Jump to content

User talk:Cl00m)Red

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 months ago by TonyBallioni in topic Pending changes reviewer granted

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Cl00m)Red! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 22:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

uw-selfrevert

[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your anti-vandalism work! I was about to warn ~2026-30221-13 (talk · contribs), but you beat me to it. In case you don't know about it, I thought I'd let you know about the existence of the template {{subst:uw-selfrevert}}, which is useful for cases like that one where someone reverted their own editing test. (I'm not sure whether it's an option in UltraViolet, but it is available in Twinkle.) Cadddr (talk) 18:30, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Nice to meet you, and thanks for telling me about the self-revert option. I didn’t notice it at the time, but I just checked and it is in the UltraViolet warning menu. I’m not sure how I missed it. Thanks for the heads-up! Cl00m)Red -|talk|- 21:29, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

MOS:US

[edit]

Hi! I'm about to revert/undo a bunch of your recent updates. Could you please read MOS:US instead of changing from "US" to "U.S."? Thank you. Servite et contribuere (talk) 09:13, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Actually, I might not have understood your edits at first the more I think about it and look at it. This might need further discussion. Maybe I made a mistake, which is fine as we all make mistakes. But since I have now reverted all of them, there probably should be a broader discussion. I felt like reverting these was the right decision, but I am not so sure now. We should bring other editors in to discuss to be frank. Servite et contribuere (talk) 09:20, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi! MOS:US dictates the one should "retain U.S. in American or Canadian English articles in which it is already established". So, I go into Gerlad Ford, for example, see 31 instances of U.S. and 3 instances of US, so I change US to U.S. to make the whole thing consistent. I am confused which aspect of MOS:US I violated. Cl00m)Red -|talk|- 12:07, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Wanted to clarify that I am already familiar with MOS:US and have not been changing the US formatting indiscriminately. I look at the article and makes changes that comply with the Style Guide to make it all consistent. I know that the "US" formatting is preferred formatting if the "U.S." is not already established, so I change it to make it agree with the rest of the article. I do acknowledge could have absolutely made mistakes though. Cl00m)Red -|talk|- 14:20, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
I am quite familiar. It applies to established usages, and I think it also heavily encouraged to use "US" over "U.S." when creating articles for example, or adding it in. I am honestly a bit confused here myself. Servite et contribuere (talk) 14:22, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
MOS has both a default preference for “US” and a separate instruction to retain established “U.S.” usage in articles where it’s already consistent. For the edits I was making, I was trying to follow the latter and standardize to the article’s existing style rather than change it globally. I do agree the wording can be a little ambiguous in practice, though, especially when both principles seem applicable. Cl00m)Red -|talk|- 14:40, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Pending changes reviewer granted

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

TonyBallioni (talk) 04:06, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply