User talk:Goodone121

220 house gop reps isn't a razor thin margin. It's actually pretty good as only 218 are needed for control and it may even be 221 as a race has yet to be called in California. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:243:2100:33E0:C56E:E078:8EEA:185E (talk) 20:36, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

You reverted a clear typo that I had corrected in Christianity

I fixed what was clearly an incorrect phrasing or typo. What was written was "one of more of". I corrected the same to "one or more of". Is this really not constructive? After this your message asks me to "familiarise" myself "with our policies and guidelines". Really? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rotamre (talk • contribs) 04:38, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Thing is, you removed a WP:short description without any discussion on the article's Talk page. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 05:04, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

I cannot believe that WP would think of even such clear typos corrections as unconstructive. Kindly revert the revert. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rotamre (talk • contribs) 04:43, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Re: Oxford University

The source isn’t Oxford University. It’s Samuel L. Popkin. I don’t understand why you would add Oxford. Viriditas (talk) 03:35, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

My mistake. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 03:36, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, but even with the correct attribution now, the grammatical style doesn't work and actually confuses the reader and makes them think Popkin is referring to the subsequent phrase which has nothing to do with him. You also repeated the same "according to" phrase twice in the same paragraph. Viriditas (talk) 09:00, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

You may be eligible to vote in the U4C election

I am contacting you because you previously voted in elections related to the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C). You may be eligible to vote in the current U4C election, which is open now and closes on 2 June 2026. You can find out more about the candidates and the election on the election page on Meta, and from there you can access the vote itself. Your participation in these elections is important to the governance of Wikimedia communities, and your time spent learning about the candidates and voting is appreciated.

-- In cooperation with the U4C, Keegan (WMF) (talk)

Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:16, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

What decade is it again?

*sigh* SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:03, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Office of Special Counsel and effect of SCOTUS Slaughter decision

I got a message that my edits to the Office of Special Counsel page was less-than neutral regarding the effect of the recent Slaughter decision by SCOTUS. How can I provide support that the edit is neutral? Currently, the wiki does not include this recent development, and thus the existing body of the page may be misleading in that the Office of Special Counsel is no longer the essence of what it had been. ~2026-39775-46 (talk) 05:27, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Let's move this to the article's talk page, so more than just us are talking about this. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 05:30, 15 July 2026 (UTC)