This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
Latest comment: 8 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion
While creating this article, I verified all of its information, as well as tone, MOS compliance, etc., so that it is entirely up to par (if a bit lacking in detail, which I chalk up to the nicheness of the subject; it is at any rate too much detail to throw entirely under a subsection of Belief revision), but a different editor added a maintenance template even though there are no issues with any of that, and as a result, it is unclear what sort of revision would even warrant removal of the template. If you are seeing this, I would like you to review the article yourself (with as close scrutiny as you can) and reconsider the application of the template, which I have disputed in this other thread (please do not discuss the application of the template in this thread, so as to keep discussion in one place). 09:51, 3 December 2025 (UTC) Thiagovscoelho (talk) 09:51, 3 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
I had previously commented here asking for help with revising the article to fix some issues, but it seems that the issues were sufficiently fixed after the article was moved to draftspace and then accepted by a reviewer at AfC. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 13:12, 15 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
