User talk:Ailamnos

Your submission at Articles for creation: Franciszek Adamczak has been accepted

Franciszek Adamczak, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Orthodox Church of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross, Kraków

What you write is nonsense and pure vandalism.Jeremiah Z. Cockroach (talk) 12:42, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Orthodox Church of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross, Kraków

A "Ukrainian parish in Poland" is just nonsense. There is no such thing. Read about Greek Catholics and what they call their churches.Jeremiah Z. Cockroach (talk) 13:11, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

@Jeremiah Z. Cockroach The parish we are talking about belongs to the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church and is situated in Poland. This is what I meant by a "Ukrainian parish in Poland". I would be curious to know why you consider this is "just nonsense". An Eastern rite church is called cerkiew in Polish, церква (tserkva) in Ukrainian, and церковь (tserkov) in Russian, independently of it being catholic (Rome-dependent) or orthodox (Constantinople-dependent). So any of these three words cannot be automatically translated in English as an "orthodox church"; you have to check to which church the particular parish belongs. I would also like to know why you think the Russian word tserkov is appropriate for a community using Ukrainian language and situated in Poland. All these informations can be checked on the church webpage. As you made two unargumented reversals on the page, I am adding a 'Disputed' tag. Ailamnos (talk) 13:30, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your email

Wikipedia has rules about how I may reply, and I have to do so without quoting matters raised and without making direct replies to point susceptible of revealing the content. I choose to conduct Wikipedia business in plain sight. So I will make the best reply I am able.

I have no understanding of the exact topic you raise. If I had an understanding I might choose to involve myself in the discussions about it, or I might choose not to. See my final paragraph below

I think you have outlined a difference of opinion over content. You are certain you are correct and one or more others are certain that they are correct. This is annoying for each of you and hard to resolve without help.

The steps to follow are:

• First, engage with them, ideally on the article's talk page, and seek a resolution quietly, with politeness, and with the ability to reach a compromise if one is available. My sense, however, is that there is no compromise available in this case.
• Then, if agreement and resolution is unavailable, seek hep at WP:DRN. This is a place were disputes are brought to a mediated outcome. It is essential that all steps are followed for the volunteers to accept the dispute for resolution.

There is no form of senior management role to enforce mandatory resolution. Wikipedia only runs by consensus. DRN provides a calm head to seek to help parties in a dispute to create consensus. We are all bound by consensus, whether we agree with it or disagree with it.

A wholly valid alternative is to walk peaceably away from the dispute, considering that another editor will solve it at some point in the future. Wikipedia is not about our personal need to 'correct great wrongs', but is about our need to to our best, which may include walking away in order to preserve our own peace of mind. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 23:03, 14 March 2026 (UTC)