User:Avgeekamfot

• WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT
• WP:AIRLINE-CONTENT
  • "Clear consensus" that airport and airline destination lists do not violate WP:NOT (WP:DESTNOT)
  • Village pump: primary sources acceptable for destination lists
• WP:RS
  • WP:Simple Flying ()
  • The Points Guy ()
• WP:ONUS
• WP:RETAIN (WP:ARTCON)
• WP:SOCKHELP (incl. WP:SOCKSTRIKE)
  • WP:DUCKTEST
• WP:RFC/A

Paid editors

As a paid editor you are expected as part of your remuneration to abide by all of the rules. You are paid to discover, learn, understand, and implement all relevant rules, policies, and procedures. Further, you are paid to write neutral and correctly referenced prose which passes these criteria. This is an amateur project. Amateur editors do not generally feel the need to assist paid editors to receive their pay.

I am not averse to good paid editors. If you can write good, neutral, well referenced prose as a draft and submit it for review and acceptance, and receive payment for doing so, then good for you. I welcome you here

However

If you want to use the WP:AFC process to submit your draft more than once, thinking in your error that we will help you get paid, then you have another think coming.

If you are unable to create a draft that requires more than one corrective review, then I do not welcome you here. The only advice I will offer will be within my reviews. I will not otherwise help you to get paid.

If you create your draft as a live article or move your draft to become a live article, then you will discover that this is against the terms of being a paid editor. ~~~~

The above note was written by Timtrent at User:Timtrent/Paid