Talk:The Big Bend

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from The Big Bend appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 July 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that The Big Bend, which would be the world's longest building if built, was designed to circumvent zoning regulations?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Did you know archive/2017/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Big Bend.

Wikipedia

Longest

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The discussion of this building's "length" - which generally suggests a horizontal measurement - is somewhat misleading and sounds like a marketing gimmick. While the photograph provides some clarification, the text should also. PurpleChez (talk) 18:39, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

As well as the bit about circumventing zoning. It does no such thing. Two vertical towers connected at the top (whether with a horizontal bridge or a U shape) does not make one tower that is "higher" than zoning allows. The article should also explain the proposed elevator system is one which the car goes up one shaft, travels horizontally to a second shaft for the descent. MB 20:48, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply