Talk:Rudstone

Better images are needed. Particularly macroscopic/wider shots of better quality specimens

The 2 pictures included here don't really give any indication as to what rudstone looks like on a more macroscopic level. Say, if you were to find it in the wild. I came here hoping to identify a potential rudstone deposite by the image, which is usually good quality for these articles. Unfortunately, we just have these extreme close ups that don't give any idea what it actually looks like.

Conclusion: I believe we need to source a freely available image of confirmed rudstone. If possible, of course.

I appreciate any help you guys provide. VoidHalo (talk) 13:45, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

I should be able to get a photo of a sample from my university's geology department soon. Adeeta (talk) 17:48, 11 November 2026 (UTC)

Low relevancy and source count

A casual internet search for the topic gives very few to no usable sources, with a large quantity of Wikipedia derivative sites. Perhaps articles for the different rock types under the Dunham classification should be removed and redirected to their respective sections in that article.

(I'm not particularly well versed in Wikipedia structure, if anyone is willing to explain, I'd like to know how to bring this issue up to the larger geology editing community.) Adeeta (talk) 17:47, 11 November 2026 (UTC)