User talk:DimensionalFusion

Nomination of 2026 Georgia political party advisory election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2026 Georgia political party advisory election, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 Georgia political party advisory election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of MPs elected in the 1780 British general election, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Townshend was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2012 Florida Senate election, a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Simmons was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Investigations (Star Trek Voyager).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Investigations (Star Trek Voyager).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 03:22, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Emissary (Star Trek Deep Space Nine).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Emissary (Star Trek Deep Space Nine).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:32, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited House of Representatives (Japan), a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Reform Party was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:54, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

FA review of Semiotics

Hello DimensionalFusion and thanks for your GA review of the article Declarative knowledge a while back! I was wondering whether you may be interested in reviewing the article Semiotics at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Semiotics/archive1 since the nomination hasn't received much feedback so far. Thank you for taking a look and please feel under no obligation if now is not a good time. Phlsph7 (talk) 09:35, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

I can certainly have a quick look, but I haven't ever done an FA review before so I may not find myself in a position to contribute to the review! DimensionalFusion (talk) 11:33, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look! The FA criteria are not that different from the GA criteria. Since there are several reviewers at FA, it's not necessary for each reviewer to assess all aspects of the article. So if you want, you could just limit your review to a specific aspect that you feel confident in assessing, such as a prose review. Phlsph7 (talk) 12:28, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Participate in the October 2026 GAN drive!!

Good article nominations | October 2026 Backlog Drive
October 2026 Backlog Drive: A one-month backlog drive for good article nominations has begun since 3 October. The top 5 participants who scored the most points will get special awards based on their placement! (Optional) competition between Team Media and Team Society... who will win?? Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted a good article review in the past year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:09, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

New cross-language page link: 2026 Holborn and St Pancras by-election

A new page 2026年英國下議院霍本及聖潘克拉斯選區補選 on the Chinese Wikipedia has been linked to the page 2026 Holborn and St Pancras by-election, which you created, via Wikidata (Q141247453).

You will not be notified about future links to pages you created. To opt in to these notifications, follow the opt-in instructions.

NervousBot (talk) 22:05, 7 October 2026 (UTC)