User talk:Crystal Drawers

Your nomination of Dr. Mario: Miracle Cure has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Dr. Mario: Miracle Cure has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OceanHok -- OceanHok (talk) 03:02, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Chapter Seven: The Lost Sister

On 26 April 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chapter Seven: The Lost Sister, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the character Eleven's outfit in an episode of Stranger Things was inspired by Madonna's clothing in the 1980s? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chapter Seven: The Lost Sister. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Chapter Seven: The Lost Sister), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Malcolm in the Middle season 1 has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Malcolm in the Middle season 1 has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 17:03, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Chapter Three: The Case of the Missing Lifeguard has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Chapter Three: The Case of the Missing Lifeguard has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Metalicat -- Metalicat (talk) 22:02, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

WP:GARC: Invitation to review Victoria Pendleton

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review Victoria Pendleton. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#84.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:21, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Bowling (Malcolm in the Middle) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Bowling (Malcolm in the Middle) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vanderwaalforces -- Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:01, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 May newsletter

The second round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 April. As a reminder for contestants who just joined or are unaware of recent changes to our round-points system, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 2 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; nine scored over 500; and fourteen scored over 300. The top seven contestants had at least one featured article (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• MCE89 (submissions) with 1,333 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,169 points, mainly from good and featured articles related to shipping ethics controversy in fanfiction, waterways, and Gu Yanwu
• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,149 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, and featured lists about figure skating, along with many article reviews and two good topics
• Olliefant (submissions) with 830 points, mainly from good and featured articles about television shows, episodes and media, along with nearly four dozen good and featured article reviews
• Gommeh (submissions) with 827 points, mainly from good and featured articles related to Genshin Impact and Honkai: Star Rail

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 13 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 106 good articles, 22 good-topic articles and more than 40 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 3 In the News articles, and they have conducted over 200 reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Bowling (Malcolm in the Middle) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Bowling (Malcolm in the Middle) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vanderwaalforces -- Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:21, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Promotion of List of Malcolm in the Middle episodes

Congratulations, Crystal Drawers! The list you nominated, List of Malcolm in the Middle episodes, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 23:25, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposal to improve articles from the SpongeBob SquarePants series

Hello @Crystal Drawers:. I'm writing to ask if you'd be interested in upgrading the SpongeBob SquarePants episode articles to make them GAs, like "Christmas Who?", "Shanghaied", "Krusty Krab Training Video", and "Mid-Life Crustacean". Given the excellent work you've done with the Malcolm in the Middle and Arrested Development episodes, I think it would be a great idea. What do you think? ~2026-28586-89 (talk) 22:55, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for the proposal! However, I’m currently taking a break from working on new articles, and, after I’m done with some projects I have nominated, I’m probably gonna take a wikibreak, so I’m gonna have to decline (especially given I don’t know a lot about SpongeBob and it’s production, and I haven’t thought about the series in a good while) Crystal Drawers 🎖️ ^{(wanna talk?)} 23:27, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Malcolm in the Middle season 1

On 27 May 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Malcolm in the Middle season 1, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bryan Cranston wore a suit of 10,000 bees for a scene in the first season of Malcolm in the Middle, but was stung only once? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Malcolm in the Middle season 1. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Malcolm in the Middle season 1), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Editor of the Week

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Pokelego999 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I nominate Crystal Drawers to be Editor of the Week. Within the past year, they have gotten twenty-eight articles to GA status, primarily in the form of American television episodes, a much neglected space where this work is highly valuable. They have 7544 edits w/ 62% in Mainspace and 18 self-described "semi-quality" articles created in first year of editing. Additionally, one of their articles, The One Where Michael Leaves has achieved FA. This is valuable work with a remarkably high content quality overall, and they deserve some recognition for it. This nomination was seconded by TechnoSquirrel69 and Vanderwaalforces

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}

Thanks again for your efforts! Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 14:06, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Wow, I’m at a loss for words lol, thank you all so much, I never saw this coming ever and didn’t expect to be selected for something so prestigious only like a year into my Wikipedia editing. My wanting to edit Wikipedia has slowly been dying down a bit but this genuinely made my whole day, and kind of motivated me to keep on editing in a way? Thank you all again, and a big thank you to Pokelego999 for nominating me in the first place :) Crystal Drawers 🎖️ ^{(wanna talk?)} 14:19, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

WP:GARC: Invitation to review Battle of Sena Gallica (551)

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review Battle of Sena Gallica (551). At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#93.

A.Cython(talk) 02:20, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Malcolm in the Middle season 2 is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Malcolm in the Middle season 2 is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 11:04, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Dungeons & Dealers is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Dungeons & Dealers is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 04:43, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Dungeons & Dealers is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Dungeons & Dealers has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 23:02, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Malcolm in the Middle season 2 has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Malcolm in the Middle season 2 has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 11:24, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marta Complex, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Russo was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:28, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Dungeons & Dealers has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Dungeons & Dealers has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 02:22, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Some dice for you!

Assorted Dice

Congrats on getting Dungeons & Dealers to GA status! Take a whole heaping of roleplaying dice to help you win weed from a DnD game. Looks like all you need now is to get He's Gotta Have It to GA status and all the Ted episodes will be GAs. (Pssst, if you nominate it for GA status again, I’d be happy to review it. Just send me a message through my talk page). Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 02:31, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, Crystal Drawers. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Malcolm in the Middle episodes – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 10. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 00:26, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

Question

I noticed that you do not plan to edit in WP for the summer . Should I assume that you do not have time to conclude the assigned GARC review? If you do not, I understand. I will then request a closure at the GA talk page and resubmit. Enjoy the summer. A.Cython(talk) 02:33, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the message. I plan on doing the review tomorrow morning (it’s Friday night in my time zone, for reference). Apologies for the wait again Crystal Drawers 🎖️ ^{(wanna talk?)} 02:43, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

In this case, I am looking forward to your comments. A.Cython(talk) 14:43, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

TFA

Thank you today for The One Where Michael Leaves, introduced: '"I'm afraid I just blue myself" Ah, season two of Arrested Development, possibly the finest television season of all time. I've been editing Wikipedia for a few months now, and Arrested Development articles have been a significant part of my editing since the very beginning. No episodes of Arrested Development are at FA status yet, and I find that lack of the Bluths to be quite disturbing, so here I am to change that! The article details the second season premiere of the series, going in-depth into it's development with several behind the scenes details, offering poignant analysis of multiple different faucets of the episode, and is held together by a solid reception section.' - Enjoy your first TFA day! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:52, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Precious

television episodes

Thank you for quality articles around episodes such as The One Where Michael Leaves, List of Malcolm in the Middle episodes, Chapter Seven: The Lost Sister, for quality reviewing, for seeing publishing as "a dopamine rush like no other", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 3035 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:37, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Keep it up!!

I also love arrested development!! Huge congrats on getting The One Where Michael Leaves to FA :) Keep up the great work! JordyGrey _talk🧸 00:56, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Crystal Drawers 🎖️ ^{(wanna talk?)} 01:13, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of The Most Wonderful Time of the Year (2024 film) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article The Most Wonderful Time of the Year (2024 film) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 05:47, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 July newsletter

The third round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 June at 23:59 (UTC). As a reminder, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, while peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 3 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; eight scored over 500; and thirteen scored over 300. The top three contestants had at least one featured article (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• MCE89 (submissions) with 1567 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography, as well as some article reviews
• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1547 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, featured lists, and a good topic about figure skating, along with 20 article reviews
• Reconrabbit (submissions) with 1004 points, mainly from a high-multiplier featured article on European rabbit and several good articles, DYKs, and reviews
• A.Cython (submissions) with 1004 points, mainly from good articles about warfare, along with 22 article reviews
• Generalissima (submissions) with 859 points, mainly from good and featured articles about rivers and East Asian topics

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 7 featured-topic articles, 117 good articles, 74 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 13 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 180 reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Señoritis

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Señoritis".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:24, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Fallout (Arrested Development)

Hello, Crystal Drawers. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Fallout".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:00, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of The Yellow Lotus is under review

Your good article nomination of the article The Yellow Lotus is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 09:47, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of The Yellow Lotus is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article The Yellow Lotus has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 19:27, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of Arrested Development guest stars

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Arrested Development guest stars, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:09, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Pearl Harbor (Malcolm in the Middle)

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Pearl Harbor".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

WP:GARC: Invitation to review Theudebert I

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review Theudebert I. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#99.

A.Cython(talk) 23:29, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 22:23, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Bottle Episode (The Simpsons) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Bottle Episode (The Simpsons) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RedShellMomentum -- RedShellMomentum (talk) 01:02, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Bottle Episode (The Simpsons) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Bottle Episode (The Simpsons) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RedShellMomentum -- RedShellMomentum (talk) 03:01, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

WP:GARC: Invitation to review Ohuan

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review Ohuan. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#100.

Vestrian24Bio 10:07, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Resolutions (miniseries)

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Resolutions (miniseries), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of The Past and the Furious is under review

Your good article nomination of the article The Past and the Furious is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 16:48, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of The Yellow Lotus has passed

Your good article nomination of the article The Yellow Lotus has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 00:27, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jessica Walter on screen and stage

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jessica Walter on screen and stage, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Why Are We Here? (Everybody Loves Raymond)

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Why Are We Here? (Everybody Loves Raymond), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:09, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of The Most Wonderful Time of the Year (2024 film) is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article The Most Wonderful Time of the Year (2024 film) has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:27, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of The Past and the Furious is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article The Past and the Furious has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 11:47, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of The Most Wonderful Time of the Year (2024 film) is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article The Most Wonderful Time of the Year (2024 film) has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 19:27, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Treehouse of Horror XXXV is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Treehouse of Horror XXXV is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 07:48, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of The Most Wonderful Time of the Year (2024 film) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article The Most Wonderful Time of the Year (2024 film) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 08:47, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Maeby Fünke

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Maeby Fünke".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:25, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Oscar Bluth

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Oscar Bluth".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:25, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Arrested Development Documentary Project

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Arrested Development Documentary Project, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Treehouse of Horror XXXV is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Treehouse of Horror XXXV has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 15:27, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of The Past and the Furious has passed

Your good article nomination of the article The Past and the Furious has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 11:27, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ejectile Dysfunction

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ejectile Dysfunction, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Chapter Four: The Sauna Test

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Chapter Four: The Sauna Test".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 22:25, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Car Pool Lane

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Car Pool Lane".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:25, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Chicken dance (Arrested Development)

Hello, Crystal Drawers. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Chicken dance".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:30, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Club Soda and Salt

Hello, Crystal Drawers. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Club Soda and Salt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:58, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Subways, Bicycles and Automobiles

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Subways, Bicycles and Automobiles, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frank the Plank, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Gallagher was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of Arrested Development guest stars

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of Arrested Development guest stars".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 22:23, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Treehouse of Horror XXXV has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Treehouse of Horror XXXV has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:28, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Resolutions (miniseries)

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Resolutions (miniseries), was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:13, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Why Are We Here? (Everybody Loves Raymond)

Hello, Crystal Drawers. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Why Are We Here?".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:46, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Good article nominations RfC

Hi Crystal Drawers,

There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.

By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.

Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox^{(talk|contributions)} 16:02, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Theo Faiss

Hi Crystal Drawers, hope you're doing well—and thank you again for reviewing In Memory of Theo Faiss when it was recently at FAC. The article on its namesake is now itself a candidate, although the nomination has stalled a little bit while resolving ancillary issues. Any chacne you might be interested in, and have time to, take a look? Any help getting it back on track would be much appreciated, but of course no worries if not! Cheers, --Usernameunique (talk) 18:11, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

Apologizes for the last reply, I typed out a response but apparently forgot to press “Reply” so here it is: Hello! Thank you for your kind words, I’m doing well, and congrats on the promotion of In Memory of Theo Faiss! Good luck with your current FAC, but I don’t think I’ll be able to review it at the time, as I’ve honestly lost interest in reviewing a bit (for both FACs and GANs) and would like to take a little break. If I get into the reviewing mood soon I’ll definitely check the article out (hopefully while it’s still up for FAC, if it’s not promoted/archived by then), sorry if this is disappointing. Hope you’re doing well! Crystal Drawers 🎖️ ^{(wanna talk?)} 19:30, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Artificial Fruit

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Artificial Fruit, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Chapter Three: The Case of the Missing Lifeguard

Chapter Three: The Case of the Missing Lifeguard has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:06, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Subways, Bicycles and Automobiles

Hello, Crystal Drawers. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Subways".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:15, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Chapter Five: Dig Dug

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chapter Five: Dig Dug, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Extreme Makeover: Homer Edition is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Extreme Makeover: Homer Edition is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 21:04, 26 August 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The History of The Simpsons Hit & Run World Records

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The History of The Simpsons Hit & Run World Records".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:23, 27 August 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 September newsletter

The fourth round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 29 August at 23:59 (UTC). Everyone who competed in round 4 will advance to round 5 unless they have withdrawn or been removed. Round 4 was competitive, though slightly less so than round 3. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; six scored over 500; and nine scored over 300. Each of the top five competitors had hundreds of points accumulated from multiple GAs. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,318 points, mostly from 13 good articles and 3 featured articles about creeks and Chinese and Japanese subjects
• Vanderwaalforces (submissions) with 1,208 points from 2 featured articles, 2 featured lists, and 12 good articles about African leaders, along with over two dozen reviews
• A.Cython (submissions) with 1,084 points from 16 good articles and a small good topic about warfare and Greek elections, along with over two dozen reviews
• Vestrian24Bio (submissions) with 955 points, mostly from 2 FLs, 2 featured topics, and 16 GAs about cricket, and almost two dozen reviews
• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 837 points from 4 FLs and 8 GAs about figure skating, along with two dozen reviews

The full scores for round 4 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 10 featured articles, 11 featured lists, 8 featured-topic articles, 103 good articles, 6 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 11 In the News articles, and they have conducted 170 peer reviews, FA and GA reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed in Round 5. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cultural impact of Stranger Things 4

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cultural impact of Stranger Things 4, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rollerskates (Malcolm in the Middle)

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rollerskates (Malcolm in the Middle), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Arrested Development and Philosophy: They've Made a Huge Mistake

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Arrested Development and Philosophy: They've Made a Huge Mistake".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:24, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of Ted (TV series) characters

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Ted (TV series) characters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Yellow Boat.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yellow Boat.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:25, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Bringing up Buster GA Nomination

Hey brother. Just a courtesy message to let you know I nominated this article for Good Article status, and I intend to continue your good work with Arrested Development. This is actually my first GA nomination, and as you are another significant contributor, I thought I'd let you know. Also pinging @Mjks28 Edlectro28 (talk) 21:51, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Always happy to see more AD editors! But right now I’m not sure the article is GAN ready. Right now, the Themes section is a bit underdeveloped when I know for a fact it could definitely be longer and there’s a lot more info to include, especially from books revolving around AD’s themes. Production could also be expanded, especially on Steve Holt’s casting which I know has a solid amount of info out there. The Reception section is also missing some viewer info that is in other articles, and the reviews are mainly just quotes that need to be expanded upon in your own words (there’s also more reviews not being used). The citations also need to be fixed and expanded upon (check out other AD GAs and their citations to see what I mean; wiki links, keeping the format consistent for titles, archiving urls when available, etc). Also, sources like Deconstructing Arrested Development are not reliable for Wikipedia use, at least I believe so. It’s definitely a good start and has GA potential, and I believe you could do it :) Crystal Drawers 🎖️ ^{(wanna talk?)} 22:42, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Hi! With how long Ga reviews take, I was gonna keep Improving whilst waiting. I’ve not had a chance to fully check the citations so will do that. Regarding deconstructing, basically yeah, it’s a blog and not reliable, but the information it’s giving us is so plainly obvious I thought it was okay, and I couldn’t find any sources of a writer explicitly saying it. I’ll have a deeper look. A lot of search results ended up being for buster posey hahaha. Anyway, I’ll keep going at it, could be months till I get a reviewer, especially considering the person doing yours quickly got banned for sock puppeting Edlectro28 (talk) 22:47, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Sounds good! Im not planning on working on any AD articles at the moment, but if you’d like I could take a look and assist in any way I can with with the article (although most likely over the weekend). Also, regarding the last point, I believe only a handful of the articles were reviewed by that person, most were actually reviewed by a variety of users, so I wouldn’t worry about having to wait too long for your nom to be picked up Crystal Drawers 🎖️ ^{(wanna talk?)} 22:59, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

If you have time, but don’t go out of your way. I only have so much time because I’ve been ill this year. Good point about the review quotes by the way, I didn’t write them, yes they’re just direct quotes it seems Edlectro28 (talk) 23:00, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

It’s no problem at all. I’m very sorry to hear that you’ve been ill, I’ll keep you in my prayers, please take care 🙏 Crystal Drawers 🎖️ ^{(wanna talk?)} 23:04, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Appreciate that so much. I don’t know, but for me, I’m struggling with source scarcity, so if you have some useful sources I’ve missed you could lend me, that’d be much appreciated Edlectro28 (talk) 23:54, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

I’d look through some of the AD themed analysis books, I’ve used quite a few in the articles I’ve edited for the series, and they are the best for Analysis. I haven’t touched the article in a few months so I don’t really remember any of the sources i had tried to keep in mind to expand it with, so you should continue looking by searching through Google, I’d recommend. I’d also strongly advise unnominating the article for now until you’re sure it’s ready, an article going through heavy reconstructing that is still having sources for it be searched for should not be a nominee, and it could be quickfailed by a reviewer seeing that Crystal Drawers 🎖️ ^{(wanna talk?)} 15:57, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

I have actually pretty much extracted as much as I can by now, so this is a bit redundant. I'd push back on removing it from nomination, it is not going through 'heavy reconstructing.' I know I may not be as established as yourself, but I think I should be given a chance rather than be dismissed. No offence Edlectro28 (talk) 16:01, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Oh I didn’t mean to offend you, I apologize if I did, i was trying to offer constructive criticism. It has nothing to do with your experience as an editor, I would recommend to anyone that an article should only be nominated if it’s completely ready. Looking through it, Deconstructing AD is still used as a source, it should be removed since it appears to be nothing more than a blog. I also seem to remember finding info on Justin Grant Wade’s Steve Holt audition having some details on like what he had to say in other sources, if you could find those that would help expand it. Some of the book sources are also not formatted properly, clicking onto the text doesnt bring you down to Bibliography like it should, I also feel Themes and analysis could be expanded upon, try searching through And Philosophy and A State Of on Internet Archive to find more instances of mentioning the episode. The writing in Reception could also be fixed, some of the reviews could be given more detail and the phrasing of sentences like “Brian Tallerico from Vulture ranking the episode twelfth[22] and Jim Halden ranking it first” should be corrected. It’s definitely coming along nicely now and has improved! Crystal Drawers 🎖️ ^{(wanna talk?)} 16:08, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Bibliography issue was just me putting in the wrong date. I got some info on the steve holt audition too which i added. I have looked through both of those books on google books, but I'll look through on internet archive. Edlectro28 (talk) 16:14, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, after another look around I'm really sure I've extracted pretty much all I can. I don't know, maybe I'm an idiot, but the article isn't as bad Edlectro28 (talk) 16:38, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

If you're not doing AD stuff, I might try and take a crack at improving it over the next few months. Edlectro28 (talk) 21:16, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Sounds good. I don’t have much interest in editing for AD now so I appreciate that others have taken over in improving the episode articles. On the front page of the AD WikiProject, I wrote a guide a few months ago under “Goals” for how to write an ideal AD article, feel free to check it out Crystal Drawers 🎖️ ^{(wanna talk?)} 16:01, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ted season 1

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ted season 1, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:10, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Artificial Fruit

Hello, Crystal Drawers. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Artificial Fruit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:42, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

WP:GARC: Invitation to review 1966 Liechtenstein general election

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review 1966 Liechtenstein general election. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#135.

Vestrian24Bio 07:12, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Homer? A Cracker Bro? is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Homer? A Cracker Bro? is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 10:47, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Chapter Five: Dig Dug

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Chapter Five: Dig Dug".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:23, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Gwimbly: Definitive Remastered Enhanced Extended Edition DX 4K (Anniversary Director's Cut)

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gwimbly: Definitive Remastered Enhanced Extended Edition DX 4K (Anniversary Director's Cut), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Dr. Mario (series)

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dr. Mario (series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Chapter Four: Will the Wise

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chapter Four: Will the Wise, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Chapter Two: The Mall Rats

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chapter Two: The Mall Rats, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Cultural impact of Stranger Things 4

Hello, Crystal Drawers. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Cultural impact of Stranger Things 4".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:37, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Poorhouse Rock is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Poorhouse Rock is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 01:28, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Poorhouse Rock is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Poorhouse Rock has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 03:28, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rollerskates (Malcolm in the Middle)

Hello, Crystal Drawers. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rollerskates".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:25, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

A treehouse for you!

	A treehouse
	For getting Poorhouse Rock to GA status, take a treehouse! Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 02:37, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! 😊 Crystal Drawers 🎖️ ^{(wanna talk?)} 02:54, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Poorhouse Rock has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Poorhouse Rock has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 02:47, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Homer? A Cracker Bro? has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Homer? A Cracker Bro? has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 16:45, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Extreme Makeover: Homer Edition is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Extreme Makeover: Homer Edition has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 00:23, 8 October 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of Ted (TV series) characters

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of Ted (TV series) characters".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 22:23, 13 October 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Todd Chavez

Hello, Crystal Drawers. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Todd Chavez".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:42, 14 October 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Benadryl Brownie

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Benadryl Brownie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 17 October 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Every Little Thing (Beatles song) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Every Little Thing (Beatles song) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Carnival of Lights -- Carnival of Lights (talk) 05:03, 19 October 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dr. Mario (series)

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dr. Mario".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:24, 25 October 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Chapter Four: Will the Wise

Hello, Crystal Drawers. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Chapter Four: Will the Wise".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 22:23, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Every Little Thing (Beatles song) is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Every Little Thing (Beatles song) has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Carnival of Lights -- Carnival of Lights (talk) 06:23, 28 October 2026 (UTC)