Template talk:WikiProject Classical music

Replace code

{{edit protected}} Please replace with the code at Template:Classical/sandbox. Thanks! §hep • ¡Talk to me! 16:11, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

 Done. Graham87 07:13, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

MetaBanner

Would there be any objections or concerns to converting this banner to use Template:WPBannerMeta? Martin 21:25, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Please ask the Classical Music Project. Unfortunately no-one will see your question if you leave it here. --Kleinzach 07:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Why the change to this banner? Was the project told about it?

I see this banner has been moved by User:Happy-melon, see . Perhaps we can have an explanation? Was the project told about it? I can't see any post at the Classical Music Project. --Kleinzach 07:49, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Also, isn't this template protected? --Kleinzach 08:14, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Once again this has been changed without notice by User:Happy-melon and it now seems to be set to B class! --Kleinzach 23:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Revert, please

{{edit protected}} Can we revert to the Antandrus version of 18 October 2008? This was changed without informing or consulting the project and seems to have been screwed up. It now displays B class — at least on the template page. Thank you. --Kleinzach 04:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Can you explain exactly what is broken? From what I can see, everything is working okay. --- RockMFR 06:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Look at the Template:WikiProject Classical music. As explained above it now says B class. --Kleinzach 06:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

 Not done This is a default style I've seen on many other templates converted to this meta template. The template isn't broken. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 06:59, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Why doesn't this template assess?

I can't think of any reason why it shouldn't. So why has the assessment been turned off? Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 12:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Very simple. This project doesn't do assessments. --Kleinzach 00:51, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Lord Strad

I was hoping that you could help me out with something. I reviewed a new article Lord Strad, which appears to be the name that authors of the book Lord Strad of 1716 gave to a "missing" Stradivarius that has the initial history of the Messiah Stradivarius. Would you mind taking a look at the information I posted at Talk:Lord Strad - and the options, whether to delete the article altogether or rework the article as Lord Strad of 1716 with information from a The Strad magazine review of the book. Or, another option based upon your subject matter knowledge?--CaroleHenson (talk) 02:54, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 1 June 2019

Just bringing this template in line with other WikiProjects. See here for suggested changes (excluding the /sandbox bit). Also, the noinclude tag is redundant with {{substcheck}} now (as is the BANNER_NAME which derives it by default). qedk (t 桜 c) 11:03, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

 Done DannyS712 (talk) 14:22, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Request to update documentation

Could someone please update the documentation to match the template parameters?

• Basic usage: {{WikiProject Classical music}}
• Full usage: {{WikiProject Classical music |category= |listas= |attention= |composition= }}

Where is the documentation for this template? It doesn't seem to be at Template:WikiProject Classical music/doc. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 14:36, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

The doc went west with this edit. --Redrose64 🦌 (talk) 15:32, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

@MSGJ: It seems like the auto-documentation feature of Module:WikiProject banner makes some assumptions that the class and importance/priority parameters are always going to exist, which is not the case with this template. It also currently assumes all task forces have acorresponding importance parameter.

I've made a change in the sandbox that checks all parameters before adding them - can you check to see if that's the right kind of change to address this issue? Harryboyles 15:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

It is supposed to be checking that already (in lines 556-557). I will check why it is not working properly here. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:11, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

How's that looking now? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Looks good to me! Harryboyles 17:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Updating the banner to include assessment

I raised this issue at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical music#Updating our banner. There was support for updating this banner to include assessment from the minimal participation there. I thought I would raise it here just in case more editors would like to comment before adjusting the template. To reiterate what I said there, most of the articles with the classical music banner already are assessed by other projects. It would be helpful for targeting article improvement and development for our banner to be modified to include assessment as well. I am not seeing a down side to this. Not to mention it would be nice to be able to navigate easily to FA and GA class articles within the scope of the project. The current banner does not allow for that.4meter4 (talk) 14:56, 13 October 2026 (UTC)

Yes, I would support it purely for category sorting. Why? I Ask (talk) 15:09, 13 October 2026 (UTC)

I'm still in favor of this reasonable update. Trumpetrep (talk) 04:07, 14 October 2026 (UTC)