Latest comment: 1 month ago5 comments3 people in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Right now every reference is to the AFL website, so the refs don't reflect 'secondary' and 'non-independent' coverage. Include some references from the major newspapers and it should be fine after that. Aspirex (talk) 03:53, 22 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I do have Fox Sports, Afl Tables as well referenced there now, not sure on what else I can add, probably GOTY,MOTY and Jim Stynes award since they were announced on that night too Flipstatic Energy (talk) 04:16, 22 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Flipstatic Energy!
Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article.
To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk.
Latest comment: 24 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peel Thunder Football Club, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hugh Davies was added.
Latest comment: 12 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Mikeycdiamond, left the following feedback:
group notability: sources must discuss the items in the list as a whole, rather than just verifying that the individual items exist;
encyclopedic purpose: avoid cross-categorisations, such as "List of X of Y", unless sources explicitly discuss this intersection as a distinct subject;
Selection criteria: an unambiguous, objective definition of what is included to distinguish the list from a directory.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If no such sources exist, the list is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Latest comment: 9 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Jay Polkinghorne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.
Future articles
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
