Talk:PCL-181

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the PCL-181 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Asian / Chinese

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Military history. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

PCL181kachepao.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:22, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Range figures

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Helo, @An Asphalt
You recently readded figures sourced to armyrecognition.com. The last time it was discussed at RSN, the participants all agreed it was not reliable.
Could you please explain why you readded the info?
The information in the body doesnt have a source either, I did not see it else would have removed that too. Note, this source does not seem to make any claims about range. In fact, the only other instance notes that It is capable of firing VLAP rounds that have a range of 50km, not 72km as was added. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 08:10, 26 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

@An Asphalt could you please clarify the questions raised above? Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 06:57, 27 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Captain Jack Sparrow I have reverted my edits. Will try to find more reliable sources. An Asphalt (talk) 18:01, 29 May 2025 (UTC)Reply