User talk:Ertanemekturan
Add topicLatest comment: 19 days ago by The Bushranger in topic August 2026
August 2026
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Izno (talk) 18:06, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Ertanemekturan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
Hello Izno. Thank you for looking into my account. You are absolutely right to see a connection, and I want to be completely transparent: I am connected to the "Emekertan" and "Londonist DMC" accounts. When those were created, I did not fully understand Wikipedia's strict policies regarding single-account usage, undisclosed editing, and corporate usernames.
My goal with this "Ertanemekturan" account was to start fresh, follow the rules properly, and be a genuinely constructive editor. As my recent contribution history shows (including the +12,000 byte update to "The King's Awards for Enterprise", completing newcomer tasks, and properly using my sandbox for drafting the Alejo Alolor biography), I am putting in real effort to improve the encyclopedia correctly.
I apologize for the past multi-account confusion. I am more than happy to have the "Emekertan" and "Londonist DMC" accounts permanently locked. I only wish to abide by the rules using this single "Ertanemekturan" account moving forward to continue my positive contributions. I hope you can consider giving me a chance to prove I can be a valuable editor.Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello Izno. Thank you for looking into my account. You are absolutely right to see a connection, and I want to be completely transparent: I am connected to the "Emekertan" and "Londonist DMC" accounts. When those were created, I did not fully understand Wikipedia's strict policies regarding single-account usage, undisclosed editing, and corporate usernames. My goal with this "Ertanemekturan" account was to start fresh, follow the rules properly, and be a genuinely constructive editor. As my recent contribution history shows (including the +12,000 byte update to "The King's Awards for Enterprise", completing newcomer tasks, and properly using my sandbox for drafting the Alejo Alolor biography), I am putting in real effort to improve the encyclopedia correctly. I apologize for the past multi-account confusion. I am more than happy to have the "Emekertan" and "Londonist DMC" accounts permanently locked. I only wish to abide by the rules using this single "Ertanemekturan" account moving forward to continue my positive contributions. I hope you can consider giving me a chance to prove I can be a valuable editor. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello Izno. Thank you for looking into my account. You are absolutely right to see a connection, and I want to be completely transparent: I am connected to the "Emekertan" and "Londonist DMC" accounts. When those were created, I did not fully understand Wikipedia's strict policies regarding single-account usage, undisclosed editing, and corporate usernames. My goal with this "Ertanemekturan" account was to start fresh, follow the rules properly, and be a genuinely constructive editor. As my recent contribution history shows (including the +12,000 byte update to "The King's Awards for Enterprise", completing newcomer tasks, and properly using my sandbox for drafting the Alejo Alolor biography), I am putting in real effort to improve the encyclopedia correctly. I apologize for the past multi-account confusion. I am more than happy to have the "Emekertan" and "Londonist DMC" accounts permanently locked. I only wish to abide by the rules using this single "Ertanemekturan" account moving forward to continue my positive contributions. I hope you can consider giving me a chance to prove I can be a valuable editor. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello Izno. Thank you for looking into my account. You are absolutely right to see a connection, and I want to be completely transparent: I am connected to the "Emekertan" and "Londonist DMC" accounts. When those were created, I did not fully understand Wikipedia's strict policies regarding single-account usage, undisclosed editing, and corporate usernames. My goal with this "Ertanemekturan" account was to start fresh, follow the rules properly, and be a genuinely constructive editor. As my recent contribution history shows (including the +12,000 byte update to "The King's Awards for Enterprise", completing newcomer tasks, and properly using my sandbox for drafting the Alejo Alolor biography), I am putting in real effort to improve the encyclopedia correctly. I apologize for the past multi-account confusion. I am more than happy to have the "Emekertan" and "Londonist DMC" accounts permanently locked. I only wish to abide by the rules using this single "Ertanemekturan" account moving forward to continue my positive contributions. I hope you can consider giving me a chance to prove I can be a valuable editor. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- Emekertan is globally locked as compromised - can you explain how it came to be compromised? Londonist DMC was hardblocked for spamming. That means this account, while created before that account was blocked, is still technically block evasion, as blocks apply to the person, not the account. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:48, 28 August 2026 (UTC)