorry, might be more like 10.50, on the amphitheatre level. Fam stuff, only leaving accom now Jonathanischoice (talk) 08:22, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
- Sure, can do. Say where exactly. Also, Heidi is organising a Kiwi (and Aussie?) group photo on the non-smoker steps next to the amphitheatre for 3:30 pm. Schwede66 07:23, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Schwede66 Oui! Fromage, baguettes, trés bon! I saw you once and tried yelling across the room but you were too far away. Baguettes at 10.30? Jonathanischoice (talk) 23:37, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
- Cite Q has "Add indication alongside citations of retracted/ replaced works" on its to-do list, that might be a good first step? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:18, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
- I'm going to try writing some scripts to flog updates to Module:Cite Q into git so I can keep things straight... not using source control in 2026 is doing my head in, haha! — Jonathanischoice (talk) 01:45, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for the GA review of Abdul El-Sayed!
[edit]My first GA elevated nomination! Very much appreciate your review and feedback, and for taking over for the other reviewer who was unable to complete the review. I was wondering if WP:Good articles/Social sciences and society would be a more appropriate category than WP:Good articles/Natural sciences though, considering the subject is an epidemiologist and a politician, both of which seem to fall into the social sciences and society tag. Wasn't sure if I could change that myself or not as I'm still learning about the GA process. Edittttor (talk) 22:33, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Edittttor I put it under "Medical institutions and people" since he's a doc and public health official and hasn't actually been elected yet. This seems to be under "Natural sciences" which is... odd? Jonathanischoice (talk) 23:42, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
[edit] |
Hi, Jonathanischoice, I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day! Have a great day! ―Panamitsu (talk) 21:31, 29 July 2026 (UTC) |
|
Happy First Edit Day!
[edit] | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Jonathanischoice! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:38, 30 July 2026 (UTC) |  |
Happy First Edit Day!
[edit] |
Happy First Edit Day, Jonathanischoice, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! ☘︎☘︎☘︎ALEXHammeke (talk | guestbook | sandbox) 19:35, 30 July 2026 (UTC) |
Good article nominations RfC
[edit]Hi Jonathanischoice,
There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.
By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.
Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox(talk|contributions) 16:02, 11 August 2026 (UTC)
- @JacobTheRox I'm in hospital at the moment on my phone, so I can't add a comment to the general discussion at the end for some reason, but just to say I appreciate your efforts in compiling the RfC. I am fine with the unusually large list of 35+ Qs in one place, it's less fragmented and I can read through them all, and I support and understand your reasons for doing so. When I have a laptop I will add a comment to that effect. I have recently copped a bit of push back on my GA assist-review of Abdul El-Sayed, where it seems I overlooked and rushed some things in the name of expediency and while distracted at Wikimania Paris, so this review is good timing for me to take stock. Jonathanischoice (talk) 06:04, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
- I hope you are okay and I wish you all the best with your health
. While there is no time pressure, because the RfC will be running for at least a month while people discuss different proposals, if you prefer, you could also compile a list of !votes or comments on a different page (e.g. a user sandbox) which will be easier to navigate and edit and I can transfer them over for you :) (in solidarity), JacobTheRox(talk|contributions) 08:07, 12 August 2026 (UTC) - I hope your health improves swiftly and fully! Schwede66 18:30, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
- I hope you are okay and I wish you all the best with your health
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
Your nomination of Flugelhorn is under review
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Flugelhorn is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 01:43, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Flugelhorn has passed
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Flugelhorn has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 08:23, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- User:Generalissima has placed a Citation Needed tag on a statement in this article, which does in fact need a citation. I'm embarrassed at having missed it. The statement is under Construction: "The modern flugelhorn is usually pitched in 4½-foot (4½′) B♭, like most trumpets and cornets, with three piston valves. It is also sometimes built in 4′ C. Instruments made with rotary valves are used in central and eastern Europe, and feature a "shepherd crook" shape in the first tubing bend, retained from the earliest Prussian cornets and valved bugles." Please go ahead and take care of that, because I don't really want to reopen a GA that I just closed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:58, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Doneburgers. Jonathanischoice (talk) 00:39, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! Let me know when you’ve got French horn ready to go. 😃 Bgsu98 (Talk) 06:40, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Bgsu98 well if you're keen, I nominated baritone horn in April... — Jonathanischoice (talk) 06:50, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! Let me know when you’ve got French horn ready to go. 😃 Bgsu98 (Talk) 06:40, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Doneburgers. Jonathanischoice (talk) 00:39, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Baritone horn is under review
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Baritone horn is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 07:02, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Baritone horn has passed
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Baritone horn has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 04:21, 22 August 2026 (UTC)
TE right
[edit]You can request the Template editor right at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Template editor (see WP:TEGRANT for the criteria). You should also ask for "Autopatrolled", on Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled (see WP:APCRITERIA). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits; 14:21, 23 August 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Andy, I've already tried to apply for TE (here) but I'll try again. — Jonathanischoice (talk) 01:26, 24 August 2026 (UTC)
- That failed on the eligibility criteria, which you should meet sooner rather than later, Meantime, I have the TE right and am happy to look at any relevant edit requests, provided they include a diff and a link to test cases. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits; 10:15, 24 August 2026 (UTC)
- I believe you meet all the criteria now and you've certainly shown a need for the right, so I've added it to your account — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:58, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
.svg){kind=icon}
Your account has been granted the "templateeditor" user permission, allowing you to edit templates and modules that have been protected with template protection. It also allows you to bypass the title blacklist, giving you the ability to create and edit editnotices. Before you use this user right, please read Wikipedia:Template editor and make sure you understand its contents. In particular, you should read the section on wise template editing and the criteria for revocation.
You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and editnotices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, after those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their consensus among other informed editors has been established. If you are willing to process edit requests on templates and modules, keep in mind that you are taking responsibility to ensure the edits have consensus and are technically sound.
This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
If you were granted the permission on a temporary basis, you will need to reapply for the permission a few days before it expires. In your request, include a permalink to the discussion where it was granted and a {{Reply to}} for the administrator who granted you the permission. You can find the permalink in your rights log.
- Useful links
- All template-protected pages
- User:AnomieBOT/TPERTable – outstanding template-protected edit requests (bot-generated)
Happy template editing! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:58, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors – September 2026 Newsletter
[edit]| Guild of Copy Editors – September 2026 Newsletter
Hello, and welcome to the September newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Election news: Project coordinators play an important role in our WikiProject. Following the mid-year Election of Coordinators, we welcomed TNM101 to the coordinator team. Dhtwiki remains as lead coordinator, and Miniapolis, Mox Eden and GoldRomean return as coordinators. We said goodbye to Wikieditor662 and thank them for their service. If you'd like to help out behind the scenes, please consider taking part in our December election – watchlist our ombox for updates. Information about the role of coordinators can be found here. Reviewing system: The Guild is adopting a new system of scoring copy edit reviews. A point will be given for each review, and barnstars for reviewing will be awarded. These changes will take effect from this month's drive, and we encourage experienced copy editors to sign up for reviewing. For more details, see here. June 2026 blitz: 18 of the 20 editors who signed up for the June 2026 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited a total of 69,606 words comprising 30 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. July 2026 drive: 30 of the 44 editors who signed up for the July 2026 Backlog Elimination Drive copy edited a total of 531,346 words comprising 252 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. August 2026 Blitz: 13 of the 16 editors who signed up for the August 2026 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited a total of 192,712 words comprising 64 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. September 2026 Drive: Sign up here to earn barnstars in our month-long, in-progress September Backlog Elimination Drive. Progress report: As of 23:47, 13 September 2026 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 207 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 1,511 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we do without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:54, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
Citations from a database
[edit]I saw you were developing {{Cite Q}}.
There are a lot of moving pieces here but lately, like in the past few months, a lot of technology and partners have changed to make it worthwhile to explore options to copy Wikipedia citations to a Wikimedia database, and maybe pull citations from that database to help sort and standardize them.
Some ideas are at meta:WikiCite/ReCite and there is older documentation of other perspectives elsewhere.
Can you briefly tell me more about your interest in Cite Q?
I see you posting at Template talk:Cite Q but what is your overall motivation? It seems like people come to citation templates for many reasons. Bluerasberry (talk) 23:46, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
- I think it's much better to maintain a citation in once place, in this case Wikidata, and cite it on Wikimedia projects by (ideally) just using {{Cite Q}} with a QID. The simplest benefit is the metadata (author, title, publisher, etc.) is always updated or corrected once, and propagated everywhere. It doesn't require Wikipedia editors to write tediously long {{Cite journal}} or {{Cite book}} incantations and specify (correctly) every bit of metadata, and then have to copy and paste them everywhere to reuse them. Then different editors will cite the same source, in different articles, but each one slightly different or incorrect in their own different way. But there are also many second-order benefits from using Cite Q, like being able to automatically flag citations that have been retracted, have errata, or expression of concern notices, without the article editor having to do any extra checking. My interest is in making it easy to provide citations for Wikipedia article editors (although I don't use the Visual Editor, so I have no idea how well Cite Q works with it). I have reused several book sources using Cite Q in my GAs, e.g. flugelhorn, euphonium, cimbasso, tuba, etc. It still needs work - I have been knocking off many long-standing annoyances, but the one major thing it is missing is the way authors are listed, and it needs to extract given and family names for the vast majority of cases where that is expected, and also to get it to work with Harvard-style {{sfn}} references. I'm open to ideas though! — Jonathanischoice (talk) 00:13, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
Produnto
[edit]ICYMI in Tech News; this looks interesting, for Cite Q:
Produnto has been deployed to mediawiki.org and some Indic language wikis. We want to hear your feedback on this experimental product. Produnto allows users to use Lua modules hosted in Wikimedia's GitLab. It simplifies the sharing of Lua code between wikis. Instead of copying each individual Lua module from one wiki to another, users will be able to easily share packages across all wikis.
-- Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits; 20:50, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
Participate in the October 2026 GAN drive!!
[edit]| Good article nominations | October 2026 Backlog Drive | |
October 2026 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted a good article review in the past year or participated in the previous backlog drive. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:09, 3 October 2026 (UTC)
NZ species edit-a-thon on 17 Oct
[edit]Hi Jonathan, We were happy to see your name on the list of attendees for our upcoming NZ species edit a thon on Saturday 17 Oct from 10-4 at the Wellington Central Library! If you are coming, could you please RSVP here, so we can plan for catering purposes? Thank you so much and see you soon. Stitchbird2 (talk) 00:10, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Flute
[edit]Флейта
~2026-55643-31 (talk) 17:49, 17 October 2026 (UTC)
- Спасибо Jonathanischoice (talk) 18:11, 17 October 2026 (UTC)
Authors with missing given and family names
[edit]How easy would it be to break down use of Category:Cite Q - authors with missing given and family names so that errors go into one (or both!) of:
- Category:Cite Q - author items with missing given and family names
- Category:Cite Q - author name strings with missing given and family names
please? I find the former much quicker (using d:User:1Veertje/NamePrefiller.js), and more important, to fix; others may wish to concentrate on the latter. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits; 13:49, 18 October 2026 (UTC)
- @Pigsonthewing I have some IRL right now but I'm happy to do that, along with the ignore non-human first/last name business, which is obvious in retrospect... — Jonathanischoice (talk) 19:55, 18 October 2026 (UTC)
- @Pigsonthewing, a thought: do you want separate categories for editors and translators, or lump them in with authors so that we only have author name strings separate (the others all being item properties)? — Jonathanischoice (talk) 20:34, 18 October 2026 (UTC)
- Happy for them to be lumped.
- I suspect the editor and translator number will be much lower. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits; 20:57, 18 October 2026 (UTC)