Jump to content

User:TexasAndroid

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Computer programmer from San Antonio, Texas.

Reverter of vandalism, and wiki-link cleaner. (I'm no great author of Wiki pages, but I'm good at cleaning up other people's messes. :))

My barnstar collection is here.

Current Projects


Icon This user has been on Wikipedia for 21 years, 5 months and 28 days.
enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.
This user is a member of the
Counter-Vandalism Unit.
This editor is a WikiGnome.
♂This user is male.
This user participates in
WikiProject Categories
to improve Wikipedia categorization.
This user has created a global account.
(-o-) This user plays the Pokémon RPGs and other related video games.
719 This user has owned 719 species of Pokémon in Pokémon X.
This user uses Google Maps.
This editor is a
Master Editor IV
and is entitled to display this
Orichalcum Editor Star.

100k+

Current Outstanding admin load

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requestsEntries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages0
Wikipedians looking for help0
Requests for unblock106
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests59
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests147
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests5
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests2
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests1641
Requested RD1 redactions0
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations1
Candidates for speedy deletion23
Open sockpuppet investigations88
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog


Reports


User-reported

Candidates for speedy deletionEntries
Attack pages0
Copyright violations1
Hoaxes0
Vandalism0
User requested2
Empty articles0
Nonsense pages0
Spam pages1
LLM pages0
Importance or significance not asserted0
Possibly contested candidates12
Other candidates20
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 11 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 148 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently

Requested RD1 redactions – No backlog currently

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

    Requests for page protection


    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level
    Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Reason: Long-term target of vandalism. It returned. ~2026-60644-62 (talk) 18:23, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. tony 17:03, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Extended confirmed protection: WP:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict – Article about a protest of the war in gaza. - Otherwise (Antibacklog Aktion!) (talk?) 01:46, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – High profile event, lots of details to come, take to talk page. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 05:21, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. tony 17:04, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Reason: Requesting semi-protection: High number of people making misplaced reports that often contain PII or accusations. Precedent for semi-protecting under these circumstances exists. Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:23, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Reason: Semi protection - Addition of no-public personal information (WP:BLPCRIME violation regrading a minor) by temporary account User from Serbia (talk) 09:38, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring. Cheese240 (talk) 10:29, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Reason: Again, high level of vandalism. As soon as the article is unprotected, the IPs do the same edit over and over. It's like the third time I ask for protection HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:54, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Mostly from an IP user ꕥ 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 ꕥ →𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎← 10:54, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Relentless childish vandalism from a TA-hopper and long prot log; see edit history for details. Blake Gripling (talk) 11:14, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Reason: **Request for Page Protection: Painda Khel**

    I would like to request semi-protection for the Wikipedia article **[Painda Khel](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Painda_Khel)**.

    This article contains historical and genealogical information about the Painda Khel clan, its association with the Tanoli tribe, and its historical background in the Hazara region of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

    Since the article covers specific historical and genealogical information, I believe it is important to maintain its accuracy, reliability, and consistency.

    I respectfully request that an administrator review the article and consider applying semi-protection to reduce the risk of unconstructive edits, vandalism, or the addition of unsupported information.

    I understand that Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia and that legitimate improvements by other editors should remain possible. My intention is not to claim ownership of the article, but to help preserve the accuracy and quality of its content.

    Thank you for your consideration.

    ~2026-60460-61 (talk) 11:38, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Note to admins: This request, containing Markdown, is AI-generated. Theeverywhereperson talk here In solidarity! 15:24, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
    Not only that, but it could be declined as a request for pre-emptive protection. Theeverywhereperson talk here In solidarity! 15:24, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Reason: Recent vandalizing by numerous temporary accounts; possible sockpuppetry. HelloIAmLucas (talk) 11:39, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Indefinite semi-protection: User request within own user space. Not going to be on the account a lot, and therefore cannot check for vandalism. Requesting this just as a safe measure. If this gets declined, could you at least do pending changes protection? Larawag✦ (talk) 13:05, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Socking of Salebot1. Beyhive Navy (talk) 13:08, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Declined as stale. It looks like they've moved on. Re-request if they start making edits to the article again. tony 17:13, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Penn65 (talk|cont) 13:52, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Penn65 (talk|cont) 13:52, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, with multiple WP:NOTAFORUM violations. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 14:28, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – repeated disruptive reversions by sockpuppet accounts. Trabzonluyuz-rumuz-elhamdulillah (talk) 15:16, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. tony 17:33, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tevu 28th. In solidarity, Jalen Barks (Woof) 15:40, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    User(s) blocked. IP also blocked. tony 17:22, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Reason: Temporary semi-protection requested. On November 13, a temporary account restored a section that was removed, without an edit summary. The same account made another substantial addition on November 14, which another editor removed as out of scope. There were also several edits by temporary accounts with no explanatory summary early on November 15, which were later reverted. Dragonspark (talk) 16:16, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – might wanna go longer since this page was protected in the past and the socks have returned. -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 17:00, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    In addition also semi Draper, Utah for the same reason. -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 17:00, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption. Block evasion. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:24, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Reason: The previously temporary account vandal returned despite the IP ban, now under Lunive3890 name. Smeagol 17 (talk) 17:28, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of AI slop by TA who is hopping between IPs. msk 17:53, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Reason: IP vandalised the article, now his red link is doing the same with his single purpose account. The same attack happened here, which is protected now: Hunyadi family I think this article need a permanent protection against not autoconfirmed editors. This is an obsessed topic, even in real life https://hungarytoday.hu/romanian-citizen-removes-flag-from-hungarian-monument-in-belgrade/ OrionNimrod (talk) 18:00, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The cross-Wiki LTA in question has recently discovered this page and has made multiple edits to it. They have been active since at least late 2025, and are unlikely to stop. Temporary protection is unlikely to help. Meters (talk) 18:06, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Extended confirmed–protected indefinitely. Mfield (Oi!) 18:13, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict. Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 18:12, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Just to add on, the talk page says it is ECP, but it isn't.
    Cheers. Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 18:14, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced content by TAs. 10mmsocket (talk) 18:23, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Reason: Potential vandalism or unauthorized appropriation by individuals affiliated with major AI technology companies. Mickwellington (talk) 18:26, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level

    Unprotection: 12 years protected, deceased admin, did have some prior protections but I think this is okay for trial. dualcerbtalk 15:21, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

    Question: In the instructions at the top of this page it states "DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details". So could you expand as to why you believe the protection should be removed other than the duration of the protection? Ponyobons mots 19:45, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
    Pending changes–protected. Borderline, averaging 500 views per day, and no valid rationale has been provided for unprotection. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 17:59, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Unprotection: 14 years protected, no prior protections, deceased admin, trial unprotection should work. dualcerbtalk 15:21, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

    Question: In the instructions at the top of this page it states "DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details". So could you expand as to why you believe the protection should be removed other than the duration of the protection? Ponyobons mots 19:46, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
    Pending changes–protected. Borderline, ~500 views per day, and no valid rationale has been provided for unprotection. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 18:00, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Unprotection: TWAFI in 2 weeks which is also semi protected, the protection log isn’t that long and it has been protected for a while. Per the discussion on Garbage, I am going to file an unprotection request for this article too. dualcerbtalk 03:12, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    I would like admins to note this entry in the protection log of this article:

    21:08, 15 April 2013 Tariqabjotu talk removed protection from Hammer (removing protection as among TAFI on Main Page) (hist) (thank)

    It goes without saying, but the protection should be set to expire in two weeks for the same reasons as § Garbage. FaviFake (talk) 03:23, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
    Unprotected to test the waters. If excessive vandalism resumes, I trust that this article will be re-evaluated as a WP:AFI candidate. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 17:54, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit be made to a protected page


    Please update the worldwide gross collection of Ramayana: Part One (2026) to ₹1033.55 crore.

    Source: https://www.sacnilk.com/quicknews/ramayana_part_1_2026_Box_Office_Collection_Day_8

    The source reports an India gross of ₹675.05 crore and an overseas gross of ₹358.50 crore, bringing the worldwide gross to ₹1033.55 crore. Chandreshkhare34 (talk) 18:36, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

    Link the article List of Zanjeerain characters in the Filmography section and the title Zanjeerain than the Role of Rabiya. Link Rabiya with List of Zanjeerain characters. Thanks Trubres (talk) 21:58, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

    Protected edit requests

    3 protected edit requests
    Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
    Module:Message box/ambox.css (request) 2026-11-12 05:01 Cascade-protected from Main Page (log) Modified by KrakatoaKatie on 2016-11-16: "restore"
    Module:Message box/tmbox.css (request) 2026-11-12 05:01 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
    MediaWiki:Watchlist-messages (request) 2026-11-13 01:28 MediaWiki page (log) Unprotected by Cyberpower678 on 2018-11-20: "Breaks the RfX bot."
    Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:57, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
    5 template-protected edit requests
    Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
    Template:Infobox football biography (request) 2026-09-23 18:48 Template-protected (log) Protected by Mike V on 2014-03-01: "Highly visible page: restoring protection"
    Template:Infobox military installation (request) 2026-10-11 21:22 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
    Template:Infobox AFL biography (request) 2026-10-28 23:07 Template-protected (log) Modified by Samsara on 2017-01-14: "Highly visible template: via RfPP (almost 13k transclusions now)"
    Template:Cite certification (request) 2026-11-12 23:28 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2020-08-29: "High-risk template"
    Template:Category link without namespace (request) 2026-11-15 13:37 Template-protected (log) From Template:C: Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
    Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:20, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    WP:RFA

    Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
    No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

    WP:PERM

    Requests for autopatrolled

    Autopatrolled

    I have been editing since May last year and have created more than 25 articles. Two of them are rated B‑class, and most of the others are C‑class or Start‑class. Two of my articles, Presley Gerber and Killing of Sonia Exelby, were nominated for deletion because of differing views on their notability, but both were kept. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ItsShandog (talk • contribs) 11:59, 22 October 2026 (UTC)

    Hi @ItsShandog, could you explain how you created Brendan MegrawBrendan Megraw in Diff/1290863082? Why did you use the {{navbox}} template in Diff/1290872406 and how did you produce that in such a short amount of time? Why did you remove the {{ai-generated}} tag (added in Diff/1348062842), along with utm_source=chatgpt.com parameters, in Diff/1348070103 and then restore the original redirect in Diff/1379884757 a couple of months later? ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:59, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
    That would have been around the time I was new to Wikipedia from what I can recall, and looking at it now, it was days after I joined when I would have used ChatGPT. That was before I knew much about AI or about Wikipedia. I stopped using it a long time ago, as I saw how unreliable it was even before the ban on Wikipedia. I cannot explain the navbox, as I have no idea what that is. I would assume it was something to do with ChatGPT at that time. In regard to restoring it to a redirect, that was more to do with the fact that I was editing the disappeared page that covers all those people, and the page more or less repeats the same thing. It does not have any more information than the disappeared page. It was not anything to do with my old edits, as I did not even notice the ChatGPT bit on it. I forgot about that edit, as it was over a year ago. If I had remembered, I would have gone back and fixed all of that, but it is better as a redirect anyway. ItsShandog (talk) 15:17, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
    The reason for the removal of the AI part was that this was at the point when I did not use it anymore, but I had not fixed the page at that stage, so I should not have removed it. That was my own fault. There were so many pages I would have edited when I was new that I could not remember them all, but any I come across now I try to fix. I probably removed the ChatGPT part because I would have assumed that was what the template was referring to. That would have been me trying to fix the page, but to be honest I did not know the ins and outs of AI until recently, or all the different ways it is incorrect. Even back in April I just assumed a page was tagged with that because it had old links from ChatGPT and that type of thing. It is only when I have started to read the AI signs page on Wikipedia that I have learned about all the different things it does. If I had known that in April, I would have done a lot of copyediting and fixing of that page. ItsShandog (talk) 15:21, 24 October 2026 (UTC)

    I am requesting the autopatrolled permission for my account.

    My account was created in January 2019, and I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia since then, with over 14,900 edits to date. I have created more than 38 articles, along with numerous redirects in the mainspace. Most of my articles have successfully passed New Page Patrol without any significant issues.

    My contributions primarily focus on Indian cinema and biographical topics, particularly under WikiProject India. I have consistently tried to follow Wikipedia's content policies and article creation guidelines while creating and improving articles.

    Given my editing history and experience with article creation, I believe I have demonstrated a good understanding of Wikipedia's standards. I would appreciate it if my account could be considered for the autopatrolled permission, as it would help reduce the workload for New Page Patrol volunteers. Needforname (talk) 15:48, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

    Thanks for applying, @Needforname. Did you use an LLM-based tool to write the request above or this post at RSN? Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:08, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
    Thanks for asking, @Dclemens1971. I used an LLM to polish the my autopatrolled request, but editing history, article creation and other details mentioned are my own. The request reflects my actual contributions and intentions. Needforname (talk) 16:21, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
    I think you used the LLM to do more than "polish" your request. The English fluency is significantly different than what you have previously produced. Many of your most recent plot summaries do not use understandable English. Examples: Bholi contest for election by with support of water mafia. Hunny hatch plan made Choocha to contest opposite Bholi and because of Choocha innocence get massive support of folks. Bholi made plan and Fukras to South Africa for Choocha's deja-chu but they got another gift (Fukrey (film series)); Shiva is getting arranged married with Vidhya. During reception, night before the marriage ceremony, Anu arrived and secretly proposed Shiva on stage. Anu and Shiva are working together for last 5 years, Anu continuously Shiva's proposal and now she is asking to marry her. Vidhya has big dream's with Shiva. Now Shiva in dilemma, who to marry. Same night, in same place, others also various dilemma, about their love. (Shubhamangala (2022 film)).
    Doing a scan through your recent creations, I also see Dr. Arora's plot summary is cut off mid-sentence, and the episode list is uncited. Finally, as is common with LLM-generated prose, your request doesn't demonstrate understanding of the purpose of autopatrolled. You haven't created an article in more than two years, so autopatrolled would not be of value to reducing the backlog of new pages. And we cannot have an editor who is using LLMs in this way editing without patroller scrutiny.  Not done. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:31, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
    This user has created more than 2,000 articles and it would save partollers time by not having to review articles by this user. In solidarity, Dafootballguy (Want to talk?) 19:22, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
    Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

    AutoWikiBrowser

    I would like to have access in order to perform batch updates of outdated locator maps. Excommunicato (talk) 19:51, 10 November 2026 (UTC)

     Done * Pppery * it has begun... 18:29, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
    Requests for confirmation

    Confirmed

    Requesting confirmed so the bot does not set off edit filters for editing userpages as a new editor and blanking userpages as a new editor. The reason we don't have the bot permmision is we have not been accpted by the community yet because we are only operating in Larawag (my) userspace, so therefore, I have not applied. LarawagArchiveBot (talk) 12:56, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
    Requests for extended confirmation

    Extended confirmed

    Hello, Fellow Wikipedians!

    After User:Strongshorts suggested that I request for Extended Confirmed permissions, I decided to request again after my previous request was declined!

    Again, I have familiarised myself with WP:GAME as well as WP:EXTENDEDCONFIRMED.

    I will promise not to game the system ever again.

    Happy editing and best wishes, Zahrazamedahmedi 💬My Talk Page💬 🫗My Mistakes🫗 05:12, 8 November 2026 (UTC)

    Automated comment This user has had 1 request for extended confirmed declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot talk 05:20, 8 November 2026 (UTC)
    Hello again, Fellow Wikipedians and Admins!
    Along the way, I have been fighting vandalism with RedWarn, adding categories to articles with HotCat, editing short descriptions with ShortDesc Helper, and also using Suggestion Mode too!
    Happy editing! Zahrazamedahmedi 💬My Talk Page💬 🫗My Mistakes🫗 23:42, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
     Not done Your recent history contains far too many examples of careless and hasty editing, such as frequently reverting editing without first adequately checking article history to determine whether the editing is valid. JBW (talk) 14:45, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Could I have my extended-confirmed status restored? It's been more than 30 days, and I've put in more than 500 major edits.

    I lost my status because I gamed the system by inserting wikilinks to increase my edit count. Nearly a year ago, I thought this would be a good way to avoid violating protections put on pages related to WP:PIA. I had not read all the rules surrounding protected topics, and I learned, notice by notice, how much I had to steer clear of those topics.

    I think I have had a clean record since having my status revoked. Though I've gotten into some extended discussions on talk pages, my edits by and large have not been reverted nor my editing style labelled as disruptive.

    I was going to wait until the one year anniversary of my status being revoked, but I was just pinged in a discussion on a page I can't edit. It was also by an editor I've historically disagreed with, which I take to be a good sign that I haven't ruffled too many feathers on Wikipedia.

    Thanks for your consideration! Dauntbares (talk) 16:24, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

    ScottishFinnishRadish, any objections? Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:32, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
    None on my end. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:50, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
     Done * Pppery * it has begun... 18:34, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

    Could you apply EC rights to my alt account User:Equivalent-Text2598 (alt) as I have TAIV and AWB rights so am aware of the damage a comprimised account could cause.

    Cheers. Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 17:29, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

    Already done (automated response): This user already has the "extendedconfirmed" user right. — MusikBot talk 17:30, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
    Hi just for an admin, I requested this for an alt account and as such thought this might be the best way to proove the ownership of this account. Cheers. Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 17:31, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
     Done * Pppery * it has begun... 18:36, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
    There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.

    Event coordinator

    Requests for file mover

    File mover

    Reason for requesting file mover rights is to fix minor mistakes made when uploading. I upload many files pertaining to history and astronomy, and sometimes make a mistake in the title I do not notice until the file is uploaded (for example; wrong date, typo). It simplifies the process of fixing said errors if I can do it myself. Minnastronomer (talk) 04:36, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

     Not done Two uploads on enwiki total, both of which were deleted. Did you mean to request this on Commons instead? * Pppery * it has begun... 18:37, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
    There are no outstanding requests for the mass message sender flag.

    Mass message sender

    Requests for new page reviewer

    New page reviewer

    I would like to help reduce the backlog of unreviewed new pages. I have experience participating in XFD, AfC reviewing, and creating/expanding articles, including promoting 1 good article. I believe that I meet the general criteria for NPR. EvanTech10 (talk, contribs) ⚡ 01:24, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

     Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 16:43, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

    Previously had the rights which were revoked for inactivity. Would like to help with the backlog, particularly reviewing new redirects. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 21:40, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

     Done, welcome back. signed, Rosguill talk 16:44, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

    I am requesting new page reviewer rights to assist with the backlog and identify obvious spam and attack pages. I have experience in AfC and some in XFD. BlueStaticHorse (talk🌸) 13:26, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

    Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot talk 13:30, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

    Hi! I've had limited time over the last three weeks, but reviewing was interesting work and I'd like to renew my patrolling rights. Thank you! E mln e (talk) 12:00, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

    Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 20 November 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 12:00, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
    Requests for page mover

    Page mover

    Previously had page mover rights which expired due to inactivity. Would like them again to carry out technical requests and close page moves. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 20:49, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

     Done * Pppery * it has begun... 18:30, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

    Reason: I actively maintain and standardize article titles across international sports, tournament documentation, and New Page Patrol, and I regularly hit technical limitations that require waiting on WP:RM/TR or tagging redirects for speedy deletion. Specifically, I need the Page mover right to:

    Revert unexplained or undiscussed moves where the original title is blocked by a redirect (using round-robin swaps).

    Suppress (R2) cross-namespace redirects directly when draftifying premature mainspace articles, rather than having to tag every leftover redirect with {{db-r2}}.

    Suppress implausible typo/formatting redirects (R3) when correcting capitalization, diacritics, or naming convention errors (WP:COMMONNAME / WP:CONCISE).

    Clean up cut-and-paste moves and move multi-part templates or tournament pages together with their subpages (/doc, /sandbox, sub-events).

    I understand WP:R#DELETE and will preserve redirects whenever a title is a plausible search term, former name, or has incoming links. Ravana TALK 09:24, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

    Automated comment This user has had 1 request for page mover declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot talk 09:30, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
    I had a quick look and only saw one edit at WP:RM/TR since your last request for this permission back in August (8 edits in total to that page), and that was only a few days ago to move an article out of draftspace. Plus not a lot of page moves generally. You mentioned New Page Patrol but you don't have that permission. I'm not seeing much activity at RM either. I didn't check how often you were tagging for speedy deletion. I'm inclined to give the same advice you received last time you requested this permission. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:08, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
     Not done I just realised this is seemingly your 3rd request for this permission since the start of August this year, and I'm not seeing that you're built up a sufficient need for it since then. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:11, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
    Requests for pending changes reviewer

    Pending changes reviewer

    I wish to get more involved in helping Wikipedia. I meet the criteria, have reviewed applicable guidelines and policies and understand (through reading and some experience) the basic principles governing Wikipedia (WP:NOR, WP:BLP, WP:NPOV,WP:VERIF) and the fundamental WP:!. I am very keen to improve Wikipedia in any way I can. Quince&Medlar (talk) 11:10, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
    Requests for rollback

    Rollback

    Hello! I submitted a request for this right not too long ago, It was denied because I didn't yet have enough experience, But, I have largely improved over time and have almost 700 edits and a large track record of removing vandalism. I'm requesting this right because I'm wanting access to AntiVandal and just better tools in general. I also have a very good track record for notifying editors when reverting their edits. I have no history of edit warring. And I believe I meet all requirements to be given this permission. Thank You, 208𝑦𝒆𝑎𝒉ℎ (talk) 01:12, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

    Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot talk 01:20, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

    I am requesting rollback rights for access to anti-vandalism tools such as CVPI and AbuseReview. I have plenty of experience patrolling RTRC, patrolling Special:AbuseLog, and warning editors after reverting their edits. Szxq (talk) 22:18, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

     Done * Pppery * it has begun... 18:33, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

    I have been patrolling changes for over a year as well as participating at ANI, SPI & AINB... This right could be useful to me especially for WP:SOCKREVERTing.. Vestrian24Bio 07:31, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

     Done * Pppery * it has begun... 18:33, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
    Requests for temporary account IP viewer

    Temporary account IP viewer

    I work in counter-vandalism, Articles for Creation, and, more recently, the AI noticeboard. I belive that TAIV permissions are required because in Articles for Creation and AI cleanup, it would be useful to see if TAs are block evading or have used LLMs in the past (for cleanup reasons and for linking cleanup cases at the AINB). For counter-vandalism, it would be useful simply for reporting socks and confirming if possibly connected TAs are connected. BlueStaticHorse (talk🌸) 15:04, 11 November 2026 (UTC)

     Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:09, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

    I would like to be a temporary account IP viewer. As you can see from my recent edit history, I have been involved in counter-vandalism, and I have initiated sockpuppet investigations. IGAEB (talk) 01:24, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

    It has been suggested to me that I request this right in order to save time on filing SPIs since I've been involved in many SPIs now (usually with the same users using different socks). Raskuly 🐰 14:49, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

     Done Fathoms Below (talk) 18:22, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

    Immediate requests

    CategoryEntries
    Wikipedians looking for help0
    Requests for unblock110
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages0
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations1
    Candidates for speedy deletion24
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests2

    Deletion

    CategoryEntries
    Articles for deletion654
    Templates for deletion39
    Categories for deletion492
    Wikipedia files for discussion113
    All redirects for discussion449
    Miscellaneous pages for deletion8
    Possible copyright violations11
    All articles proposed for deletion462
    All files proposed for deletion27
    Unsorted AfD debates1
    All files with the same name on Commons148
    CategoryEntries
    Orphaned non-free use443
    Unknown copyright status24
    Unknown source14
    No non-free use rationale0
    Replaceable non-free use images12
    Disputed non-free use images8

    Page protection

    CategoryEntries
    Protected10
    Semi-protected user and user talk pages1,404
    Fully protected user and user talk pages748
    Protected against vandalism3
    Protected talk pages of blocked users34
    Semi-protected2,181
    Arbitration 500/30 restricted0

    Cleanup

    General cleanup

    CategoryEntriesPercentage
    All pages needing cleanup33,5740.46
    All articles needing rewrite6,5590.09
    All articles needing expert attention1,4880.02
    All Wikipedia articles in need of updating46,0210.63

    Reference problems

    CategoryEntriesPercentage
    All pages needing factual verification13,7610.19
    All articles with unsourced statements588,5008.1
    All articles lacking sources27,6810.38
    All unreferenced BLPs10
    All articles needing additional references547,7217.54
    All articles needing references cleanup6,1760.09
    All articles lacking in-text citations111,0451.53
    All articles with dead external links365,1265.03

    Image cleanup problems

    CategoryEntriesPercentage
    Image files for cleanup17-
    Wikipedia files lacking a description151-
    Wikipedia files with unknown source11-

    Other problems

    CategoryEntriesPercentage
    All articles proposed for merging2500
    All articles proposed for splitting8850.01
    Unsorted Stubs0-
    Stub categories21,766-
    All uncategorized pages2930
    All orphaned articles52,7470.73
    All articles needing copy edit1,4890.02
    All articles with style issues20,7080.29
    All Wikipedia articles needing context2,6370.04
    All articles that may contain original research17,3140.24


    Miscellaneous

    CategoryEntries
    Requested moves493
    All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes2,208
    All accuracy disputes15,748
    Articles with invalid ISBNs1
    Articles with invalid ISSNs4
    All articles to be expanded52,597

    Special pages

    Maintenance reports Information
    Broken redirects
    Dead-end pages Dead-end pages
    Dormant pages Dusty articles
    DoubleRedirects Double redirects
    Lonely pages Orphaned articles
    Long pages
    New pages New page patrol
    New pages feed Page curation
    Protected pages Protection policy
    Short pages
    Uncategorized Categorization
    Uncategorized cats
    Uncategorized templates
    Unused categories
    Unused files (images)
    Unused templates
    Without interwiki links
    Most interwiki links