Talk:Uguisu no fun
Add topicA fact from Uguisu no fun appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 July 2010. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Something not quite well about this article
[edit]Anyone else think there's something a bit off in this article? Cus I've got a suspicion that it isn't up to par when it comes to article standards.
Firstly - I'm not entirely sure that ugisu no fun is actually the same thing as a "Geisha facial" sold halfway across the world that, I'm guessing, just takes inspiration from someone's second read-through of Arthur Golden's Memoirs of a Geisha. It sounds like a trade name - not the same as its usage in Japan.
Secondly - and as an extension of the former - I'd really appreciate someone having a look over the sources and bibliography used here. It seems like on first glance, a lot of them might - and I've not read them, but they might - just be a number of different Western news outlets covering a facial offered by one New York City spa. Someone also shoved in MoaG for good measure, a fiction book, not a reliable reference; God knows Golden screwed up the rest of that novel.
I've gone through and added transl tags where I can, but I'd appreciate another pair of hands to have a look over this. Thanks! --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 21:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- B-Class Japan-related articles
- Mid-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- B-Class fashion articles
- Low-importance fashion articles
- B-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles


