User talk:Iss246

Welcome!

Hello, Iss246, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Eldereft ~(s)talk~ 20:10, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Profile of ISS246's contributions to Wikipedia.

Here is a page that enables the reader to view the number of hits on each Wikipedia entry: Hits per Wikipedia page

Provides profile of any Wikipedian's contributions: A Quick Summary

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcia Bricker Halperin (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please ensure that the draft demonstrates that Halperin satisfies either WP:ARTIST or, more generally, WP:PERSON. As it is, this draft does suggest that the book Kibbitz & Nosh: When We All Met at Dubrow's Cafeteria is notable. Why not put Halperin aside for now, and create a draft about the book?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marcia Bricker Halperin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 00:56, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Iss246! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 00:56, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Marcia Bricker Halperin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Marcia Bricker Halperin. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 21:15, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Ok. Got it. It goes against the style manual I ordinarily use. But I will make the changes. Iss246 (talk) 23:41, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcia Bricker Halperin has been accepted

Marcia Bricker Halperin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 22:28, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Bless you.

Over the years, I didn't know about the article creation site, and just went ahead and created articles. When I learned about it, I tried it out.

I appreciate your help. I will inform ForsythiaJo, who was also encouraging.

Thank you. Iss246 (talk) 03:29, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Much appreciated!

Thank you very much for your intelligent remark last Sunday at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gestalt_psychology#Adage! -anotherKWW (talk) 03:47, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, @-anotherKWW Iss246 (talk) 23:41, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited City College of New York, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love Story was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

New cross-language page link: Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

A new page 職業・組織心理学ジャーナル on the Japanese Wikipedia has been linked to page Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, which you created, via Wikidata (Q6295673).

You will not be notified in the future about new articles linked to any of the articles you have created, if you wish to opt-in to receiving these notifications, please follow the opt-in instructions.

NervousBot (talk) 10:23, 29 September 2026 (UTC)