This is a Wikipediauser page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AnotherAnonUsername/creations.
An article created by AnotherAnonUsername does not mean an endorsement of the subject(s) featured in the article. Just because we edit an article, does not mean that we are endorsing all the contents of the article. If you would like to know our personal beliefs, they are listed on our main user page User:AnotherAnonUsername.
This is a list of articles that AnotherAnonUsername has created on Wikipedia that were approved from a draft.
This is a list of userboxes that AnotherAnonUsername has created on Wikipedia. Just because this account created a userbox does not necessarily mean that the userbox applies to this account. They could apply or they could not apply. For a list of userboxes that do apply to this account, please see our main user page User:AnotherAnonUsername.
Use the search bar at the top of the Wikimedia Commons page to find an image to use in the userbox. If the File:.jpg is too big, then you can resize using this guide.
on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, which is a website that is known for having a wide variety of articles, as well as user boxes. But why... user boxes? Considering the millions of articles that this website has to offer, you choose to look at... user boxes? I just find it fascinating to have this 'quantum' conversation. Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment of quantum mechanics, where, unless the cat box is opened, the cat may be either alive or dead or existing in a state of being alive and dead? This 'conversation' might be dead. I might be talking to no one. Who knows if anyone else would read this? You could say these words are, a cat box within a cat box. But if someone does read this, then this conversation is very much 'alive'. So from my perspective, you, are both a potential 'reader' and a potential 'non-reader'. If you're reading this, what were you expecting at the end of all those drop down lists? Does this meet your expectations? Or rather, did you expect anything at all? I wondered if I should have kept going, but I saw the text size getting smaller and smaller and well... figured it had to end at some point. Are you happy to have reached the end? Or maybe sad? Sad that it didn't go on for longer? What about the others? Are we going to be satisfied by knowing that this is the end ourselves, or will we want to share this? And when we do, will they also want to share this? Is there ever any really satisfaction in that? The first time you watch a movie and reach the end, how can you watch it as though it's your first again? Will you try to fill that feeling by looking up other people's reaction to the series you held dear? What does this person think of this part of the anime? How will they react to this twist in the TV series? How will you abide the time when waiting to see what their reaction will be? And when you reach that conclusion, what then? Searching for another Youtuber's thoughts. Maybe a video essay, or applying the work to a political ideology, or a religion, or something else, or nothing? By transforming the original work, at what point is it still, 'this'. Like the 'Ship of Theseus', combined with a concept that holds the viewers interpretation of a text as equal to that of the author's. By adding more philosophical buzzwords, does the text continue to capture your imagination, or does it dull your mind over the same re-used concepts. In fact, do you even 'know' how to use a drop-down-list. What does it mean to 'know'. Do you set it upon yourself that the criteria to put this userbox on your userpage is just a basic knowledge of how to use a drop-down-list, or is it more? And if you think it to be more, will the reader reading this userbox think the same thing, or will they undermine your talents? Because the same word can have multiple meanings. And the more words one uses to explain themselves, to cover up the patches of the Ship, the heavier it becomes and easier to sink to the murky depths below. Do we, elaborate in more detail and risk over-explaining, or speak economically and risk under-explaining? How can anyone set a standard considering what an expert may see as over-explaining, a mere beginner sees as under-explaining? Do you consider the knowledge of knowing that this is the last chain of drop down lists in this userbox as bliss? Imagine if someone didn't even know that the first word 'This' could have been clicked. Maybe they thought the meta humour was that juxtaposition between a typical userbox, and a more abstract memetic single word? Because is this 'this' or is this bliss? Or both? Or maybe the dropdown boxes just suddenly opened by themselves and someone saw a bunch of text and was curious what it was? Was it hard to read this text? Or did you just copy and paste it into a text reader with a bigger text size? When 'this' word is like this, 'this' by itself is not tethered to the meaning of other words. Think about this. Sincerely, to the you, the reader, that may exist or may not exist or may exist and not exist?
_–_preferences-system-privacy-symbolic.svg){kind=icon}
.svg){kind=small}
