Jump to content

User talk:Geno Eric

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by DreamRimmer bot II in topic Your draft article, Draft:Charles Owekmeno

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Geno Eric! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding User:Geno Eric/sandbox

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Geno Eric. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Geno Eric/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Geno Eric/sandbox

[edit]

Hello, Geno Eric. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:04, 19 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Allan Kato for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allan Kato is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allan Kato until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ibjaja055 (talk) 00:43, 24 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Geno Eric

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Geno Eric requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:55, 1 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

August 2025

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:56, 1 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hey, thanks for the message. I’ve read through the user page guidelines, but I’m honestly not sure what part of my page was against the rules. If you could point out what specifically needs to be changed, I’d appreciate it — happy to fix it. Geno Eric (talk) 20:24, 1 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:National Agricultural Research Organisation, from its old location at User:Geno Eric. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:24, 1 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because (your reason here) --Geno Eric (talk) 19:37, 1 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Another user declined my speedy deletion nomination. I have therefore moved your content to the draft article space, where it is now located at Draft:National Agricultural Research Organisation. You may continue to work on it there.
The personal information you posted on here is not appropriate for your talk page. The purpose of this page is notification and communication with other Wikipedia editors. It is not a workspace for articles in progress or for general chat/personal info. Therefore I have moved that to your userpage. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:28, 1 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Agricultural Research Organisation (August 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Every claim you make needs to be verifiable. Also see the neutral point of view policy.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:50, 2 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

AfC Warning on NARO Citations

[edit]

Hello,

The article “National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO)” which is an agency under Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries (Uganda) has been fully published and reviewed. Could an experienced editor kindly check the citations and remove the AfC warning template that appears when this page is cited?

Thank you for your help!

Geno Eric Geno Eric (talk) 10:10, 29 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Owekmeno (January 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilio was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please add Indepth sources primarily about the subject that goes beyond Quotes, event participation and organisational roles. see WP:GNG and WP:BIO
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 14:41, 5 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Etania.webp

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Etania.webp. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:30, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Forever Etania moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Forever Etania. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no indication of notability of the subject, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and it has too many errors of formatting. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:42, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

The fact that you made zero changes to the article after it was DRAFTIFIED is very concerning. There are a large number of blatantly obvious errors on that page that you clearly have no reviewed. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:19, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Forever Etania has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Forever Etania. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 11:12, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Charles Owekmeno

[edit]

Hello, Geno Eric. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Charles Owekmeno".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 04:22, 18 July 2026 (UTC)Reply