User talk:1bisdak

Junie Yu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Junie Yu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 05:38, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Junie Yu (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Old-AgedKid was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

WP NPOL not allows him to be accepted

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Junie Yu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Old-AgedKid (talk) 09:33, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, 1bisdak! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Old-AgedKid (talk) 09:33, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Florencio Garay moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Florencio Garay. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Moriwen (talk) 02:53, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi 1bisdak. Thank you for your work on Amay Bisaya. Another editor, Royiswariii, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please add references on Filmography section if you can.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Royiswariii}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ROY is WAR Talk! 04:11, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

@Royiswariii: A recent update has been made. Thank you for reviewing my work :) 1bisdak (talk) 04:59, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Florencio Garay has been accepted

Florencio Garay, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 15:58, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

@Yoblyblob: Thank you! 1bisdak (talk) 02:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Junie Yu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Junie Yu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junie Yu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 08:53, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

June 2025

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Junie Yu, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Meters (talk) 20:57, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Frankly speaking, I don't trust those people who are opposing the article's existence. Their edits are useless if they already voted for deletion.

1bisdak (talk) 23:02, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi 1bisdak! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 00:08, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

People should use their common sense. I am not here to play around. 1bisdak (talk) 00:52, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junie Yu, you may be blocked from editing. Again, do not make multiple !votes on the same AFD. Stop doing this. We know that you want to keep it. !voting multiple times is not allowed, and will not help. Meters (talk) 01:45, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

People should use their common sense. Edits are useless if a vote for deletion has already occurred. Don't abuse the permission Wikipedia has granted you; it undermines Wikipedia's credibility. 1bisdak (talk) 02:12, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Borgenland (talk) 04:42, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! 1bisdak (talk) 04:59, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junie Yu. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Meters (talk) 22:31, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Bitcoin treasury companies moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bitcoin treasury companies. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text and sources cited are not WP:RS. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Alpha3031 (t • c) 08:30, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

June 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:16, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Email reply

Hello. If you wish to have the block reviewed, please follow the instructions above. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 14:23, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

I agree with the comment / reply by zzuuzz above. Follow the isnstructions given in the block notice. Multiple canvassing offsite by email for a block to be lifted is likely to be counter productive and contrary to the way Wikipedia operates. Cactus.man ✍ 19:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, @Zzuuzz and @Cactus.man. 1bisdak (talk) 21:59, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1bisdak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I am requesting a review of my indefinite block. I understand that I was blocked for inappropriate conduct surrounding AfD processes. I will now fully respect and adhere to all AfD policies and outcomes. 1bisdak (talk) 21:53, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not address the manner in which you conduct yourself here, which is the main concern. You also don't describe what edits you will make. 331dot (talk) 23:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1bisdak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I am requesting a review of my indefinite block. I understand that I was blocked for inappropriate conduct surrounding AfD processes, specifically for making insulting remarks and engaging in disruptive editing. I previously held the misguided belief that post-deletion-vote edits were futile—a contradictory mindset akin to contributing to an open-source project while aiming to delete its public repository. This belief led me to insult those who participated in the discussions, and I sincerely apologize for those actions.

I now understand that AfD is a crucial collaborative process focused on achieving consensus, and that respectful, civil engagement is paramount, regardless of the discussion's outcome. I commit to engaging constructively and adhering to all Wikipedia policies, particularly those on civility and dispute resolution, in all future contributions.

1bisdak (talk) 00:02, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unblock request appears to have been written by a chatbot using a large language model. The purpose of unblock requests is to determine whether you, the human operating this account, understand why you were blocked – not to test a chatbot's ability to tell us what we want to hear. A message written (or rewritten) by a chatbot can also cause you to sound like you're making empty promises. It is better to write the unblock request yourself. Please read through the guide to appealing blocks for more help. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:21, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your email

Unblock requests by email are rarely appropriate. You didn't even bother to explain why you were blocked or why it would be good for the encyclopedia if you were unblocked. Please read the Guide to appealing blocks carefully. Cullen328 (talk) 06:19, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

@Cullen328: I already have a pending unblock request. 1bisdak (talk) 09:03, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Amay Bisaya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amay Bisaya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amay Bisaya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lenticel ^(talk) 00:57, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Pangangan Island for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pangangan Island is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pangangan Island until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lenticel ^(talk) 00:59, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1bisdak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I am requesting a review of my indefinite block. I understand that I was blocked due to inappropriate conduct related to the AfD process. My belief that post-deletion-vote edits were futile—a contradictory mindset, comparable to contributing to an open-source project while advocating for the deletion of its public repository (e.g., Git)—led me to insult those involved in the discussions.

Going forward, I will refrain from inappropriate engagement with those I perceive as inexperienced in collaborative projects, so that I can continue editing on my target topics. I sincerely apologize for my past behavior.

Decline reason:

Looking at the ANI thread your unblock request doesn't address all your problematic conduct. PhilKnight (talk) 04:29, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1bisdak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

It's hard to show the difference in me unless you unblock me.

Decline reason:

You are clearly just wasting our and your time here. Enough. Yamla (talk) 10:53, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked because an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

Concern regarding Draft:Bitcoin treasury companies

Hello, 1bisdak. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bitcoin treasury companies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bitcoin treasury companies

Hello, 1bisdak. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bitcoin treasury companies".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:23, 27 December 2025 (UTC)