Talk:Promethium
Add topic | This  level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| Promethium has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Article changed over to new Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements format by schnee. Elementbox converted 11:09, 10 July 2005 by Femto (previous revision was that of 13:31, 9 July 2005). 9 July 2005
particle energies needed
[edit]I didn't find any mention of the emitted alpha, beta, etc energies of the various isotopes in the infoboxes. If there is a rare gamma ray possible from PM-147, then there should be a reference as to what its energy should be.71.230.16.111 (talk) 05:15, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- For every decay of 147Pm, there is a 0.00285% chance of emitting a 121.64 keV gamma ray. (doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.10.025) Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 15:05, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Promethium picture?
[edit]I found this picture: File:Promethium.png. It's not exactly the highest quality, but it is promethium. So can it be added? HAt 06:23, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
- This appears to be a picture of Promethium metal: https://elements.vanderkrogt.net/jdurg/Pm.jpg (It has the same source as a rather reliable Technetium image) ~2026-19255-50 (talk) 13:48, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
something happened to the citations I think
[edit]under "applications" and the first part of "precautions" I think there were attempts at citations that kinda got screwed up, I don't know if it's just for me but the other citations seem fine. if it actually is something that happened, could someone fix it? thank you! Zfoilchy (talk) 11:39, 26 October 2026 (UTC)