Talk:Vimal Arora

Suggestions for improvement of this page

Hi @AlphaBetaGamma and @Khagendrawiki i have made multiple edits to improve the draft of this Page. During this i have also learned and understood the processes and therefore removed any claim that i don't had a strong reliable souce to cite to it. I did hours of internet browsing in past 6 days and found the best possible references that i believe can be suitable and therefore added them. I have also reduced several sections and sentences as well that i felt are not that good i.e. encyclopedia style write-ups. I have even removed the official website of Vimal Arora as it can also self referencing and can go against the Wiki Guidelines. I have also removed the overexaggerated award counts as you have mentioned. I tried very hard to find the references and all possible of them have already added by me. I wish you to take a look of the current draft of Vimal Arora and let me know if its ready to Resubmit. Also if you have suggestions then also you can share. That will be very helpful. Amitunbind (talk) 09:51, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Request for Guidance Regarding the Vimal Arora Article

Hi @Izno, I hope you are doing well. I’m reaching out regarding the Vimal Arora article that was recently moved back to draft space (Draft:Vimal Arora) .

I was out of town for last 2 days and today I checked and noticed that the page had been made live earlier by an editor named Standgusto (User:Standgusto), and I later learned that this account has since been identified as a sockpuppet. I want to clarify that I have no connection with that user, nor was I aware of their involvement until after the move was made.

As someone still learning Wikipedia’s processes, I’m unsure what specific issue led to the article being returned to draft space. I genuinely want to understand if there was any mistake on my part so I can correct it and ensure the article meets Wikipedia’s standards.

If you could kindly guide me on what needs improvement, whether it’s sourcing, tone, notability, or any other aspect, I would be very grateful. My only intention is to improve the article so that it can eventually be suitable for mainspace in full compliance with Wikipedia policies.

Thank you for your time, patience, and the work you do for the community. I truly appreciate any direction you can offer.

Warm regards,

Amitunbind Amitunbind (talk) 08:12, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Please review and Make it Live :)

Hi @NeoGaze @Matrix , Recently @Htanaungg had again rejected this one and given the instructions to remove linkedin & youtube references, which i have followed and made changes, please review once again and see if its accurate enough to go to Live space. Regards, Amitunbind (talk) 13:14, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Article Revised, Please Review and Make it Live :)

Thank you @Somepinkdude @Htanaungg @NeoGaze @AlphaBetaGamma & @Matrix for the earlier feedback on this draft. The article has been substantially revised to address all previously noted concerns to the best of my knowledge.

The content is now written entirely in prose, with formatting simplified and unnecessary bolding and list-style presentation removed. All statements have been carefully reviewed for verifiability, and citations have been aligned directly with the claims they support. Non-reliable and self-published sources have been removed, and the draft now relies primarily on independent secondary sources from established news publications and official records.

The tone has been edited to ensure neutrality and compliance with the biographies of living persons policy, and the lead section has been tightened to summarize key facts without operational detail.

I believe the article now meets Wikipedia’s standards for notability, sourcing, neutrality, and style, and I welcome any further guidance if additional improvements are needed.

Regards, Amitunbind (talk) 20:34, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Comments left by AfC reviewers

• Comment: The lists, overuse of bold, and unrelated references seem to suggest that AI was used. Somepinkdude (talk) 21:19, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: LinkedIn and YouTube should not be used for referencing--please find reliable secondary sources only. Htanaungg (talk) 09:59, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: Do Not remove declined notice you can always improve your draft and re-submit anytime you want, your chance of getting this approved draft will increase if you take above advise from AlphaBetaGamma and work accordingly Khagendra (talk) 08:35, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: Relies way too much on primary source in my opinion. Missing citations and overexaggerated award counts are a red flag. Please only list the most important roles, with those that have/warrant a wikipedia article preferred AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 14:04, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for creating this article for a Director General of Dental Services in the Armed Forces Medical Services, who reaches WP:NBIO primarily through his work in this role. It would now be helpful to link this page from other, also checking some of the existing links (I wonder whether he is involved in football management!).

Klbrain (talk) 04:17, 4 January 2026 (UTC)