Talk:Theft by finding
Add topicLatest comment: 2 years ago by Otherthinker in topic Merge proposal
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The content of Theft by finding in the United States was merged into Theft by finding on 2023-12-21. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Merge proposal
[edit]I propose merging Theft by finding in the United States into Theft by finding. The content in Theft by finding in the United States can easily be explained in the context of Theft_by_finding#United_States, and a merge would not cause any article-size or weighting problems.Mooonswimmer 00:05, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- I am in agreement that Theft by finding in the United States is largely short and tis will make both articles better. Jorahm (talk) 17:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- I also agree, both articles are small and it's beneficial to have them in one place especially when the content is overlapping. Will try to do the merge now. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:11, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- I am the original author. The merge has created a dislocation. The section which refers to Professor Tay's collection of cases appears to be a part of the law of the United States when they are from English case law. I will review and edit shortly. Otherthinker (talk) 11:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- I also agree, both articles are small and it's beneficial to have them in one place especially when the content is overlapping. Will try to do the merge now. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:11, 21 December 2023 (UTC)