Talk:Supranational union
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Supranational union article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Section
[edit]- This section had previously been located before the table of contents. Adavis444 (talk) 04:41, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
I have edited the main page to make it reflect Supranationalism in the dictionary sense of the word. I have also emphasised the European Debate, and placed Weiler's theory at the bottom. Will 12:28, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you very much Will --Ysangkok 18:06, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
I have edited the page to make it have a better layout. I added boldness on line one, and I added a definition list. --Ysangkok 18:06, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you very much Ysangkok --Ysangkok 18:06, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you Ysangkok, it looks much better. Will 09:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Supranational union
[edit]Some interesting material on constitutions of supranational unions which might be included in this article or an associated one at some point.
- -Mork the delayer 08:05, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
"Confederation"
[edit]I object to the use of the word "confederation" in the opening sentence, surely a Federal Europe would still be a supranational union? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acamdc88 (talk • contribs) 05:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Supranational and multilateralism
[edit]Merging these topics would be a bad idea. The concepts are distinct because supranational means that political power is passed to an organization/a body beyond the nation state. On the other hand, nation states are very capable of acting multilaterally without ceding any political power to an organization beyond the nation states. BartBee (talk) 17:32, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- I agree. It is very important to identify actors - legislatures - appropriately. A Supranational Union has a distinct-body (ex. PACE) that legislates and holds authority over domestic and federal actors. In multilateral system (NATO, IMF) Federal actors hold authority of the decisions made (more so in NATO...) Nevertheless, this seems to be a point of contention when trying to homogenize the concepts of multilateralism and supranationalism. Reddevil1421 (talk) 20:56, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
- I agree with the statements above - a supranational union is a definite entity whreas multilateralism is a concept and is a broader subject than can be defined in the Supranational union article. As there has been no movement on the merging issue for nearly 2 years I will remove the merge tag from both Supranational union and multilateralism articles. Zangar (talk) 16:26, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- C-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- C-Class European Union articles
- Mid-importance European Union articles
- WikiProject European Union articles
- C-Class Globalization articles
- High-importance Globalization articles