User talk:Aciram

Agnolo Bronzino – ”Portrait of Lucrezia Panciatichi” (circa 1540). Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence.

The Goddess Demeter.

Expanded article about Milia Dayan

Hello, during the last few days, I have researched and rewritten the biography of Milia Dayan that you started some time ago. Also, I have found a picture of her that I could even improve with the permitted assistance of AI. - If you like, you could use this version and the sources for your version in Swedish. BTW, looking at the sources you had inserted, I noticed that you wrote "Storbritannien" for Routledge, where it should read in English: London, Routledge. ("Storbritannien" is the United Kingdom in Wikipedia.) Best regards, Munfarid1 (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

Poor sourcing for Women's March on Versailles

Hello @Aciram, about your revision: Special:Diff/1372151360

You've introduced two sources with page numbers that do not support what you've written. Are you looking at other editions? Do you have links or quotes?

1. Week at Versailles: The Town, the Palace, the Park, the Trianon Palaces: page 71 does not support what you've written:
2. The French Revolution: A Study in Democracy: page 151 does not support what you've written:

Please fix these sources, otherwise I'll have to revert this. It would also be helpful if you could please use a citation format of somekind (note that the article currently uses Template:sfn citations throughout). The article is GA status, so it's important that we keep it up to that standard so that it isn't nominated for GA reassessment. — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 20:43, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

Are you aware that you can adjust the phrasing yourself, since you have access to the sources? The main purpose here, is to identfy and link the two women who was present with the queen during this historic event. If you indeed have access to the sources, as it appear you have, then this whole matter will be resolved much more swiftly, if you just adjust the words at the same time as you read the source. By that method, much time can be saved. Have a nice day. --Aciram (talk) 20:50, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

Can you please provide the correct page numbers that you used? This is a GA article, so we need to take care to provide the correct citations. It would save us both the time if you could provide those page numbers. — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 20:58, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

Those were the page numbers I was provided by the digital version I looked through. Since you corrected me above in this very conversation, and clearly stated that you have checked the pages: then I must assume, that you have access to these sources and can look at the pages yourself. Because of this reason, I must assume, that you are able to correct them if they are wrong. Otherwise I am confused as to how you can say the pages numbers are wrong.--Aciram (talk) 21:02, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

I no longer have access to open the sorces. But I did a quick look at google now, and it does show the same pages I used: --Aciram (talk) 21:04, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

With your last revision, it looks like everything is supported by the citations. — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 21:23, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

Madaluzza Contarini Page

I stumbled upon the page you created for Maddalena Contarini. I enjoy women’s history and have been trying to do research on her she has piqued my interest! It’s been difficult finding anything else about her in Italian archives. If you happen to find anything else or know of more info may you please contact me back and let me know? Thank you! ~2026-48805-26 (talk) 06:01, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, and the same: I am not Italian, so I assume those with access to Italian sources would have a better chance - though this s, one must remember, a niche subject. --Aciram (talk) 15:12, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

New cross-language page link: Judit Dukai Takách

A new page Judit Dukai Takách on the German Wikipedia has been linked to your page Judit Dukai Takách via Wikidata (Q910964).

You will not be notified in the future about new articles linked to any of the articles you have created, if you wish to opt-in to receiving these notifications, please follow the opt-in instructions.

NervousBot (talk) 22:06, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Kate Hamilton moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kate Hamilton. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has unattributed speculation, e.g. “ She has been assumed to be…”, “Kate is described as the Queen of Night”, “a contemporary described her”. Also the use of “Storbritannien” in the references suggests an unspecified translation, and the references all end with “p.” but no page numbers. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Northernhenge (talk) 20:31, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

@Northernhenge By moving this article to draft space, it will, in fact, be deleted. I firmly support the Wikipedia principle that no article is ever complete, and that any article can be improved by any contributor with knowledge who notice issues in an article. By moving the article to draftspace, you make the improvement and excistence of the article dependant on one single editor (me) instead of allowing any editor with time and knowledge who notice any issue to improve the article. To move an article to draftspace therefore, is deeply destructive to the mprovement of the article. The article will now linger in draft space for a while, and then it will be deleted - instead of being improved by any editor who comes across it, as any other article on wikipedia. I am sorry to see the article be deleted.

As for "the use of Storbritannien in reference", the answer is: I am from sweden and my laptop is situated in Sweden, hence the formating of the reference is in Swedish: however, the text inside of the referenced book is still in English (foreign language references are still allowed). The book page numbers were sadly not available in digitalised copies. As for the sentences, they can simply be rephrased.

I am truly sorry to hear that English language Wikipedia has abandoned the principle that "An article is never ready and are open to thousands of editors to improve", and instead have started to delete articles by placing them in draftspace and make their existence dependant upon one single user. I would have preferred that you place an improvement template in the article: that way, thousands of editors will be given the oportunity to improve it, instead of just one. A draftspace-policy is deeply destructive for wikipedia. Have a nice day. --Aciram (talk) 23:29, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Maître Pierre (poisoner)

Hello, Aciram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maître Pierre (poisoner), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:14, 22 October 2026 (UTC)

I have already stated that I do not support the article being moved to draft space to begin with, since it means it only person can improve it, instead of all the users of wikipedia. The person who has moved it to draft space, has essentially decided that the article should be deleted instead of improved. That was my statement then, and it remains the same. It is a shame that we cannot follow the rule that says an article on wikipedia is never finnished, but can be edited by everyone. In order to support this statement, I refuse to edit the article. You may therefore deleted it. --Aciram (talk) 19:51, 22 October 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:François Galaup de Chasteuil

Hello, Aciram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:François Galaup de Chasteuil, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:14, 22 October 2026 (UTC)

I have already stated that I do not support the article being moved to draft space to begin with, since it means it only person can improve it, instead of all the users of wikipedia. The person who has moved it to draft space, has essentially decided that the article should be deleted instead of improved. That was my statement then, and it remains the same. It is a shame that we cannot follow the rule that says an article on wikipedia is never finnished, but can be edited by everyone. In order to support this statement, I refuse to edit the article. You may therefore delete it. --Aciram (talk) 19:52, 22 October 2026 (UTC)