Talk:The Amazing Race 3
Add topic| The Amazing Race 3 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 18, 2026. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Location list
[edit]I have Season 3 on divx... I'll end up expanding the location list after I finish seasons 1 and 2. --Madchester 01:17, 2005 May 12 (UTC)
Roadblock
[edit]The Roadblock in Singapore had teams run around some fountain (maybe the one in Suntec City) three times. Probably the easiest RB ever, and probably why the editors were wise not to air it. --Madchester 02:58, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
Leg 7
[edit]Is it really true to list Leg 7 as "Morocco→Germany→Austria→Germany→Austria→Germany" when really no team actually went out of and back into Austria? Wouldn't it make more sense to have "Morocco→Germany→Austria/Germany→Germany" or simply "Morocco→Germany→Austria→Germany" while having a footnote explaining the unique situation?
GA review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Amazing Race 3/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Bgsu98 (talk · contribs) 18:13, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: BedsAreBurning (talk · contribs) 09:10, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
sallam alaikum, i am reviewing this mostly because my other review is still going to wait (i am sure you know who the nominator for it is, you can see it here: Talk:Lehakat Pikud Merkaz/GA1. in the meantime, this article will help in my goal to improve articles related to The Sopranos. season over-view articles are probably very easy to improve, but i'd rather save them for after i'm done with the episode articles. anyhow, i will be clearing the "basics", this is unlikely to be a long review, but i'm sure that you appreciate it anyway =) BedsAreBurning aka Sound🇵🇸 09:10, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
- copyvio: 46.8%, but it's nothing that bad =) BedsAreBurning aka Sound🇵🇸 09:15, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Bgsu98, since you pledged to review any category except for two, i will be asking you to review a GAN in the same category as this GAN, television. great work on the article, by the way =) BedsAreBurning aka Sound🇵🇸 09:40, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
source review
[edit]This table checks 8 passages from throughout the article (24.2% of 33 total passages). These passages contain 9 inline citations (25.0% of 36 in the article). Generated with the Veracity user script. BedsAreBurning aka Sound🇵🇸 09:10, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
| Reference # | Letter | Source | Archive | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casting for this season began in April 2002. | |||||
| 5 | realityblurred.com | web.archive.org | |||
| In 2021, Andrew Shayde (né Hyde) appeared on Naked and Afraid and lasted 13 days in South Africa before being removed for a possible MRSA infection. | |||||
| 10 | x.com | ||||
| 11 | "Bite Me". Naked and Afraid. Season 12. Episode 10. April 18, 2021. Discovery Channel. | ||||
| In 2024, Shayde appeared on Naked and Afraid XL. | |||||
| 15 | press.wbd.com | web.archive.org | |||
| Heather and Eve were the first team to arrive at the Pit Stop, but they had misread the clue that told them to walk rather than take a taxi. They received a seven-minute time penalty for the advantage gained, plus an additional thirty-minute penalty. Since all of the other teams arrived less than thirty-seven minutes afterward, Heather and Eve were eliminated. | |||||
| 17 | cbsnews.com | web.archive.org | |||
| At Suntec City, one team member had to run three times around the center of the Fountain of Wealth before retrieving their next clue from the middle of the fountain. | |||||
| 22 | stateofbuildings.sg | web.archive.org | |||
| Dalton Ross of Entertainment Weekly praised the unpredictability of this season, writing that "you never truly know what's going to happen." | |||||
| 26 | ew.com | web.archive.org | |||
| In 2021, Jane Andrews of Gossip Cop ranked this season as the show's 6th best season. | |||||
| 29 | gossipcop.com | web.archive.org | |||
| Television Without Pity co-creator Tara Ariano called Flo "malingering". | |||||
| 34 | msnbc.msn.com | web.archive.org | |||
GA list
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- ce here and there, but that's all
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- good stuff all around
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- no notes here
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- see source review
- C. It contains no original research:
- see source review.
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- copyvio said 46%, but the similarities are nothing to really note.
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- no comment
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- short and sweet, that's the way you do it.
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- the reception section is a good example of the neutral tone used here.
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- article is as stable as the pyramids
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- with the exception of the home media cover art (which has a rationale), most of the images are free with CC licenses or are in the public domain
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- the article makes great use of a wide array of images of the destinations that the show went to during this season. (shout out to leg 13 =P)
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- great job, man =)
- Pass or Fail:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:07, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- GA-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- GA-Class The Amazing Race articles
- Unknown-importance The Amazing Race articles
- The Amazing Race task force articles
- GA-Class Reality television articles
- Low-importance Reality television articles
- Reality television task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles

