User talk:AbhijnanGhosh87

Welcome!

Hello, AbhijnanGhosh87, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  Pbritti (talk) 05:03, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank u AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 06:08, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. ~~~~ S Philbrick(Talk) 15:06, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Ossi kotov

requesting a ban on the user ossi kotov as this bot account is continuously changing the no of rafale in the indian air force requesting a reversal of his edit also and also a change in the no of rafale in the indian air force back to 36 2409:40F3:2C:A1BD:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 16:16, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Reversion

requesting reversion of operational rafale in indian air force back to 36 as a vandalism edit was made by an editor known as ossi kottov in the dassault rafale page. Rii12345 (talk) 18:57, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Request

reversion of number of rafale in indian air force, requesting for number of rafales in the indian air force to be reverted back to 36 as some miscreant has falsely changed the number. 117.213.49.41 (talk) 04:26, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 07:17, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

May 2025

Hello, I'm Swatjester. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Akash (missile), but the source cited did not support that content. It has been removed for now, but if you would like to include a citation that verifies the content and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. We take source misrepresentation very seriously on Wikipedia. Please take care not to do so again -- and additionally, please further refrain from uncivil comments such as accusing others of "falsely deleting" things and being "propaganda pushers." ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 07:17, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Sukhoi Su-30MKI, you may be blocked from editing. If you continue to engage in battleground editing behavior, you are going to be subjected to sanctions. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 07:21, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Got it, will remember. AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 14:59, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

can u help out , in S400 page ,Filmyboy is constantly updating fake information despite being reversed. AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 15:00, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

In regards to edits at IAF active military equipment:

Eurasian Times [63], unreliable per a February 2025 RfC.

According to WP:RS Eurasian times is unreliable. Your excuses of Reuters and Washingtonpost being unreliable despite a community consensus almost unanimously considering it as extremely reliable is completely unneeded. They are third party independent sources and that is all that matters.

If you revert the edit once more, I will have no choice but to escalate it to Wikipedia Administrators. Do not make this into an edit war. This will be your first warning. DarkPhantom23 (talk) 07:21, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Regarding Edit

I know what you have said, if you want you can escalate. I will not be editing it again. I didn't know about Pakistan community consensus , so made it. AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 05:57, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

BTW, your edit was again discarded by someone with more experience than me. AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 06:50, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Warning Issue

@DarkPhantom23 Please don't make unnecessary changes to any Aviation site before having confirmed unbiased references. If you do it again, I shall be forced to escalate the issue to the Wiki administrators. Consider this your 1st warning. AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 08:42, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

If you have bothered to read the talk page, this issue has already been sorted out.

You are not the person of contention. You have used a source which is prohibited via WP:RS and you expect me to accept that? Nice try.

I'd highly suggest for you to read WP:RS and WP:AGF before trying to make snarky comments about me. DarkPhantom23 (talk) 09:19, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

stop whining and beg IMF for more loans to support your economy. Get well soon. AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 06:53, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

I am not from Pakistan as you are implying.

This will be your first and last warning in regards to your ad hominem attacks. DarkPhantom23 (talk) 23:00, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Regarding ad hominem attacks, I took it personally, so I apologise for my conduct. About yhe warning part, I have been warned already by senior editors and I dont think I need it from you. Anyways, sorry again for the incident. AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 05:42, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

No problem, I hope we both learn from this experience, and continue our very best to make Wikipedia a factual place.

Happy editing AbhijnanGhosh87 DarkPhantom23 (talk) 17:29, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 10:46, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

May 2025

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for gross incivility and battleground conduct displayed in this edit in particular despite previous related warnings. If such conduct is repeated after your block expires, you are likely to be topic-banned from this highly contentious area or blocked indefinitely. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Abecedare (talk) 23:41, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AbhijnanGhosh87 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I tried to reverse some one sided posts without authentic evidences from my part. There are no official confirmations from any side about loses and various media outlets amplify the issue by fake reporting. If i have dome something wrong unknowingly, I apologise for my mistakes. Will keep in mind not to repeat them. Can you please revert my block? Thanks and Regards AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 13:55, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not address your grossly uncivil comment. If you are unable to edit about topics related to Pakistan without insulting Pakistan or editors from Pakistan(or you think are from there), you risk a topic ban from the contentious topic area of India/Pakistan/Afghanistan(see the above notice). I think 72 hours was very generous. 331dot (talk) 15:05, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please do not gravedance

(Non-administrator comment) Opening a new ANI thread about an editor who was literally just indefinitely blocked for attacks can be taken as WP:GRAVEDANCING. I've shut down the thread, and to avoid any possible future WP:BOOMERANGs and sanctions, please keep cool when editing gets hot. Thank you. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 15:01, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Ok got it, thank you. Will keep that in mind in the future. AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 15:04, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. ~~~~ S Philbrick(Talk) 11:53, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Got it, I shall keep it in my knowledge not to edit like this

Thanks and my apologies AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 12:02, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Mach Conversion

Hello @AbhijnanGhosh87:, I noticed that you updated the conversion between Mach number and km/h or mph speed on multiple aircraft articles. The problem is that your conversions are wrong. It looks like you are taking the Mach value at see level, which is incorrect if you want to convert the maximum speed at high altitude. As a general rule, unless it is properly sourced, we should never do those types of conversions because, without knowing exactly the altitude and air temperature, there is no way to do a proper conversion. In the meantime, I have reverted your changes. Hope this helps. --McSly (talk) 18:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

I got it , so sorry for the changes, will keep that in mind. Thank you for reverting. 116.193.129.208 (talk) 18:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for correcting me, will kerp this in mind in future, please ignore my novice mistake. AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 18:46, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

June 2025

Your edit to INS Arnala (P68) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Please never copy entire passages from other websites into Wikipedia. ~ Pbritti (talk) 06:30, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Will keep that in mind, sorry AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 06:32, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

You have an extensive history of copyright violations, with multiple blatant violations in the last week. This is despite previous warnings. Please provide a response explaining how you plan to avoid copyright violations going forward. Failure to do so will result in me taking this before the community, with a good likelihood that you may face a period where you are unable to add to articles. ~ Pbritti (talk) 06:35, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

I will be careful in the future. My only intention was to improve the articles. Coming to the INS ARNALA (P68) page, can I alter the words and add the citations for the same to avaoid copyright violation? AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 06:37, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

I reiterate again that I shall not be making any more changes to articles that don't comply with copyright guidelines of wikipedia. AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 06:38, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

You additions to articles seem to only be copy-and-pasting from other websites. That is unacceptable, as is copying-and-pasting and then swapping in new words in a few places. Please see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing for more information. ~ Pbritti (talk) 06:41, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Okay , thank you for your advice. Will do AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 06:42, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Regarding Agni-V edit, I never mentioned Kilometres as measure of speed, I am a doctor and do know the basic units of measurements. I had quoted a valid source, may I know the reason for deletion?

Thanks AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 18:12, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Suggestions for creating an article, List of Indian military radars

I was thinking of creating an article listing India's military grade radars (mostly developed by India's DRDO), on the lines of the rather recently created List of Indian military missiles and List of active Indian military aircraft. This was because of the fact that many of the radars India developed does not have its article yet and it is being confusing as to where the details of those radars be included.

For example, Details of Ashwini LLTR radar by LRDE was included in List of equipment of the Indian Army until recently (I removed it since the radar is for the IAF not IA), it has been included in IACCS and, interestingly, is also present in Projects of DRDO#Navy (which is incorrect and confusing and lists all DRDO radars irrespective of whether or not they were meant for the service's use).

Initially, I want to include India's indigenous radars only which can and will be expanded to include all of active military radars irrespective of their origin. This way we can also reduce the load on the Projects of DRDO#Radars section. I have also raised the matter with other users including Shashpant, Surabhi9191 and 4-RAZOR 01.

I am here to collect suggestions on the construction of the article and what certain categories to include there. Thanks, Aviator Jr (talk) 11:29, 7 July 2025 (UTC).

The page, List of Indian military radars, has been published. Aviator Jr (talk) 11:26, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Categories according to me roughly

□ Military Radar installations • IAF • IA • Indian Navy • Coast Guard

□ Civilian Aviation Radar installations

□ Future Developments

□ Service History

Excellent suggestion overall, I am in, let me know how you plan on doing it.

AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 14:21, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. As of now, I have a rough list of the radars (only military, not civilians). After I publish the article, you are free to add on civilian ones if you have the data. Aviator Jr (talk) 16:33, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Will research in the meantime AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 19:09, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

I have added counter ballistic radar in List of Indian military radars page. Can you add an image of the same as I am still to learn the technique. AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 19:48, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)