Jump to content

User:DVdm

This user uses Huggle to fight vandalism.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A trivial refutation of one of Dingle's Fumbles (Ref: Talk:Herbert Dingle Archive)

On page 230 in this appendix to "Science At the Crossroads", Dingle writes:

(start quote)
Thus, between events E0 and E1, A advances by t1 and B by t'1=at1 by (1). Therefore
rate of Arate of B=t1at1=1a>1(3)
...
Thus, between events E0 and E2, B advances by t'2 and A by t2=at'2 by (2). Therefore
rate of Arate of B=at'2t'2=a<1(4)
Equations (3) and (4) are contradictory: hence the theory requiring them must be false.
(end quote)

Dingle should have written as follows:

(start correction)
Thus, between events E0 and E1, A, which is not present at both events, advances by t1 and B, which is present at both events, by t'1=at1 by (1). Therefore
rate of clock not present at both events E0 and E1rate of clock present at both events E0 and E1=coordinate time of E1proper time of E1=rate of Arate of B=t1t'1=t1at1=1a>1(3)
...
Thus, between events E0 and E2, B, which is not present at both events, advances by t'2 and A, which is present at both events, by t2=at'2 by (2). Therefore
rate of clock not present at both events E0 and E2rate of clock present at both events E0 and E2=coordinate time of E2proper time of E2=rate of Brate of A=t'2t2=t'2at'2=1a>1(4)
Equations (3) and (4) are consistent and say that any event's coordinate time is always larger than its proper time:

hence there is no reason to say that the theory requiring them must be false.

(end correction)

DVdm 12:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC)