User talk:Dl2000

Archives

1. Do not post or modify messages in the archives - use this current page instead.
2. And do not repost messages that have been archived!

---

• --> Archive 1: February 2006-July 2007 (initial welcome, earliest msgs)
• --> Archive 2: July 2007-April 2009 (second welcome, more msgs)
• --> Archive 3: April 2009-August 2010
• --> Archive 4: August 2010-March 2011
• --> Archive 5: March 2011-October 2011
• --> Archive 6: October 2011-March 2012
• --> Archive 7: March 2012-October 2012
• --> Archive 8: October 2012-July 2013
• --> Archive 9: July 2013-June 2014
• --> Archive 10: June 2014-January 2015
• --> Archive 11: January 2015-August 2015
• --> Archive 12: August 2015-December 2015
• --> Archive 13: December 2015-February 2018
• --> Archive 14: February 2018-April 2019
• --> Archive 15: April 2019-February 2020
• --> Archive 16: February 2020-January 2021
• --> Archive 17: January 2021-May 2023
• --> Archive 18: May 2023-January 2026

---

Your template, Template:Use Australian English, nominated for merging to Template:Use English variant

Hi there,

I nominated the templated you created at TfD Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2026_January_13#Template:Use_American_English. You are welcome to discuss. Szmenderowiecki (talk · contribs) 07:35, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

"Use British English"

Hi, I saw that you've done a great job with the "Use dmy dates" template in the Meloni government article. Would you kindly also address the BE terms (according to the "Use British English" template) in the Giorgia Meloni article (there are some "criticized")? ~2026-26684-4 (talk) 11:57, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Sidhmukh article improvement guidance

Hello Dl2000,

Thank you for your recent tidy edit on the Sidhmukh article. I appreciate the formatting improvements.

I have been working on expanding the article with official government sources and structured sections. As an experienced editor, if you have any suggestions regarding sourcing quality, structure, or steps toward meeting higher article standards, I would be grateful for your guidance.

Thank you for your time.

Best regards, Bhaveshchoudhary2020

Bhaveshchoudhary2020 (talk) 03:22, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Hey.. Related To Jagraj Singh Maan.

i had added a pic and inserted few links & info as it's my father's wiki.. Ans info was very much true Ishat22 (talk) 09:04, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Related to the EU Ethics Body article

Hi. Hi have seen your deletion of my additions to the ethics body article. This is concerning to me because ALL of the information I have put in it were sourced and (to my understanding) compliant. Can we work together to try and make it compliant to your understanding of the rules, instead of reverting all my work done in good faith ? I am not an experienced wikipedia editor so I am sure the formatting could use improvement but I spent an enormous amount of time on the sourcing and the analysis, so I am disheartened again to see it all go away the minute I look elsewhere. Thank you for your understanding and kind help on the matter. Best, Raphcmt (talk) 08:01, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Professional Game Match Officials Limited

The first two paragraphs of this article, which you and I both mistakenly replaced after deletion by a temporary user, are clearly vandalism. They should not be reinstated again. Thanks. Nick Levine (talk) 22:48, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User talk:Intrisit/MTV EMEA

The page User talk:Intrisit/MTV EMEA has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

orphaned talk page

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:38, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Kazuma Sumi

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kazuma Sumi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:11, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive

May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

"Wikipedia:SEASON" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Wikipedia:SEASON has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 8 § Wikipedia:SEASON until a consensus is reached. George Ho (talk) 00:17, 9 May 2026 (UTC); corrected, 03:50, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026

Hello Dl2000,

New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Requested revert

Hi DI2000, can you rv one of this edited done by the same person you message? I appreciate it if you reply, thanks. TBB (talk) 14:54, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

@Thebaldball: - did some cleanup, but not a full rv on that one since it wasn't a hijacking this time; but if you see something else amiss, you can edit that article as needed. Dl2000 (talk) 02:36, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Meridiana page corrections

Good morning. When making corrections, you can't just use scissors and ignore the rest. In fact, by removing the entire paragraph "In January 2007 ..... GEASAR SpA" it's unclear how Eurofly was absorbed and integrated. In this case, the bold heading of the paragraph should read "A merger" (or something similar) and not "Two mergers in four years"... Settignano (talk) 08:08, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Alhama de Granada

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Alhama de Granada, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A ISBN error. References show this error when the ISBN value or formatting is invalid. Please edit the article to ensure the value is correct, that only one ISBN is used, that the proper optional separators are used, and that no other text is included. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:29, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

British Midland Airways dates

Sorry but it is not may fault as such datas were in the previous text. Settignano (talk) 06:42, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Muzaffarpur Junction railway station

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Muzaffarpur Junction railway station, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to fix the URL. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • ["Arrival & Departures of Train at MFP". indiarailinfo.com. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:15, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Articles for Creation backlog drive

Hello Dl2000:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in August!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than a month of outstanding reviews from the current 3+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 August 2026 through 31 August 2026.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 5000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

• If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Edits to Young Woodley (play)

You recently made some edits to Young Woodley (play), leaving the comment: cleanup ref/param, possibly due to AI expansion. Could you explain what you meant by that? Thanks! Saratoga Sam (talk) 22:04, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Basically reference parameters in the article needed some cleaning up, so that was done. Although the parameters can get unruly due to AI or other factors, on further review, the speculation about AI should not have been made. However, there seems to be an issue with the length and level of detail on the plot section so the article was tagged for that. Dl2000 (talk) 02:30, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the clarification. The Synopsis section is definitely too long, but I will leave it to an editor with better writing skills to handle. My main concern in expanding the stub was to refocus on the original US production, and to detail the events surrounding the Lord Chamberlain lifting the ban on the play in the UK, the first crack in theatrical censorship there. Saratoga Sam (talk) 13:25, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Rename all categories for userboxes

Please join the discussion to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 12#All categories for userboxes. —⁠andrybak (talk) 22:33, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

Kate Bell (Australian actress)'s page information deletion.

Hi, I was looking into this page and noticed it has been stripped of a lot of factual information about the actress' biography and filmography, which is weird, because checking older versions (like the one you edited: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kate_Bell_(Australian_actress)&oldid=1262328322, it still had most of her career present, with very few inaccuracies. I think the Years active was incorrect, with 2003-2012 being the correct date. But it seems like many of the deletions were made incorrectly, despite the information confirming it not being difficult to find.

I was wondering if I could use your source to roll back the page to that previous state, adding new references and external links that back all of the information present back then and more that hadn't been added yet.

Have a nice day, mate. Greyvalentine (talk) 17:47, 22 August 2026 (UTC) Greyvalentine (talk) 17:46, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

@Greyvalentine: - You need to be aware of the need for sufficient article sourcing ([WP:SOURCE]]). The version you indicate had only one citation to support a significant amount of content. Also some previous versions depended on IMDB which is regarded as unreliable on Wikipedia, and apparently some inappropriate direct copying from that source. There's probably no justification to use a previous version, but could correct the active years if another reliable source can be found. Dl2000 (talk) 01:57, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

Well, the reason I thought about using elements from that version again was because of the formatting, with the different tables that were used for her filmography, television and award nomination, which looked on par with what we see in other artist pages. Besides, the information in it was correct for the most part, but you're right; there weren't citations or sources to back them up, other than IMDB. The categories listed in it were also accurate.

Like most Aussie artists, she does have a registry on NFSA (National Audiovisual Cultural Institution) website could be enough, since it has records of her entire filmography and is the official audiovisual archive in Australia, with a local building based in Canberra. It is not a user generated website. There are also a few articles written on Sydney Herald and other news outlets that also include interviews with her.

Her Logie Award nomination for Most Popular New Female Talent also has a source that was used for the Wikipedia page of that award in 2010. I think it could be used as a citation.

The reason I asked you, is because that old revision was mostly accurate, despite the lack of sources. So, I thought about using part of it and adding the citations that were missing and other information that had been removed, which was valid. I don't want to make it seem like I'm vandalising this page, but so much of what had been removed, wasn't really incorrect, it just lacked better sources.

Do you think a Self-Published Source, like the director's portfolio website, crediting her, or the upload of her short films on Vimeo by the directors themselves could be used as a proper source? For instance, the director of the telemovie Scorched, uploaded the entire 90 minutes extra scenes prequel/sequel, which she starred in, as Cassie Hoffman. He credits the entire cast and production team in the description. He also has that included in his website. Greyvalentine (talk) 02:36, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

Radio Battalion Page

Thank you for reaching out. I want to assure you I did not use an "AI chatbot" to produce the content I added to the Radio Battalion page. It was my first time making a significant edit and I was unsure about best practices, especially when it came to citing the same reference multiple times.

I authored the content of my edits. I am still learning my way around Wikipedia's editing UI, so nearly all of what I wrote was as a draft in Obsidian, which I added piecemeal as I went along in the "Editing Radio Battalion" Page with Preview enabled. I did not commit any changes I made until I had finished writing and had checked my work, hence the 70,057 bytes, +53,006 edit from August 22, 2026.

You can see my research trail in the retrieval dates on my references: August 3-8, 16-17, and 19-22. The range in the retrieval dates reflects the timeline of research and writing, because as I aggregated details and wrote my draft, I added sources using the citation template in the Wikipedia editor. You can also see that of the 52 sources I cited, 22 cite specific page numbers (by my manual count), which should confirm that I did in fact limit the content of my article to details corresponding to the specific sources I cited.

My references also reflect a variety of credible sources accompanied by full publication details. I consulted Official Marine Corps Publications, official unit histories and lineage documents, Marine Corps History Division publications, declassified NSA documents, National Archives primary sources, academic and intelligence community journals, books, news articles, and DVIDS. The breadth of sources and level of detail in the citations is not indicative of AI hallucinated sourcing, but rather human research.

In the interest of candor, I did use a large language model to check for errors in the formatting of references specifically and used the annotated output to manually cross reference against the formatting of my references. I want to emphasize again that the research, references, and writing were all produced by me.

I will also note that upon review of Wikipedia:NEWLLM, the guidance on acceptable LLM use cases references utility in identifying other simple mistakes. Moreover, as noted in the Wikipedia:Writing articles with large language models/RfC discussion, citation-formatting seems to have been introduced as an acceptable use case: More specialized, constructive use cases do exist, from using them as research assistants to citation-formatting tools, and this guideline does not aim to restrict any of these use cases. In each of these cases, human review was mentioned as a necessary component of use, which I demonstrably adhered to by way of having restricted use to reference formatting only.

Please let me know how I can alleviate your concerns as to the article and how best to move forward. - SL (talk) 06:09, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

The changes affected other items besides referencing e.g. invalid categories were introduced. Seems these may have been a side-effect of AI-assisted edits, so probably needed greater review and proofreading of even apparently limited AI-assisted edits. Dl2000 (talk) 00:06, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

Can you please provide more detail/elaboration regarding what specifically you believe was produced by AI?

I reviewed your changes from August 24 (ref: "symptoms of AI; rm hallucinated/nonexistent cats, cleanup some LLM artifacts"). Unless I've misunderstood, you changed dates, removed the trailing commas I had after some, but not all years, and removed five categories I added.

The changes you described as "symptoms of AI" are my errors as a first-time, and honestly after this experience, probably last-time editor. The disclaimer you attached to the top of the article states that the article may include "may include hallucinated information, copyright violations, claims not verified in cited sources, original research, or fictitious references." The edits you made don't reflect the disclaimer.

Thanks in advance, I look forward to hearing back. - SL (talk) 00:28, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

The five categories added were definitely nonexistent. AI-generation of material for Wikipedia pages can often create (or "hallucinate") nonexistent categories. But even if not AI, such red-linked categories should generally not be added to articles - see WP:REDNOT.

However, on further consideration, I will assume your use of AI was limited, intended to be within WP:NEWLLM, therefore will remove the AI notice. Dl2000 (talk) 01:28, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2026 Backlog drive

September 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 September 2026, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin at a particularly important time for NPP. The backlog has now passed 30,000 unreviewed articles, a level that has been described in current NPP discussions as exceptionally high and potentially difficult to overcome through normal reviewing alone. Backlog drives are one of the few measures that have historically produced a noticeable reduction in the backlog, so the participation of as many active patrollers as possible will matter this month. If you can review during September, please make articles your priority. Every article that is reviewed is a meaningful reduction in the backlog. With the queue at its current size, even a relatively small increase in the number of articles each patroller reviews can add up to a substantial difference over the course of the month. This is a hybrid drive, so redirect reviewing is still included. Redirects can be a useful way for newer patrollers to get comfortable with NPP and can help people build up to reviewing articles. However, the main goal of this drive is to tackle the article backlog, and experienced patrollers are particularly encouraged to spend as much of their available reviewing time on articles as they can. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. If you have been thinking about doing more NPP, this is an especially good month to jump in. Whether you can review a few pages or hundreds, every review helps. And if you are already an active patroller, please consider whether you can put in some additional time during September to help bring the backlog back under control. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:50, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Question about recent edits to Rowena Turinawe article

Hi DI2000,

I noticed that my recent edits to the Rowena Turinawe article were reverted with the edit summary “restore to last undamaged version; nonimproving wreckage of various article elements.”

I was attempting to update some outdated career information and add sourced information about her current role and recent recognition.

Could you please clarify which specific parts of my edits were problematic or did not meet Wikipedia's requirements? I would like to correct them appropriately rather than reintroduce information that does not comply with Wikipedia's guidelines.

Thank you. Geno Eric (talk) 04:55, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Your edits made a colossal mess of the article, the {{Infobox person}} section was wrecked, and the edits left a colossal oversized picture of the subject. The "image" parameter in the infobox is the appropriate place to add the photo.

Are you working with or representing Rowena Turinawe e.g. as publicist? If so, Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy applies. If not, addition of reliable sources is welcome, but please review guidelines and policies such as WP:SOURCE when adding such references.

Hope this explains the concerns with your edits. Dl2000 (talk) 00:25, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Hi DI2000,

Thank you for clarifying. Yes, I am working with Rowena professionally, so I understand that the conflict-of-interest guidance applies here. I appreciate the clarification.

My intention was to correct outdated career information and add information that is supported by reliable published sources, rather than to promote her or control the article.

I will avoid making further direct changes to the article and will instead propose any necessary updates on the Talk page for independent editors to consider. I will also review the relevant sourcing and conflict-of-interest guidelines before making any further proposals.

Regarding the image and infobox, thank you for pointing that out. I understand that the image should be handled through the appropriate infobox parameter.

If there are particular changes from my previous edits that you believe would be appropriate to propose on the Talk page, I would appreciate any guidance.

Thank you. Geno Eric (talk) 05:46, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Ewan Fernie page

Hello. I'm writing to you again to request reverting the Ewan Fernie page I updated. I take your points about References and will amend them, as well as add new links and citations that back up the statements that you suspected as promotional. Could you please reply. Thank you. Annie Annie55555 (talk) 20:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on 2026 Akçamezra tornado

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2026 Akçamezra tornado, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to fix the URL. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • "Sınırüstü Köyü'nde Hortum Dehşeti: İskele Belediyesi Teyakkuzda" [Tornado Horror in Borders Village: İskele Municipality is on Vigilance]. Kibris Press (in Turkish). 3 May 2026. Retrieved 1 October 2026. {{cite news}}: Check |url= value (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:57, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

New cross-language page link: Van Houtte

A new page فان هوت on the Arabic Wikipedia has been linked to page Van Houtte, which you created, via Wikidata (Q3554415).

You will not be notified in the future about new articles linked to any of the articles you have created, if you wish to opt in to receiving these notifications, please follow the opt-in instructions.

NervousBot (talk) 08:34, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Les Faucheurs de marguerites for merging into Where the Sky Begins

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Les Faucheurs de marguerites is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be merged into Where the Sky Begins.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Les Faucheurs de marguerites until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Οἶδα (talk) 17:48, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Zhang Tong (diplomat)

I have now removed the link to the hijacked article, so no one will be redirected there unintentionally. I have inserted a red link in their place to Zhang Tong (diplomat), so an editor could create a properly titled article. S1r Gawa1n 2004 (talk) 23:43, 10 October 2026 (UTC)

Modifications on the Grey Nuns' article

Hello! I really don't want to sound defensive, so forgive me if you feel I'm to direct (English is my second language). I wanted to thank you regarding certains modifications and tidying you made on the Grey Nuns' article. It was my first English contribution. I worked with a foundation here in Quebec (Fondation Lionel-Groulx) along with the Grey Nuns and their archives to rework their Wikipedia articles, which had lots of problems. We wanted something more factual/neutral and quite a bit longer. I also worked with the Grey Nuns to add new iconography on Wikimedia Commons.

I saw that you added mention of AI hallucinations. I'm really curious about that, as I can assure you that this text was not AI generated. It is mostly a translation of the French article, which I also wrote (I forgot to indicate that when I edited, but I added it today). It went through several rounds of re-reading and corrections in order to rectify errors and typing mistakes before I published it. Let me know how I can reassure you, in any case. I'll be glad to be of help! Lgdanny (talk) 17:40, 6 November 2026 (UTC)

Good day - seems this major edit causes a few unfortunate side effects e.g. removal of all categories, overwriting some existing text with citations, some other non-standard changes. One reference had an illogical parameter e.g. "access-date=Shattering the Silence". AI often has symptoms of such "hallucinated" text. My fixes described possible AI hallucination. However, following your explanations, can assume this was just a large edit with some side effects.

However, you mention you worked with the Grey Nuns and other groups for the article changes. This raises a potential issue with the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest policy. Please read and review that policy to determine how it may affect your further editing of the Grey Nuns' article. Dl2000 (talk) 03:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for answering so quickly. I understand. With "Shattering the Silence", I'm pretty sure it was my mistake. As I said, the article is a translation from the French article, and to my dismay, Wiki in French and English don't work exactly the same, which caused me several problems! I'm sorry if it caused any issues. It was indeed a very large edit.

As for the conflict of interest, I understand, but again I can assure you that I was thorough. I disclaimed it on my personnal page, as I already do in French. All of the work done on Wikipedia by the Fondation Lionel-Groulx is part of a project called "chantier Wikipédia" which aims at enhancing Wiki articles concerning the history of Quebec and, more largely, French America. It's done in partnership with the Wikimedia Foundation and other institutions, such as Quebec's National Library and Archives (BANQ). I've provided you a link if you want to check it out! Lgdanny (talk) 15:31, 10 November 2026 (UTC)