Jump to content

User talk:Arch5445

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!

Hello, Arch5445, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 03:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Maysoon al-Nahar concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Maysoon al-Nahar, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maysoon al-Nahar has been accepted

[edit]
Maysoon al-Nahar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 07:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Visions (September 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Arch5445! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Visions has been accepted

[edit]
New Visions, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Netherzone (talk) 22:56, 14 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Netherzone! It has been a long wait getting this article out (since Dec 2023). You have made my day [and those of my fellow collaborators] in accepting it! Arch5445 (talk) 16:59, 5 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Omg I just saw this and I'm absolutely thrilled. This is such an important topic and not getting it published in 2023 was just such a gutting experience. It's made my day that this information is now accessible to all. Windsorchair (talk) 16:37, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Even more so with the flood of interest in Sliman Mansour since he passed away 2 days ago - and so important to make sure the female artists within this group aren't removed from the record (as we part of the rejection in 2023 - the argument being it should just be a part of Sliman Mansour's page). Arch5445 (talk) 12:02, 26 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Imagine that would have happened! So disrespectful to an important art movement and the process of collaboration to assign its importance only to the most famous member. I also came back to this page when I read he was getting ready to leave us and felt grateful we were able to publish this and help preserve a small part of his incredible legacy. ~2026-46511-23 (talk) 13:51, 26 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
<3 thank you!! I went through the other members pages yesterday and they all have book references mentioning the New Visions, so it could be worth reviewing those and adding them as relevant too. I guess some images would be really cool to add to from wikimedia or something Arch5445 (talk) 14:14, 27 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 47 Bootham, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mary Thompson was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply