Jump to content

Talk:Racial misrepresentation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Chilltherevolutionist in topic World view

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation–supported course assignment, between 11 January 2022 and 28 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sidmills (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Saa269.

Recent article of note

[edit]

This may be of some interest as a source here:

  • Byler, David (July 19, 2023). "Racial identity is more fluid than you might think". The Washington Post.

Summary: Americans (especially of mixed ancestry) change their ethno-racial self-identification all the time, especially to align with their politics, and this has considerable implications for the future of the US Republican Party.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  14:42, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • Especially* should be *of*
Americans *of* not *especially* of mixed ancestry can change their racial identity. 107.144.132.45 (talk) 23:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

World view

[edit]

All the examples provided are North American with the majority confined to just the USA.

Does this issue exist anywhere else in the world? 114.23.162.174 (talk) 20:10, 3 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

The page on Passing (racial identity) has a couple of examples from other countries that would probably fit the definition from this page. Chilltherevolutionist (talk) 04:47, 13 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

"Deliberately?"

[edit]

The introduction of the article says that Racial misrepresentation occurs "occurs when someone deliberately misrepresents their racial or ethnic background."

I don't see any inherent problem with this, but a couple of the linked examples do not seem to have consensus that there was deliberate misrepresentation.

In the case of Ward Churchill and Elizabeth Warren, for example, the linked articles talk about the controversy but leave open the possibility that this was an earnestly held but mistaken belief, and not deliberate deception. Shouldn't we err on the side of caution and distinguish between the cases of unquestionable fraud and those where there are sources claiming that the subject genuinely believed the claims? Believing something false without good evidence is not the same thing as malicious fraud. Chilltherevolutionist (talk) 04:41, 13 January 2026 (UTC)Reply