Jump to content

Talk:Self-harm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 20 days ago by Polyamorph in topic should we remove the opening picture?
Former good articleSelf-harm was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 13, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
June 3, 2006Good article nomineeListed
May 16, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
February 16, 2010Good article reassessmentKept
February 16, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
August 24, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. Thanks, 1isall (talk/contribs) 02:07, 24 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

It seems that this article needs a lot of medical citations, something that hasn't been addressed since August 2023. Thanks, 1isall (talk/contribs) 00:23, 23 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Also worth mentioning is that the History section has the original synthesis template. I've seen 6 instances of [medical citation needed] in the Pathophysiology section. But the more medical citations at the top seems to imply that more than 6 of those are needed, possibly throughout the entire article. Thanks, 1isall (talk/contribs) 00:30, 23 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Addition of self sabotage

[edit]

I was wondering why self sabotage Isn't currently included in this article. Is it because the topic hasn't been researched enough? or is it because it isn't a form of self harm that can result in the injury of one's own tissue?

I personally think the addition of it would really help as I believe self sabotage is often overlooked as a form of self harm. Widening the scope of this article to include self sabotage could not only improve the knowledge that this article could provide, but improve the understanding that self harm is not a purely physical act.

Of course there are good reasons to not include it in this article, such as there not being enough credible research. ~2026-18691-91 (talk) 18:29, 25 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

I didn't know about the concept before reading your comments - so thanks for suggesting! From my quick glance it feels okay for (at least) a passing mention of it as a related concept. Personally, I think we may have it exist as a separate article (/draft) - self sabotaging is defined as unconscious decisions, while self harm is deliberate.
[ Though I guess psychoanalysis texts may argue that both phenomenon stems from a single source, hence it belongs in the same article, etc.. ] 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 12:53, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
There is an article for Self-destructive behavior, it's very detailed and links to this article in its See More section.
Perhaps the connection should be mutual, and made to be more explicit? Temporallyambiguous (talk) 22:05, 22 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

should we remove the opening picture?

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


I am kinda scared that someone is looking for this page because they are addicted to self harm

I am actually an ex-addicted but when I was bad at the time I used to search for images like this

I actually like the opening picture but I just want to clarify this for me Pedro hoki (talk) 20:39, 28 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

What are you looking to clarify, exactly? Wikipedia is not censored. crtbob@talk:~$ ls contribs 06:42, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
You can read about the inclusion of the image here. It's also possible to hide images you find uncomfortable. crtbob@talk:~$ ls contribs 06:46, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Crtbob thank you! Pedro hoki (talk) 11:25, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.