Talk:Texture (geology)
Add topicLatest comment: 14 years ago by Mikenorton in topic Is this definition correct?
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The content of Rock microstructure was merged into Texture (geology) on 26 December 2022. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Is this definition correct?
[edit]This definition was popular in the early 19th Century. However, when theories predicted the size of mineral crystals to differ fundamentally from their orientations (or banding), texture then referred exclusively to the size of minerals and the relative sizes of minerals in rocks. (C.I.P.W. wrote extensively on this.)
I'm isolated from modern literature; but is it reasonable to combine into one term features that are individually explained by different theories? This may have recently been done, but it doesn't seem a good idea. Geologist (talk) 00:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- This is quite an important subject, the term is used all the time, but it's often hard to find good definitions for these common terms - I'll see what I can come up with. Mikenorton (talk) 14:23, 1 May 2012 (UTC)