User:TexasAndroid
Computer programmer from San Antonio, Texas.
Reverter of vandalism, and wiki-link cleaner. (I'm no great author of Wiki pages, but I'm good at cleaning up other people's messes. :))
Current Projects
| en | This user is a native speaker of the English language. |
| This user is a member of the Counter-Vandalism Unit. |
| This user lives in the U.S. State of Texas. |
| This user is male. |
| This user participates in WikiProject Categories to improve Wikipedia categorization. |
| This user has created a global account. |
| This user plays the Pokémon RPGs and other related video games. |
| This user uses Google Maps. |
| This editor is a Master Editor IV and is entitled to display this Orichalcum Editor Star. |
| 100k+ |
Current Outstanding admin load
Administrative backlog
Reports
- ~2026-60196-73 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 139 (Fixed position vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:54, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-60588-59 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:17, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
User-reported
- ~2026-60192-82 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. NarutoSan6000 (talk) 17:12, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
- Twatsadooye (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Willem DeVitteo Smertino (use wave browser) (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- SchoolFan50 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- ThatAutisticBeastar (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "autism" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:50, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Note on file Do be aware that some users who use this string may genuinely be autistic - please be careful and make sure you are dealing with a vandal/LTA first -- DQB (owner / report) 03:50, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
- LarawagArchiveBot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- BDPHPFAMILY (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Jinofobama (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:40, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:40, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 15:40, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
- GabrieldoGamesDeveloper (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "(admin|coordinator|bureaucrat|check *user|developer|moderator|oversight|steward|sysop|committee|staff)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:00, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Note on file Name may imply a position of authority -- DQB (owner / report) 16:00, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
User-reported
| This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Reason: Long-term target of vandalism. It returned. ~2026-60644-62 (talk) 18:23, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: WP:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict – Article about a protest of the war in gaza. - Otherwise (Antibacklog Aktion!) (talk?) 01:46, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – High profile event, lots of details to come, take to talk page. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 05:21, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting semi-protection: High number of people making misplaced reports that often contain PII or accusations. Precedent for semi-protecting under these circumstances exists. Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:23, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Semi protection - Addition of no-public personal information (WP:BLPCRIME violation regrading a minor) by temporary account User from Serbia (talk) 09:38, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring. Cheese240 (talk) 10:29, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Again, high level of vandalism. As soon as the article is unprotected, the IPs do the same edit over and over. It's like the third time I ask for protection HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:54, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Mostly from an IP user ꕥ 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 ꕥ →𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎← 10:54, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Relentless childish vandalism from a TA-hopper and long prot log; see edit history for details. Blake Gripling (talk) 11:14, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Reason: **Request for Page Protection: Painda Khel**
I would like to request semi-protection for the Wikipedia article **[Painda Khel](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Painda_Khel)**.
This article contains historical and genealogical information about the Painda Khel clan, its association with the Tanoli tribe, and its historical background in the Hazara region of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Since the article covers specific historical and genealogical information, I believe it is important to maintain its accuracy, reliability, and consistency.
I respectfully request that an administrator review the article and consider applying semi-protection to reduce the risk of unconstructive edits, vandalism, or the addition of unsupported information.
I understand that Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia and that legitimate improvements by other editors should remain possible. My intention is not to claim ownership of the article, but to help preserve the accuracy and quality of its content.
Thank you for your consideration.
~2026-60460-61 (talk) 11:38, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
- Note to admins: This request, containing Markdown, is AI-generated. Theeverywhereperson talk here In solidarity! 15:24, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
- Not only that, but it could be declined as a request for pre-emptive protection. Theeverywhereperson talk here In solidarity! 15:24, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Recent vandalizing by numerous temporary accounts; possible sockpuppetry. HelloIAmLucas (talk) 11:39, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: User request within own user space. Not going to be on the account a lot, and therefore cannot check for vandalism. Requesting this just as a safe measure. If this gets declined, could you at least do pending changes protection? Larawag✦ (talk) 13:05, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Socking of Salebot1. Beyhive Navy (talk) 13:08, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Declined as stale. It looks like they've moved on. Re-request if they start making edits to the article again. tony 17:13, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Penn65 (talk|cont) 13:52, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Penn65 (talk|cont) 13:52, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, with multiple WP:NOTAFORUM violations. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 14:28, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – repeated disruptive reversions by sockpuppet accounts. Trabzonluyuz-rumuz-elhamdulillah (talk) 15:16, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. tony 17:33, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tevu 28th. In solidarity, Jalen Barks (Woof) 15:40, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection requested. On November 13, a temporary account restored a section that was removed, without an edit summary. The same account made another substantial addition on November 14, which another editor removed as out of scope. There were also several edits by temporary accounts with no explanatory summary early on November 15, which were later reverted. Dragonspark (talk) 16:16, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – might wanna go longer since this page was protected in the past and the socks have returned. -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 17:00, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
- In addition also semi Draper, Utah for the same reason. -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 17:00, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption. Block evasion. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:24, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Reason: The previously temporary account vandal returned despite the IP ban, now under Lunive3890 name. Smeagol 17 (talk) 17:28, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of AI slop by TA who is hopping between IPs. msk 17:53, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalised the article, now his red link is doing the same with his single purpose account. The same attack happened here, which is protected now: Hunyadi family I think this article need a permanent protection against not autoconfirmed editors. This is an obsessed topic, even in real life https://hungarytoday.hu/romanian-citizen-removes-flag-from-hungarian-monument-in-belgrade/ OrionNimrod (talk) 18:00, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The cross-Wiki LTA in question has recently discovered this page and has made multiple edits to it. They have been active since at least late 2025, and are unlikely to stop. Temporary protection is unlikely to help. Meters (talk) 18:06, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Extended confirmed–protected indefinitely. Mfield (Oi!) 18:13, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict. Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 18:12, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
- Just to add on, the talk page says it is ECP, but it isn't. Cheers. Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 18:14, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced content by TAs. 10mmsocket (talk) 18:23, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Potential vandalism or unauthorized appropriation by individuals affiliated with major AI technology companies. Mickwellington (talk) 18:26, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Unprotection: 12 years protected, deceased admin, did have some prior protections but I think this is okay for trial. dualcerbtalk 15:21, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
Question: In the instructions at the top of this page it states "DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details". So could you expand as to why you believe the protection should be removed other than the duration of the protection? Ponyobons mots 19:45, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
Pending changes–protected. Borderline, averaging 500 views per day, and no valid rationale has been provided for unprotection. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 17:59, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Unprotection: 14 years protected, no prior protections, deceased admin, trial unprotection should work. dualcerbtalk 15:21, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
Question: In the instructions at the top of this page it states "DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details". So could you expand as to why you believe the protection should be removed other than the duration of the protection? Ponyobons mots 19:46, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
Pending changes–protected. Borderline, ~500 views per day, and no valid rationale has been provided for unprotection. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 18:00, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Unprotection: TWAFI in 2 weeks which is also semi protected, the protection log isn’t that long and it has been protected for a while. Per the discussion on Garbage, I am going to file an unprotection request for this article too. dualcerbtalk 03:12, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
- I would like admins to note this entry in the protection log of this article:
It goes without saying, but the protection should be set to expire in two weeks for the same reasons as § Garbage. FaviFake (talk) 03:23, 15 November 2026 (UTC)21:08, 15 April 2013 Tariqabjotu talk removed protection from Hammer (removing protection as among TAFI on Main Page) (hist) (thank)
Unprotected to test the waters. If excessive vandalism resumes, I trust that this article will be re-evaluated as a WP:AFI candidate. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 17:54, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please update the worldwide gross collection of Ramayana: Part One (2026) to ₹1033.55 crore.
Source: https://www.sacnilk.com/quicknews/ramayana_part_1_2026_Box_Office_Collection_Day_8
The source reports an India gross of ₹675.05 crore and an overseas gross of ₹358.50 crore, bringing the worldwide gross to ₹1033.55 crore. Chandreshkhare34 (talk) 18:36, 12 November 2026 (UTC)
Link the article List of Zanjeerain characters in the Filmography section and the title Zanjeerain than the Role of Rabiya. Link Rabiya with List of Zanjeerain characters. Thanks Trubres (talk) 21:58, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:57, 15 November 2026 (UTC) |
| 5 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:20, 15 November 2026 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
|||||||||||
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
I have been editing since May last year and have created more than 25 articles. Two of them are rated B‑class, and most of the others are C‑class or Start‑class. Two of my articles, Presley Gerber and Killing of Sonia Exelby, were nominated for deletion because of differing views on their notability, but both were kept. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ItsShandog (talk • contribs) 11:59, 22 October 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting the autopatrolled permission for my account. My account was created in January 2019, and I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia since then, with over 14,900 edits to date. I have created more than 38 articles, along with numerous redirects in the mainspace. Most of my articles have successfully passed New Page Patrol without any significant issues. My contributions primarily focus on Indian cinema and biographical topics, particularly under WikiProject India. I have consistently tried to follow Wikipedia's content policies and article creation guidelines while creating and improving articles. Given my editing history and experience with article creation, I believe I have demonstrated a good understanding of Wikipedia's standards. I would appreciate it if my account could be considered for the autopatrolled permission, as it would help reduce the workload for New Page Patrol volunteers. Needforname (talk) 15:48, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
I would like to have access in order to perform batch updates of outdated locator maps. Excommunicato (talk) 19:51, 10 November 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
Hello, Fellow Wikipedians! After User:Strongshorts suggested that I request for Extended Confirmed permissions, I decided to request again after my previous request was declined! Again, I have familiarised myself with WP:GAME as well as WP:EXTENDEDCONFIRMED. I will promise not to game the system ever again. Happy editing and best wishes, Zahrazamedahmedi 💬My Talk Page💬 🫗My Mistakes🫗 05:12, 8 November 2026 (UTC)
Could I have my extended-confirmed status restored? It's been more than 30 days, and I've put in more than 500 major edits. I lost my status because I gamed the system by inserting wikilinks to increase my edit count. Nearly a year ago, I thought this would be a good way to avoid violating protections put on pages related to WP:PIA. I had not read all the rules surrounding protected topics, and I learned, notice by notice, how much I had to steer clear of those topics. I think I have had a clean record since having my status revoked. Though I've gotten into some extended discussions on talk pages, my edits by and large have not been reverted nor my editing style labelled as disruptive. I was going to wait until the one year anniversary of my status being revoked, but I was just pinged in a discussion on a page I can't edit. It was also by an editor I've historically disagreed with, which I take to be a good sign that I haven't ruffled too many feathers on Wikipedia. Thanks for your consideration! Dauntbares (talk) 16:24, 12 November 2026 (UTC)
Could you apply EC rights to my alt account User:Equivalent-Text2598 (alt) as I have TAIV and AWB rights so am aware of the damage a comprimised account could cause. Cheers. Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 17:29, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator |
| Requests for file mover |
|---|
File mover
Reason for requesting file mover rights is to fix minor mistakes made when uploading. I upload many files pertaining to history and astronomy, and sometimes make a mistake in the title I do not notice until the file is uploaded (for example; wrong date, typo). It simplifies the process of fixing said errors if I can do it myself. Minnastronomer (talk) 04:36, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the mass message sender flag. |
|---|
Mass message sender |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I would like to help reduce the backlog of unreviewed new pages. I have experience participating in XFD, AfC reviewing, and creating/expanding articles, including promoting 1 good article. I believe that I meet the general criteria for NPR. EvanTech10 (talk, contribs) ⚡ 01:24, 12 November 2026 (UTC)
Previously had the rights which were revoked for inactivity. Would like to help with the backlog, particularly reviewing new redirects. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 21:40, 12 November 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting new page reviewer rights to assist with the backlog and identify obvious spam and attack pages. I have experience in AfC and some in XFD. BlueStaticHorse (talk🌸) 13:26, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
Hi! I've had limited time over the last three weeks, but reviewing was interesting work and I'd like to renew my patrolling rights. Thank you! E mln e (talk) 12:00, 15 November 2026 (UTC) |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
Previously had page mover rights which expired due to inactivity. Would like them again to carry out technical requests and close page moves. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 20:49, 12 November 2026 (UTC)
Reason: I actively maintain and standardize article titles across international sports, tournament documentation, and New Page Patrol, and I regularly hit technical limitations that require waiting on WP:RM/TR or tagging redirects for speedy deletion. Specifically, I need the Page mover right to: Revert unexplained or undiscussed moves where the original title is blocked by a redirect (using round-robin swaps). Suppress (R2) cross-namespace redirects directly when draftifying premature mainspace articles, rather than having to tag every leftover redirect with {{db-r2}}. Suppress implausible typo/formatting redirects (R3) when correcting capitalization, diacritics, or naming convention errors (WP:COMMONNAME / WP:CONCISE). Clean up cut-and-paste moves and move multi-part templates or tournament pages together with their subpages (/doc, /sandbox, sub-events). I understand WP:R#DELETE and will preserve redirects whenever a title is a plausible search term, former name, or has incoming links. Ravana TALK 09:24, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
Hello! I submitted a request for this right not too long ago, It was denied because I didn't yet have enough experience, But, I have largely improved over time and have almost 700 edits and a large track record of removing vandalism. I'm requesting this right because I'm wanting access to AntiVandal and just better tools in general. I also have a very good track record for notifying editors when reverting their edits. I have no history of edit warring. And I believe I meet all requirements to be given this permission. Thank You, 208𝑦𝒆𝑎𝒉ℎ (talk) 01:12, 12 November 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting rollback rights for access to anti-vandalism tools such as CVPI and AbuseReview. I have plenty of experience patrolling RTRC, patrolling Special:AbuseLog, and warning editors after reverting their edits. Szxq (talk) 22:18, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
I have been patrolling changes for over a year as well as participating at ANI, SPI & AINB... This right could be useful to me especially for WP:SOCKREVERTing.. Vestrian24Bio 07:31, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for temporary account IP viewer |
|---|
Temporary account IP viewer
I work in counter-vandalism, Articles for Creation, and, more recently, the AI noticeboard. I belive that TAIV permissions are required because in Articles for Creation and AI cleanup, it would be useful to see if TAs are block evading or have used LLMs in the past (for cleanup reasons and for linking cleanup cases at the AINB). For counter-vandalism, it would be useful simply for reporting socks and confirming if possibly connected TAs are connected. BlueStaticHorse (talk🌸) 15:04, 11 November 2026 (UTC)
I would like to be a temporary account IP viewer. As you can see from my recent edit history, I have been involved in counter-vandalism, and I have initiated sockpuppet investigations. IGAEB (talk) 01:24, 12 November 2026 (UTC)
It has been suggested to me that I request this right in order to save time on filing SPIs since I've been involved in many SPIs now (usually with the same users using different socks). Raskuly 🐰 14:49, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
|
Immediate requests
| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
| Requests for unblock | 110 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 1 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion | 24 |
| Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 2 |
Deletion
| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Articles for deletion | 654 |
| Templates for deletion | 39 |
| Categories for deletion | 492 |
| Wikipedia files for discussion | 113 |
| All redirects for discussion | 449 |
| Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 8 |
| Possible copyright violations | 11 |
| All articles proposed for deletion | 462 |
| All files proposed for deletion | 27 |
| Unsorted AfD debates | 1 |
| All files with the same name on Commons | 148 |
Image copyright problems
| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Orphaned non-free use | 443 |
| Unknown copyright status | 24 |
| Unknown source | 14 |
| No non-free use rationale | 0 |
| Replaceable non-free use images | 12 |
| Disputed non-free use images | 8 |
Page protection
| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Protected | 10 |
| Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,404 |
| Fully protected user and user talk pages | 748 |
| Protected against vandalism | 3 |
| Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
| Semi-protected | 2,181 |
| Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
|
General cleanup | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| All pages needing cleanup | 33,574 | 0.46 |
| All articles needing rewrite | 6,559 | 0.09 |
| All articles needing expert attention | 1,488 | 0.02 |
| All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 46,021 | 0.63 |
|
Reference problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All pages needing factual verification | 13,761 | 0.19 |
| All articles with unsourced statements | 588,500 | 8.1 |
| All articles lacking sources | 27,681 | 0.38 |
| All unreferenced BLPs | 1 | 0 |
| All articles needing additional references | 547,721 | 7.54 |
| All articles needing references cleanup | 6,176 | 0.09 |
| All articles lacking in-text citations | 111,045 | 1.53 |
| All articles with dead external links | 365,126 | 5.03 |
|
Image cleanup problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
| Wikipedia files lacking a description | 151 | - |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source | 11 | - |
|
Other problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All articles proposed for merging | 250 | 0 |
| All articles proposed for splitting | 885 | 0.01 |
| Unsorted Stubs | 0 | - |
| Stub categories | 21,766 | - |
| All uncategorized pages | 293 | 0 |
| All orphaned articles | 52,747 | 0.73 |
| All articles needing copy edit | 1,489 | 0.02 |
| All articles with style issues | 20,708 | 0.29 |
| All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,637 | 0.04 |
| All articles that may contain original research | 17,314 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Requested moves | 493 |
| All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 2,208 |
| All accuracy disputes | 15,748 |
| Articles with invalid ISBNs | 1 |
| Articles with invalid ISSNs | 4 |
| All articles to be expanded | 52,597 |
Special pages
| Maintenance reports | Information |
|---|---|
| Broken redirects | |
| Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
| Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
| DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
| Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
| Long pages | |
| New pages | New page patrol |
| New pages feed | Page curation |
| Protected pages | Protection policy |
| Short pages | |
| Uncategorized | Categorization |
| Uncategorized cats | |
| Uncategorized templates | |
| Unused categories | |
| Unused files (images) | |
| Unused templates | |
| Without interwiki links | |
| Most interwiki links | |