User talk:Aakashnavindu

Welcome!

Hi Aakashnavindu! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Sweetabena (talk) 08:52, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thilaka Kudahetty (December 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by QEnigma were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fail to meet WP:GNG on WP:NBIO, WP:NBASIC and WP:AUTHOR. Require WP:RS and WP:IS for WP:V.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thilaka Kudahetty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QEnigma (talk) 15:05, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Aakashnavindu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! QEnigma (talk) 15:05, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karwa (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lemonaka was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All based on a blog source, clearly unreliable one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karwa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Lemonaka 01:07, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karwa (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karwa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:32, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Anura Kumara Dissanayake of Sri Lanka.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anura Kumara Dissanayake of Sri Lanka.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Thilaka Kudahetty

Hello, Aakashnavindu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thilaka Kudahetty, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:08, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Karwa

Hello, Aakashnavindu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Karwa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:09, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Thilaka Kudahetty

Hello, Aakashnavindu. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Thilaka Kudahetty".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 15:28, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karwa (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gommeh was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Improvements have been made since this was last declined, but I'm still not satisfied with the reliability of some of the sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karwa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gommeh 🎮 20:53, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Karwa

Hello, Aakashnavindu. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Karwa".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 21:26, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

January 2026

Hello, I'm Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Battle for Dream Island, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diff: Special:Diff/1331687521. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 17:37, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello Aakashnavindu. Regarding the recent revert you made to Malkapur, Buldhana district: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. These warnings help other patrollers to know the past conduct of a vandal and help administrators when determining a course of action to take. I see your familiar with the tool Ultraviolet. Ultraviolet has the functionality to make warning users easy. Thank you for your contrubutions! - Otherwise (Talk?) 11:55, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Yes, I do normally use Ultraviolet warnings for vandals, thank you for the idea. Aakashnavindu (talk) 11:58, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

You may not be aware, but if you warn a vandal appropriately and they don't cease, you can report them to WP:AVI which can result in a block. This is one of the main advantages of warning. - Otherwise (Talk?) 12:03, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Aakashnavindu (talk) 12:05, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Your edits

Hi, I saw your recent edit on La Guarimba International Film Festival. I appreciate your edits, however in this one you used "it's" instead of "its". I've fixed it, but I'd suggest keeping an eye on your grammar. Keep up the good work! Awesomecat (✉ / ✎) 05:05, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, I will be more careful next time. Aakashnavindu (talk) 05:08, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Recent Changes Barnstar
		For faithfully patrolling recent changes, being nice to newcomers, and generally being helpful. Thank you! - Otherwise (Talk?) 07:18, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much! I appreciate it greatly, Aakashnavindu (talk) 07:24, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Of course! - Otherwise (Talk?) 07:26, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Start acknowledging all these edits instead of calling them disruptive. They are constructive, it is Israeli ionospheric machine since approximately 1998 causing each natural disasters globally

Start acknowledging all these edits instead of calling them disruptive. They are constructive, it is Israeli ionospheric machine since approximately 1998 causing each natural disasters globally ~2025-42549-36 (talk) 08:00, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

I apologise, The edits do appear to be disruptive, you have not provided any sources on the edit you have made. Please read wikipedia:reliable sources, and WP:FRINGE. If you have any other questions, reply to this message. Thank you! Aakashnavindu (talk) 08:09, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Jae Stephens edit

I made an edit on Jae Stephens artistry tab and it got reverted instantly under non constructive. It was constructive because it expanded on her artistry and I even had proper citation. ~2026-60826-9 (talk) 10:19, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

That was a mistake on my part, I saw the edit as highlighted 'too easily' which was added. Apologies for the confusion, I will reinstate your edit. Thanks for letting me know. ~~~~ Aakashnavindu (talk) 10:35, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:40, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Hello, I'm Steven (Editor). I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Auckland Grammar School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Steven (Editor) (talk) 16:33, 13 March 2026 (UTC)